-Vintage Canuck- Posted December 16, 2019 Share Posted December 16, 2019 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kevin Biestra Posted December 16, 2019 Share Posted December 16, 2019 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post PhillipBlunt Posted December 16, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted December 16, 2019 Will Chatfield get reassigned next week and Brisebois recalled? 2 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
250Integra Posted December 16, 2019 Share Posted December 16, 2019 Who else wants some extra dough for Christmas? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
timberz21 Posted December 16, 2019 Share Posted December 16, 2019 (edited) I think JB is a little short on Air Miles for his next vacation and he's swiping his card every time there is a recall. ...if at least one of them would have played a game, wouldn't be completely useless. Edited December 16, 2019 by timberz21 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roger Neilsons Towel Posted December 16, 2019 Share Posted December 16, 2019 25 minutes ago, -Vintage Canuck- said: Didn’t these guys just pass eachother in the airport a few days ago? I’m not sure I get the logic here. I get letting them both get an nhl paycheque but why trade them back and forth for eachother like this? Oh well. Above my pay grade. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ossi Vaananen Posted December 16, 2019 Share Posted December 16, 2019 Lol, the swap comments are funny. I'm thinking they needed a righty after Stech got crunched last game. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuckpuckluck1 Posted December 16, 2019 Share Posted December 16, 2019 Maybe Brisebois is more important to Utica and management feels he is required on the blue line down there??? As a fan thats the way I see it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-SN- Posted December 16, 2019 Share Posted December 16, 2019 I thought Brisebois looked great during his time here. He's definitely a hockey player. 2 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D.B Cooper Posted December 16, 2019 Share Posted December 16, 2019 Isn’t there a limit to how many call ups you get in a year? Maybe save a bit for when everyone is injured at the end of the year? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EternalCanuckFan Posted December 16, 2019 Share Posted December 16, 2019 5 minutes ago, drummerboy said: Isn’t there a limit to how many call ups you get in a year? Maybe save a bit for when everyone is injured at the end of the year? IIRC, the limit kicks in after the trade deadline. I'm wondering if Myers was hurt against VGK. At least that would explain some of the lack of jump and early in the game, it seemed like he might have been hurt. Would also make more sense that the Canucks would want a RHD like Chatfield. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post rychicken Posted December 16, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted December 16, 2019 maybe Brisebois was here just because he needed to get his stuff... 2 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hockey God Posted December 16, 2019 Share Posted December 16, 2019 17 minutes ago, EternalCanuckFan said: I'm wondering if Myers was hurt against VGK. At least that would explain some of the lack of jump and early in the game, it seemed like he might have been hurt. Would also make more sense that the Canucks would want a RHD like Chatfield. Might explain Myers, but doesn't explain the poor effort the rest of the team has been giving at times ... I say let the young guys play, the lack of results can't be worse than what we are getting now. We'll also see very quickly whether the results are Green's fault or the fault of the players. I still suspect Green and his minor league mindset is at fault, but who knows .... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quantum Posted December 16, 2019 Share Posted December 16, 2019 JUST CALL UP BROGAN RAFFERTY YOU COWARDS! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghostsof1915 Posted December 16, 2019 Share Posted December 16, 2019 6 minutes ago, Quantum said: JUST CALL UP BROGAN RAFFERTY YOU COWARDS! Probably can't afford to lose one of their best defencemen? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hockeygod77 Posted December 16, 2019 Share Posted December 16, 2019 never seen so many call ups but player never gets to play...this organization is bizarre now...you need to get some tough skilled hockey players..they can either play or not....too much this that...the nhl is going downhill ..too much bs drama ..i like the game cause its fast skilled and unpredictable...old school hockey is what got me hooked...this new gary betman hockey sure sucks.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tyhee Posted December 16, 2019 Share Posted December 16, 2019 (edited) 2 hours ago, timberz21 said: I think JB is a little short on Air Miles for his next vacation and he's swiping his card every time there is a recall. ...if at least one of them would have played a game, wouldn't be completely useless. If the callups are viewed as injury replacements who are expected to be #7 and sit out unless there is another injury, it makes sense. Prospects should be getting game action to develop. Brisebois came up and sat and is now being sent back to Utica to get game action while Chatfield takes a turn mostly sitting. Rafferty may get his turn as well but being newer to the professional game and apparently their best defensive prospect in Utica, the Canucks may want him getting continued game action. Leaving Breezy in Vancouver for long periods of time to sit and sit and sit would only make sense if they'd given up on him as a prospect. In addition as has been mentioned if Stecher is a likely sitout they might have chosen to have the # 7 d-man be a right handed shot. Edited December 16, 2019 by tyhee 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nuxfanabroad Posted December 16, 2019 Share Posted December 16, 2019 1 hour ago, rychicken said: maybe Brisebois was here just because he needed to get his stuff... So get'cher stuff & skedaddle? Sounds like the name of a country tune Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
timberz21 Posted December 16, 2019 Share Posted December 16, 2019 1 hour ago, tyhee said: If the callups are viewed as injury replacements who are expected to be #7 and sit out unless there is another injury, it makes sense. Prospects should be getting game action to develop. Brisebois came up and sat and is now being sent back to Utica to get game action while Chatfield takes a turn mostly sitting. Rafferty may get his turn as well but being newer to the professional game and apparently their best defensive prospect in Utica, the Canucks may want him getting continued game action. Leaving Breezy in Vancouver for long periods of time to sit and sit and sit would only make sense if they'd given up on him as a prospect. In addition as has been mentioned if Stecher is a likely sitout they might have chosen to have the # 7 d-man be a right handed shot. That makes sense for a long period, say a month +. But for days to a week? That argument makes no sense at all. If anything all that travel and jetlag could cause fatigue and actually lead to injury. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
10pavelbure96 Posted December 16, 2019 Share Posted December 16, 2019 I want to see Olli at some point this season. We have to see what we have, he could excel with better linemates. It is time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.