Mafia: Flight of the Dirty Birds - Game Over, TOWN WINS!!

[thejazz97]

Just now, BoKnows said:

No way BJ claims to be sheriff day 1, that would make him such an easy target for the mafia.

so what I’m hearing is we vote BJ.

[naslund.is.king]

Just now, thejazz97 said:

so we ignore it? and what if hoggers turns out to be mafia?

He isnt I’ll give you a pass since you had some time off but come on

we've seen hoggers game enough to know this is not a scum hoggers ffs

 

[thejazz97]

On 7/17/2020 at 12:21 AM, luckylager said:

 

No angleshooting, but feel free to claim your birds if you want. I don't care because it won't matter at all.

 

 

guys this says nothing about hardclaiming

[thejazz97]

Just now, naslund.is.king said:

He isnt I’ll give you a pass since you had some time off but come on

we've seen hoggers game enough to know this is not a scum hoggers ffs

 

oh thanks! I’ll just take your word for it and blindly believe you

[thejazz97]

unvote vote BJ

[BoKnows]

1 minute ago, thejazz97 said:

so what I’m hearing is we vote BJ.

If he survives the night.  If he claimed to be Sheriff he'd be an easy target for Maf Imo.

[thejazz97]

Just now, BoKnows said:

If he survives the night.  If he claimed to be Sheriff he'd be an easy target for Maf Imo.

so did MR, so we have that going for us

[thejazz97]

unvote vote hoggers

[BoKnows]

Just now, thejazz97 said:

so did MR, so we have that going for us

I feel like BJ's claim is fake.  He wouldn't get his results back before nightfall right?

[falcon45ca]

12 minutes ago, thejazz97 said:

wasn’t hoggers found to be mafia? why should I waste a vote

You believe BJ's 1 post claim re: hoggers being ivestigated? You seem very quick to trust what is clearly a not a legit investigation.

[falcon45ca]

7 minutes ago, thejazz97 said:

oh thanks! I’ll just take your word for it and blindly believe you

Why not? You're doing that with BJ's "investigation"

 

[thejazz97]

Just now, falcon45ca said:

You believe BJ's 1 post claim re: hoggers being ivestigated? You seem very quick to trust what is clearly a not a legit investigation.

it’s round 1, anything is more than nothing

[thejazz97]

Just now, falcon45ca said:

Why not? You're doing that with BJ's "investigation"

 

BJ’s claiming, if he’s sheriff there’s weight to it.

 

NIK is covering for hoggers just because

[falcon45ca]

2 minutes ago, thejazz97 said:

it’s round 1, anything is more than nothing

Anything is always more than nothing, they're mutually exclusive terms.

[naslund.is.king]

3 minutes ago, thejazz97 said:

BJ’s claiming, if he’s sheriff there’s weight to it.

 

NIK is covering for hoggers just because

Multiple players have claimed sheriff....

[falcon45ca]

2 minutes ago, thejazz97 said:

BJ’s claiming, if he’s sheriff there’s weight to it.

 

NIK is covering for hoggers just because

Ya, but see here's the odd bit...you say no matter what you're voting DM next round?

 

So if hoggers gets lynched, and flips TP, who you gonna vote for?

[luckylager]

2 minutes ago, falcon45ca said:

Ya, but see here's the odd bit...you say no matter what you're voting DM next round?

 

So if hoggers gets (PECKERED, PECKED TO DEATH OR PTD) and flips TP, who you gonna vote for?

Fixed

[BoKnows]

12 minutes ago, naslund.is.king said:

Multiple players have claimed sheriff....

maybe we have a naive, or paranoid sheriff.

[naslund.is.king]

29 minutes ago, thejazz97 said:

guys this says nothing about hardclaiming

I might have been wrong 

wooooops

If you wanna believe that the sheriff came out in round one go for it

[GoCanucks16]

I mean, the objectively better play to claiming cop is getting hoggers lynched without claiming. But I still don't see why we wouldn't trust BJ on this barring that he retracts the claim.