Ossi Vaananen Posted January 29, 2020 Share Posted January 29, 2020 Bahaha, a month ago I proposed Hoglander + camp dump for deadline help and got torched for it. I'm glad to see people are coming around to moving a prospect for some cap relief. If we're adding a pick, might as well package Baer in there too. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob_Zepp Posted January 29, 2020 Share Posted January 29, 2020 5 hours ago, AriGold2.0 said: On July 1st the Canucks owe Loui a 3M signing bonus. Then it's only 1M salary for the season and a 1M SB the following year with a 3M salary. Cap hit of 6M with 2.5M actual money per season for the final 2 years. It's no secret John Madden (Tylers father) is Devils royalty. 9 seasons with the Devils, 711 games and 296 points. To NJD: Tyler Madden + 2021 2nd round pick + Loui Eriksson To VAN: Nikita Gusev Gusev is all salary no SB so Devils don't have to pay him anything. He has 1 year left on his contract and will be a free agent when the Canucks have to sign Petey and Quinn. Am I crazy ? Would prefer this trade for either a pick(s) or one of NJ's D prospects as they have some nice ones. Not getting Smith from them but Walsh or Misyul may be possible. They are doing Vancouver CAP space favour so asking them to lose a roster player isn't ideal AND Vancouver is fine without Gusev from within. Lind, although one of my projected potential loses to Expansion Draft, is an example of a player I feel is as good as Gusev is going to be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Provost Posted January 29, 2020 Share Posted January 29, 2020 (edited) 1 hour ago, Ossi Vaananen said: Bahaha, a month ago I proposed Hoglander + camp dump for deadline help and got torched for it. I'm glad to see people are coming around to moving a prospect for some cap relief. If we're adding a pick, might as well package Baer in there too. Hoglander > Madden So, you should still get torched for that. ... and this is coming from a person who has been leading the “trade futures to help our cap issues” for several months. I would literally trade any prospect, or package of prospects other than Hoglander and Podkolzin. They are higher end and fit the timeline when we are going to need to replace expensive veterans for cheap ELCs in the top 6. Edited January 29, 2020 by Provost Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
48MPHSlapShot Posted January 30, 2020 Share Posted January 30, 2020 (edited) So move 2.5 years of Eriksson AND a 2nd for a young guy that's going to be contributing to our squad while he's still on an entry level deal? Nah. Edited January 30, 2020 by 48MPHSlapShot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AriGold2.0 Posted January 30, 2020 Author Share Posted January 30, 2020 4 hours ago, Provost said: Hoglander > Madden So, you should still get torched for that. ... and this is coming from a person who has been leading the “trade futures to help our cap issues” for several months. I would literally trade any prospect, or package of prospects other than Hoglander and Podkolzin. They are higher end and fit the timeline when we are going to need to replace expensive veterans for cheap ELCs in the top 6. 100% this.. I wouldn't trade those 2 either. The rest can be traded as far as I'm concerned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now