PhillipBlunt Posted September 20, 2019 Share Posted September 20, 2019 This thread isn’t locked yet? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewbieCanuckFan Posted September 20, 2019 Share Posted September 20, 2019 1 hour ago, 'NucK™ said: To be fair he never said anything about a premium pick or a good player. (didn't notice OP had been edited) As far as the current proposal, it seems like we are trading three fringe players, that all have decent potential, for one proven average player and a pick? No thanks! Also.. wrong forum section just to get more views? Schaller? Well from the standpoint he can't play any worse than last season, sure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hockeygod77 Posted September 20, 2019 Author Share Posted September 20, 2019 ok that's fine we will see if i had the correct idea..i like jake and dipeotro erickson and goldy..but this a business that requires gutsy moves sometimes....jake ok keep him so you lose bertchsi i Gaudette or new guys you just signed... going to have to waive some good guys....or do you cut bachman from utica...it should be dipetro and macintire in utica..then whoever first injury call up...but there was no point in signing bailey then or graovac.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhillipBlunt Posted September 20, 2019 Share Posted September 20, 2019 That’s deep. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I.Am.Ironman Posted September 20, 2019 Share Posted September 20, 2019 (edited) Why trade a good goalie prospect, a 3rd line player (virtanen), a fringe NHLer at best in Schaller, and a fringe NHLer with offensive potential for a 3rd line player? Likely not a great trade for the Canucks. Also, maybe everyone else should skip the passive aggressive memes and condescending responses and politely remind the poster of the proposals section. Who cares if they are in school, if they are, we were all in school once. Edited September 20, 2019 by I.Am.Ironman Grammar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhillipBlunt Posted September 20, 2019 Share Posted September 20, 2019 Just now, I.Am.Ironman said: Trade a good goalie prospect, a 3rd line player (virtanen), a fringe NHLer at best in Schaller, and a fringe NHLer with offensive potential for a 3rd line player? Also, maybe everyone else should skip the passive aggressive memes and condescending responses and politely remind the poster of the proposals section. Who cares if they are in school.. if they are.. we were all in school once. Nah. Where’s the proof that they’re in school? If the op is a kid, then maybe I’ll stand down, but until that point, full steam ahead. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
'NucK™ Posted September 20, 2019 Share Posted September 20, 2019 (edited) 6 minutes ago, NewbieCanuckFan said: Schaller? Well from the standpoint he can't play any worse than last season, sure. Notice how I said 3 players? (aka NHL players heh) Edited September 20, 2019 by 'NucK™ 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Senrik Hedin Posted September 20, 2019 Share Posted September 20, 2019 1 hour ago, 48MPHSlapShot said: i like pie I see your pie and raise you.... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winter Soldier Posted September 20, 2019 Share Posted September 20, 2019 1 hour ago, hockeygod77 said: a yuppie fan finally...make sure you wear that suit to game so we all can admire it...the canuck jersey dont fit i hear..no more xxx large jerseys ..sold out Tremendous. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhillipBlunt Posted September 20, 2019 Share Posted September 20, 2019 Just now, Winter Soldier said: Tremendous. We’re beyond Thunderdome Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sbriggs Posted September 20, 2019 Share Posted September 20, 2019 1 hour ago, hockeygod77 said: its going to take some tough decisions...my heart is with alll the canuck players but if you want a team of hockey players you need to cut some guys that just not a good fit ..hockey players as in guys that are into playing hockey the way you need to and sacrifice thats needed...not hust a hockey player that wants to play in the nhl...erickson time is done too..not sure what they will do there.. easy, send LE down to mentor boys in Utica or let him retire, I'm almost certain Goldy is done like dinner, have not seen anything positive from him in the preseason and have never really been a fan and theres no way there is room for him inb the top six and he doesn't belong in the bottom six. That takes care of two of them Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
48MPHSlapShot Posted September 20, 2019 Share Posted September 20, 2019 10 minutes ago, Senrik Hedin said: I see your pie and raise you.... I think we can find common ground. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sbriggs Posted September 20, 2019 Share Posted September 20, 2019 1 hour ago, danjr said: Idiotic. DiPietro is going to be Demko's backup, when Markstrom is moved. Dipietro is not going any where unless its toooooo sweet to turn down 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sbriggs Posted September 20, 2019 Share Posted September 20, 2019 44 minutes ago, reyezone said: This discussion dominated my work place today also. How to move assets that are extraneous before losing a player via waivers. We already let Granlund walk as a free agent, there goes that second round pick. How can JB manage his glut of wingers correctly and still come out on top, that is the question. i would, however, prefer to hang on to Jake and Mikey D. At this point several of them I would give away for beer, but I think there is some value in a few players possibly bundled together Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nuxfanabroad Posted September 20, 2019 Share Posted September 20, 2019 (edited) . Edited September 20, 2019 by Nuxfanabroad Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Heffy Posted September 20, 2019 Share Posted September 20, 2019 1 hour ago, reyezone said: This discussion dominated my work place today also. How to move assets that are extraneous before losing a player via waivers. We already let Granlund walk as a free agent, there goes that second round pick. How can JB manage his glut of wingers correctly and still come out on top, that is the question. i would, however, prefer to hang on to Jake and Mikey D. What second round pick? We traded Shinkaruk for him, and Granlund turned out to be a fringe NHLer while Shinkaruk is a career AHL guy\. That's a win. Regarding the proposal, I don't want to give up on Virt yet, and definitely want to keep Mikey. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RowdyCanuck Posted September 20, 2019 Share Posted September 20, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RowdyCanuck Posted September 20, 2019 Share Posted September 20, 2019 20 minutes ago, Sbriggs said: At this point several of them I would give away for beer, but I think there is some value in a few players possibly bundled together Id go one step further and give Loui away for one American beer. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DADDYROCK Posted September 20, 2019 Share Posted September 20, 2019 It's puff puff , PASS. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Heffy Posted September 20, 2019 Share Posted September 20, 2019 2 minutes ago, DADDYROCK said: It's puff puff , PASS. OP won't be old enough to get the reference for another decade. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now