spook007 Posted March 8, 2020 Share Posted March 8, 2020 17 minutes ago, Timråfan said: Dahlen didn't force Bennings hands. Benning could have solved this in multiple ways without laying the full blame on Dahlen. Since we don't know exactly what went wrong it's hard for anybody to take a stand. Exactly what I said... I don't know enough to take a stand. My final word on this matter however will be that Benning seems to be decent towards his players... and something made him trade him away. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spook007 Posted March 8, 2020 Share Posted March 8, 2020 31 minutes ago, Timråfan said: I know about those aspects but it's here it shows if Benning is a GM ir not. Benning cound't be a diplomat and chose a middle path that didn't sacrifice a young person just because. In my view Benning is a great scout but not a GM. Sorry missed this one. Benning traded Dahlen... he needed to say something for the fans to understand, as everyone though he was going to be the next thing. He must either have been really mad at Dahlen, to come out and say this, or maybe it was a mistake... we all make mistakes. Who knows.... not me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Timråfan Posted March 8, 2020 Share Posted March 8, 2020 21 minutes ago, coastal.view said: that is not true dahlen was not held back he could not cut it you and myth making about some of these prospects Did you even read what I said? You're really bad at reading and when you try something else you go the passive aggressive style. It's marvelous that you didn't go the passive aggressive way now, I'm very surprised... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Timråfan Posted March 8, 2020 Share Posted March 8, 2020 22 minutes ago, debluvscanucks said: Petey's MUCH more of a competitor/champion than that. You don't give him enough credit...has NOTHING to do with "feelings". He's made of steel. He's being targeted, big time, as the secret to him is out. But he's so good and is so far away from the drama you suggest that he's actually got little ego and is quite satisfied to help set his brothers up...make more room for them until he finds a way to work around it. Thing is, that will take some of the attention off him, as teams will start thinking "pass" and he'll be more open to shooting. He's been off, but I don't think it's because he's mourning another player...he's too focused for that. He's human and your words don't change that fact. I'm not saying he is mourning another player. I say that Bennings way of dealing with this situation is affecting Petey. It isn't especially good if you don't trust or like your GM. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gurn Posted March 8, 2020 Share Posted March 8, 2020 4 minutes ago, Timråfan said: He's human and your words don't change that fact. I'm not saying he is mourning another player. I say that Bennings way of dealing with this situation is affecting Petey. It isn't especially good if you don't trust or like your GM. 46 minutes ago, Timråfan said: Dahlen didn't force Bennings hands. Benning could have solved this in multiple ways without laying the full blame on Dahlen. Since we don't know exactly what went wrong it's hard for anybody to take a stand. "Since we don't know exactly what went wrong it's hard for anybody to take a stand" And yet you have taken a stand, haven't you? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
73 Percent Posted March 8, 2020 Share Posted March 8, 2020 1 hour ago, Timråfan said: Dahlen didn't force Bennings hands. Benning could have solved this in multiple ways without laying the full blame on Dahlen. Since we don't know exactly what went wrong it's hard for anybody to take a stand. Play me or trade me is how I understood it. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Qwags Posted March 8, 2020 Share Posted March 8, 2020 How many PGTs make it to 50 pages, despite being a two games ago? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Timråfan Posted March 8, 2020 Share Posted March 8, 2020 2 hours ago, gurn said: "Since we don't know exactly what went wrong it's hard for anybody to take a stand" And yet you have taken a stand, haven't you? Only about Bennings words... He could have spoken about the young players not willing to play in AHL in another interview not close to Dahlens departure. Remember, I don't have a problem with Benning wanted to trade him. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuck73_3 Posted March 8, 2020 Share Posted March 8, 2020 4 hours ago, Timråfan said: He's human and your words don't change that fact. I'm not saying he is mourning another player. I say that Bennings way of dealing with this situation is affecting Petey. It isn't especially good if you don't trust or like your GM. The lengths you go to defend a guy who at this point would struggle to make an ECHL team is simply amazing. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted March 8, 2020 Share Posted March 8, 2020 1 hour ago, Timråfan said: Only about Bennings words... He could have spoken about the young players not willing to play in AHL in another interview not close to Dahlens departure. Remember, I don't have a problem with Benning wanted to trade him. Dahlen has no heart to compete against the best. He is happy at the lower levels of play. Petey wants to win. He wants the best players on the ice. If Petey is frustrated about a player, it’s about Loui getting icetime. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coastal.view Posted March 8, 2020 Share Posted March 8, 2020 6 hours ago, Timråfan said: Did you even read what I said? You're really bad at reading and when you try something else you go the passive aggressive style. It's marvelous that you didn't go the passive aggressive way now, I'm very surprised... i disagree i read what you wrote and responded since you have issues about reading comprehension - you raised this, not me i do not think you understand what passive aggressive means i think my post was a pretty direct response to your post pas·sive-ag·gres·sive adjective adjective: passive-aggressive of or denoting a type of behavior or personality characterized by indirect resistance to the demands of others and an avoidance of direct confrontation, as in procrastinating, pouting, or misplacing important materials. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Timråfan Posted March 9, 2020 Share Posted March 9, 2020 1 hour ago, coastal.view said: i disagree i read what you wrote and responded since you have issues about reading comprehension - you raised this, not me i do not think you understand what passive aggressive means i think my post was a pretty direct response to your post pas·sive-ag·gres·sive adjective adjective: passive-aggressive of or denoting a type of behavior or personality characterized by indirect resistance to the demands of others and an avoidance of direct confrontation, as in procrastinating, pouting, or misplacing important materials. You usually are pa but not now. I'm a bit curious to why. No, you didn't respond to my post earlier... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Posted by -SN-,
30 reactions
Go to this post
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now