Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

[Proposal] Boeser to COL


aGENT

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Rob_Zepp said:

By all accounts of people I know/trust and follow the WHL, he has been a far less impactful player this season than last and appears almost tentative in compare.   His team was a preseason selection as a top 5 CHL team for Memorial Cup and are instead struggling to make the playoffs with largely same lineup.

 

As a 16 year old in WHL he turned many heads by scoring 6 goals and amassing 27 points over 60 low minute games.

 

As as 17 year old he was dominant and in 67 games he had 26 goals and 71 points in regular season and followed by 26 points in 22 playoff games and an OT loss away from M Cup.

 

As a draft 18 year old he is on pace (projected to same 67 games ) to score 6 goals and get 42 points.    Pretty pedestrian.   

 

Hope for his sake the observations I am hearing and the statistics I can see are just bumps in the road.  I was fortunate to watch WJC live and he was NOT that impressive and far from best D on Canada let alone even in top 10 in the tournament.

Exactly what I thought as well.  I know it doesn't mean he won't be an impactful player, but like I said, not a gamble I'd be willing to take with a proven talent like Boeser.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

6 minutes ago, Rob_Zepp said:

Better idea, Colorado can score just fine.   What they need is players like Ferland/Leivo.   Why not keep Boeser and trade them for Byrum?   Oh - can't?   That is because you can't replace quality with quantity.

 

In any event, Colorado needs Boeser far less than they need someone to solidify their "toughness".

Calvert is plenty tough.  Johnson, Cole, Landeskog will fight too.  I don't see their team lacking toughness.

 

Leivo averages less than 0.5 hits per game. Canucks apparently the only team willing to give Ferland 4 years given his concussion history - now that teams have been proven right it seems much less likely for anyone to have interest given the risk.  

 

 

  • Cheers 1
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, HKSR said:

I don't know if you're talking Jack or Quinn Hughes, but both looked dominant in the WJC.  Jack was injured as well and a young 17 y/o, but when he played, he clearly showed why he was gonna go #1 OA.  We won't talk about Quinn, cuz clearly he was extremely dominant in the WJC.

 

I know that WJC does not a player make, but it also gives you an idea of how good a player could be playing against the best-of-the-best peer group.

It’s not Byrsm’s poor WJC for me.  It’s his regression in the WHL where he’s playing against boys that has me wondering.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, mll said:

 

Calvert is plenty tough.  Johnson, Cole, Landeskog will fight too.  I don't see their team lacking toughness.

 

Leivo averages less than 0.5 hits per game. Canucks apparently the only team willing to give Ferland 4 years given his concussion history - now that teams have been proven right it seems much less likely for anyone to have interest given the risk.  

 

 

Yet you want these two more than Boeser.......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Rob_Zepp said:

Yet you want these two more than Boeser.......

Don't understand what you mean.  Any team is significantly better off with Boeser rather than Ferland or Leivo.  

 

Edited by mll
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, HKSR said:

I don't know if you're talking Jack or Quinn Hughes, but both looked dominant in the WJC.  Jack was injured as well and a young 17 y/o, but when he played, he clearly showed why he was gonna go #1 OA.  We won't talk about Quinn, cuz clearly he was extremely dominant in the WJC.

 

I know that WJC does not a player make, but it also gives you an idea of how good a player could be playing against the best-of-the-best peer group.

Quinn. He far from dominated at either WJC. 3 points in 7 and 2 points in 7 respectively. There was much angst :lol: Not sure what you're remembering...

 

And pretty much on par with Byram's 2 points in more of a 2 way (vs more offensive for Quinn) role (while sick).

 

 

Edited by aGENT
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, mll said:

Don't understand what you mean.  Any team is significantly better off with Boeser rather than Ferland or Leivo.  

We fully agree on something.    Misunderstood, thought you were supporting this trade concept.   My bad.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, aGENT said:

Quinn. He far from dominated at either WJC. 3 points in 7 and 2 points in 7 respectively. There was much angst :lol: Not sure what you're remembering...

 

And pretty much on par with Byram's 2 points in more of a 2 way (vs more offensive for Quinn) role.

 

 

Hughes has a MASSIVE season post draft with both increased production in College let alone being involved overseas with US NHL players at WHC.    I don't think anyone is using just the WJC but the entire season.   I am hearing he has regressed and statistically, there is evidence for it.

  • Wat 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, aGENT said:

Quinn. He far from dominated at either WJC. 3 points in 7 and 2 points in 7 respectively. There was much angst :lol: Not sure what you're remembering...

 

And pretty much on par with Byram's 2 points in more of a 2 way (vs more offensive for Quinn) role (while sick).

 

 

He might not have put up big points, but he drove the USA offence from the back-end exactly the same way he's doing for the Canucks now.  He was an impactful player for sure on a powerful USA team. 

 

Byram on the other hand was barely noticeable at times.  Like others said, he has regressed.  It was noticeable at the WJC too.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Rob_Zepp said:

Hughes has a MASSIVE season post draft with both increased production in College let alone being involved overseas with US NHL players at WHC.    I don't think anyone is using just the WJC but the entire season.   I am hearing he has regressed and statistically, there is evidence for it.

The other poster and I were discussing his WJC specifically.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Lancaster said:

While Bowen Byram is a top tier defensive prospect... he's still just a prospect whereas Boeser is a bona fide top-6 winger. 

 

Unless Colorado is willing to throw in another pick or prospect as "insurance", it's better to keep Boeser.   

I agree, I would want more than just Byram for Boeser

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Lancaster said:

While Bowen Byram is a top tier defensive prospect... he's still just a prospect whereas Boeser is a bona fide top-6 winger. 

 

Unless Colorado is willing to throw in another pick or prospect as "insurance", it's better to keep Boeser.   

 

3 minutes ago, Viper007 said:

I agree, I would want more than just Byram for Boeser

 

1 hour ago, aGENT said:

We also add a likely future 1st pair D to play with Hughes, who's from BC and playing on the local Junior team (and I'd imagine a pick or other asset given Boeser's current value presently outweighs his).

 

1 hour ago, aGENT said:

Oh for sure there's some risk. I'd imagine Byram's fairly 'safe' as far as bets go, stranger things have happened though. One of the reasons I'd imagine we get another asset (pick?) to offset that risk.

 

  • Cheers 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Better idea: As a humanitarian move, send Brock home to Minnesota straight up for Kirill Kaprizov. Minnesota gets a home town hero who would be a key piece to their rebuild and Vancouver gets a very talented Russian to play with Podkolzin and Tryamkin. Who says no?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Curmudgeon said:

Better idea: As a humanitarian move, send Brock home to Minnesota straight up for Kirill Kaprizov. Minnesota gets a home town hero who would be a key piece to their rebuild and Vancouver gets a very talented Russian to play with Podkolzin and Tryamkin. Who says no?

Straight up?  Then no. 

As others have mentioned, BB is an NHLer.  

 

Maybe something along the lines of...

 

BB + Stetcher

for

Dumba + Kaprizov

 

Then I would think about it.

  • Cheers 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...