Monty Posted October 3, 2019 Share Posted October 3, 2019 https://www.google.ca/amp/s/www.tsn.ca/chicago-blackhawks-sign-alex-debrincat-to-three-year-19-2m-extension-1.1375692%3ftsn-amp $6.4M x 3 extension with Hawks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fanuck Posted October 3, 2019 Share Posted October 3, 2019 Not sure if this kid is a perennial 40g/75pt scorer, but I guess the Hawks are. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D-Money Posted October 3, 2019 Share Posted October 3, 2019 Good on the Hawks for getting this done early. The market was already set, so why not? Saad is up in 2 years, and then Shaw, De Haan, and Maata at the same time as Debrincat, so Chicago will have a lot of money freed up at that point. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mll Posted October 3, 2019 Share Posted October 3, 2019 9M the final year. He'll be 1 year to free agency. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PunjabiCanucks Posted October 3, 2019 Share Posted October 3, 2019 Question is how does he play without Kane. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monty Posted October 3, 2019 Author Share Posted October 3, 2019 5 minutes ago, PunjabiCanucks said: Question is how does he play without Kane. Same question was asked about Panarin. I’m sure DeBrincat can hold his own. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
timberz21 Posted October 3, 2019 Share Posted October 3, 2019 3 hours ago, Fanuck said: Not sure if this kid is a perennial 40g/75pt scorer, but I guess the Hawks are. What if he isn't ...only a 3 years deal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
189lb enforcers? Posted October 3, 2019 Share Posted October 3, 2019 Modern day Patrick Sharp? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fanuck Posted October 3, 2019 Share Posted October 3, 2019 1 hour ago, timberz21 said: What if he isn't ...only a 3 years deal. Then you've locked yourself into a position, like BB, where you have to give a qualifying offer of at least the value (or a % higher I actually think) of the last year of the contract. So there is somewhat of a risk there. If he's not a 40g/75pt player at the end of three years you have to pay him like he is regardless. That's the risk. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skolozsy2 Posted October 3, 2019 Share Posted October 3, 2019 3 hours ago, PunjabiCanucks said: Question is how does he play without Kane. He only plays with Kane on the PP. Him and Strome had a rotation of Kahun, Perlini, and Cagguila mostly playing with them. This year it looks like its gonna be Shaw on that line. Occasionally Kane gets time with the Strome line 5 on 5, but usually it's only when the Hawks are in full out desperation mode (in which Kane plays wing on every line). 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted October 3, 2019 Share Posted October 3, 2019 6 hours ago, mll said: 9M the final year. He'll be 1 year to free agency. Kid scored 40. He deserves fair compensation. He's built like a block, and goes to the hard areas. Hate the Hawks, but this kid earned his dough. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kanucks25 Posted October 3, 2019 Share Posted October 3, 2019 AKA The Gudbranson pick. barf 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theo5789 Posted October 3, 2019 Share Posted October 3, 2019 15 minutes ago, kanucks25 said: AKA The Gudbranson pick. barf That would be Rasmus Asplund actually. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ruilin96 Posted October 3, 2019 Share Posted October 3, 2019 50 minutes ago, kanucks25 said: AKA The Gudbranson pick. barf 34 minutes ago, theo5789 said: That would be Rasmus Asplund actually. Not sure who the Canucks would of actually drafted if they had that pick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kanucks25 Posted October 3, 2019 Share Posted October 3, 2019 (edited) 47 minutes ago, ruilin96 said: Not sure who the Canucks would of actually drafted if they had that pick. I'll take either. + McCann Edited October 3, 2019 by kanucks25 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theo5789 Posted October 3, 2019 Share Posted October 3, 2019 1 hour ago, ruilin96 said: Not sure who the Canucks would of actually drafted if they had that pick. Sure but can't say Debrincat would've been the "Gudbranson pick". We could play the hindsight game in many ways. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GhostsOf1994 Posted October 4, 2019 Share Posted October 4, 2019 6 hours ago, 189lb enforcers? said: Modern day Patrick Sharp? Nah, debrincat does not have the looks to go after Duncan Keiths wife. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CBH1926 Posted October 4, 2019 Share Posted October 4, 2019 4 hours ago, skolozsy2 said: He only plays with Kane on the PP. Him and Strome had a rotation of Kahun, Perlini, and Cagguila mostly playing with them. This year it looks like its gonna be Shaw on that line. Occasionally Kane gets time with the Strome line 5 on 5, but usually it's only when the Hawks are in full out desperation mode (in which Kane plays wing on every line). I still have no idea how Hayes got that 50 million contract. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
timberz21 Posted October 4, 2019 Share Posted October 4, 2019 (edited) 8 hours ago, Fanuck said: Then you've locked yourself into a position, like BB, where you have to give a qualifying offer of at least the value (or a % higher I actually think) of the last year of the contract. So there is somewhat of a risk there. If he's not a 40g/75pt player at the end of three years you have to pay him like he is regardless. That's the risk. Jeez, pessimist much? 2 season, 59 and 69 goals each. No indication they aren’t legit. What’s the alternative locked them for 8 years at 7/8+ plus? Much bigger risk there id rather have the smaller cap hit for three years and bigger qualifier than the opposite. . They also have a chance to negotiate a long term deal during their last year of contract and that won’t even be a factor They will have more leverage but still, not to make a huge difference. And if they are not worth it, maybe it’s better just to let them walk or trade them to someone who will take a chance on them and has more caps space. Edited October 4, 2019 by timberz21 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IBatch Posted October 4, 2019 Share Posted October 4, 2019 Good signing, this kid is pretty good - and last year did this on the second line with PP minutes. If he was on our team there would be a couple hundred pages of glowing remarks about him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now