Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

Mafia: Lombardy

Rate this topic


Zfetch

Recommended Posts

Just now, Qwags said:

I like to think I'm at least a worthwhile meat shield, thank you.

You've upped your game recently, definitely. My consideration of you as 'LHF' is based more off prior reputation and the resulting fact that no one would really take notice in the way they would if BJ had voted, say, Aladeen.

 

Not meant to be an insult.

Link to comment

 

3 minutes ago, Master Radishes said:

Low-hanging fruit.

 

BJ has been sitting in the background, doing little, and then votes Qwags out of nowhere - a target no one is going to step up and defend particularly hard.

 

My vote on him was serious, btw.

Yikes, not a fan of this post either. Qwags has been present in the thread. My vote was to test the reaction and see if it would force a response to Qwags, but MR reacted to it before Qwags did.

 

"Low hanging fruit" doesn't apply in this scenario as well. Qwags is a player not a lot of people have had a lot of strong opinions on. Now this vote gets people talking and Qwags involved as well.

Link to comment
Just now, Blue Jay 22 said:

 

Yikes, not a fan of this post either. Qwags has been present in the thread. My vote was to test the reaction and see if it would force a response to Qwags, but MR reacted to it before Qwags did.

 

"Low hanging fruit" doesn't apply in this scenario as well. Qwags is a player not a lot of people have had a lot of strong opinions on. Now this vote gets people talking and Qwags involved as well.

In that case, it's not a bad move. Getting more people to play allows for more mistakes and slip ups. 

Link to comment
Just now, Blue Jay 22 said:

 

Yikes, not a fan of this post either. Qwags has been present in the thread. My vote was to test the reaction and see if it would force a response to Qwags, but MR reacted to it before Qwags did.

 

"Low hanging fruit" doesn't apply in this scenario as well. Qwags is a player not a lot of people have had a lot of strong opinions on. Now this vote gets people talking and Qwags involved as well.

Ah yes, the 'reaction test' vote. You're definitely townie then. My mistake.

Link to comment

 

7 minutes ago, Master Radishes said:

Low-hanging fruit.

 

BJ has been sitting in the background, doing little, and then votes Qwags out of nowhere - a target no one is going to step up and defend particularly hard.

 

My vote on him was serious, btw.

 

5 minutes ago, Ceres said:

Yeah...

 

Bj suddenly seems opportunistic. 

:lol:

 

Which is it boys? Am I sitting in the background or am I opportunistic.

Link to comment

We should be focusing on falcon45ca.  He's demonstrating a big difference in his play since Round A and has been the most opportunistic in his pursuit of players.

 

naslund.is.king is another guy that we can't let slip either.  He talked a bit too much, and with too much information it seems, about the otherwise/SK situation.

 

 

 

Link to comment
7 minutes ago, Ceres said:

I'm shocked SS isn't even getting included in a lot of these lists. Sure, I'm biased at this point, but I think some of the things I've pointed out are objectively scummy. Maybe he has some teammates that want him alive?

I explained my reasoning on why SS isn’t someone I think we should lynch this round. That still holds true now. But If it came down to thunder dome between you and him at this point I would vote for him. 

Link to comment

 

23 minutes ago, Master Radishes said:

This game has an odd feel to it right now - everyone was a bit deflated or uncertain after discovering Round A meant little, and there's been none of the proper 'game start' we are used to. So content has been hard to generate for everyone, I think.

 

We've got the Ceres/SS brouhaha, Lucky's reveal, Aladeen's case on AV, a bit of light discussion around falcon...that's off the top of my head; anything else?

 

10 minutes ago, Master Radishes said:

Three if you include Lucky, which was admittedly an accident (and also, conversely, an example of scumhunting).

 

As per my above post, this game has floundered. A number of people need to up their content before I or anyone can read them.

 

I'm not going to argue your read on me much. You're welcome to it. I just find it's proving my point - it's a weak case on me, just like every bit of content we've come up with (AV, Lucky, Ceres/SS) has been pretty lacklustre.

 

9 minutes ago, Master Radishes said:

Low-hanging fruit.

 

BJ has been sitting in the background, doing little, and then votes Qwags out of nowhere - a target no one is going to step up and defend particularly hard.

 

My vote on him was serious, btw.

 

7 minutes ago, Master Radishes said:

Also, look, I generated more stuff for us to analyse. Now BJ is getting oddly defensive for a random vote I placed on him with the classic 'MR hasn't done much' line.

Notice how MR's tone has completely done a 180 over the course of 20+ minutes now that there is pressure on him. I haven't seen anyone other than myself pursue him as hard this game, but after my attacks, he goes from "man, this game is floundered, everyone is so deflated, people need to up their content" to a detailed narrative read on me, then immediately pivots to my vote on Qwags without even asking why I voted or waiting for others to react to the vote. MR basically seized on the first thing he could think of to try and make a weak case while pushing a scum narrative.

 

Vote him out.

Link to comment
Just now, Blue Jay 22 said:

Notice how MR's tone has completely done a 180 over the course of 20+ minutes now that there is pressure on him. I haven't seen anyone other than myself pursue him as hard this game, but after my attacks, he goes from "man, this game is floundered, everyone is so deflated, people need to up their content" to a detailed narrative read on me, then immediately pivots to my vote on Qwags without even asking why I voted or waiting for others to react to the vote. MR basically seized on the first thing he could think of to try and make a weak case while pushing a scum narrative.

 

Vote him out.

Here, everyone, I've highlighted the bits where BJ is constructing a narrative to make his case against me seem more substantial than it is.

 

All these points are easily counterable should the need arise for me to do it.

 

This is not vintage BJ.

  • Haha 2
Link to comment

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...