Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

[PGT] Vancouver Canucks at St. Louis Blues | Aug. 12, 2020 | Canucks lead series 1-0

Rate this topic


-Vintage Canuck-

Recommended Posts

Helluva game:  so great to see us go toe to toe with these guys and not get intimidated by their dirty play.  We clearly have more skill, depth, speed and better goaltending than them, and those things won us the game. 

They will come harder at us and continue to target Hughes and Petey.  As long as those two can avoid injury, though, we'll be fine.  We'll lose a couple of games but win the series.

St. Louis' "heavy" game plan backfired tonight.  They hoped we'd be worn down by the 3rd.  How did that work out?  Fact is our bottom 6 hit their D pretty hard too and by the 3rd, our speed was breaking through.  We can play their game but they can't play ours.  It's a good matchup for us.

  • Cheers 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, oldnews said:

Zack Mac is the perfect complement on that Beagle Motte line imo.   He looked great tonight.

That size, grit and speed added to that top notch shutdown duo - just makes me love watching that line that much more.

Oreskovich-esque?

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Maniwaki Canuck said:

Helluva game:  so great to see us go toe to toe with these guys and not get intimidated by their dirty play.  We clearly have more skill, depth, speed and better goaltending than them, and those things won us the game. 

They will come harder at us and continue to target Hughes and Petey.  As long as those two can avoid injury, though, we'll be fine.  We'll lose a couple of games but win the series.

St. Louis' "heavy" game plan backfired tonight.  They hoped we'd be worn down by the 3rd.  How did that work out?  Fact is our bottom 6 hit their D pretty hard too and by the 3rd, our speed was breaking through.  We can play their game but they can't play ours.  It's a good matchup for us.

Agree - hopefully over a series we can sustain it. 
 

we do need to pick up on our 5 on 5 play. Zone entry still needs work, especially as I believe around 46% of all goals are scored within 5 seconds of gaining the zone, and with our speed and skill we should be doing more with it.

 

also we need to cross the royal road a lot more and with speed prior to shooting.

 

We played well and hopefully will continue to do so, but there are still many Areas we can improve on 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Googlie said:

Only because Sutter was a beast and Roussel was a pest.

 

Jake was a water lily drifting on the pond

:lol: dont know if thats fair. Green used him in pretty short shifts and neither Rous or Jake saw any shifts in the last 9 minutes or so. And as @oldnews pointed out those three together dominated possession. I'd keep that together and see if they can neutralize things that way again. 

  • Cheers 1
  • Vintage 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, vannuck59 said:

Yay he did one thing right while the rest of the team skated their guts out. What a waste of talent.

That “waste of talent” saved a goal. Virtanen had some big hits early in the game as well. There were also a total of 9 penalties in the game, which he saw 28 seconds of power play time and zero time on the PK. He isnt used in those situations, so for a guy getting limited ice time and not seeing any of the special teams ice time, its going to be difficult for him to get into the game. Boeser and Miller had 6:51 PP TOI and Pettersson had 7:01 PP TOI. Virtanen had a total of 9:26 TOI  And was the 3rd lowest forward for TOI. Give the kid some credit for making a great read and saved a goal in his limited ice time and 4th line duties.

  • Thanks 1
  • Vintage 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, IBatch said:

What a great game.  Might have to watch it again.   Just wanted to say how proud I’m of all the players so far.  The vets are showing why JB paid them their big bucks,  Sutter, Beagle, Motte and Roussel have been superb for the most part.   Pearson wow.   LE pk dynamite and allowing Horvat and Pearson to take risks ... and finally the young stars.   I would have been satisfied if their production was maybe half what it is and they all learned some lessons.   That’s pretty much what I expected - after all the last two cores took five plus years to get there and really never amped it up in the post season.   They were still good but didn’t match their regular season production.   What these kids have managed so far is truly incredible when you think about it.   QHs post-game “Honoured” to be receiving the extra attention and punishment.   What a gamer.   Babych wondered how they would do once “Hudson Bay” rules came out - QHs in particular talking about how the shut down Housley to the point he was like JV last game - invisible - at the peak of his powers.   I’m sure big Dave is super stoked with their play so far.   BB is constantly going to the dirty areas...EP seems to get mad and it back-fires a little (so far)...

 

Yes it’s early days yet - but if someone said we’d win four in a row against two of the best defensive teams in the league (that’s not exactly our strong suit - our strong suit is going against offensive teams that take risks)  id probably have laughed and maybe roasted them a little.    
 

Was thinking our window is in two years plus whatever we could manage this year given our cap is going to start pushing quality depth out of the lineup ... but wasn’t expecting us to play this well this soon.  Kudos to TG and staff for getting them all ready.   

 

thats an awesome nickname for Loui - "PK Dynamite" :lol: 

 

  • Cheers 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, UKNuck96 said:

Agree - hopefully over a series we can sustain it. 
 

we do need to pick up on our 5 on 5 play. Zone entry still needs work, especially as I believe around 46% of all goals are scored within 5 seconds of gaining the zone, and with our speed and skill we should be doing more with it.

 

also we need to cross the royal road a lot more and with speed prior to shooting.

 

We played well and hopefully will continue to do so, but there are still many Areas we can improve on 

Sure we could play better.   But when all your vets are playing to their peak and all the young stars aren’t wilting during their first taste of playoff battle and at least matching their regular season production it’s pretty silly to expect much more from the group. 

  • Vintage 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, IBatch said:

Sure we could play better.   But when all your vets are playing to their peak and all the young stars aren’t wilting during their first taste of playoff battle and at least matching their regular season production it’s pretty silly to expect much more from the group. 

I don’t expect any more effort as they seem to be laying it all out there, which is all we can ask for. But there are still areas they can be better with, either with coaching or in game decision making. 
 

not faulting they for trying hard 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, theo5789 said:

Remember all the fire Green talk after the first game against Minni?

Oh you mean before he was forced to insert the line up he should have iced in the first place? The one that's been winning ever since? ::D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, knucklehead91 said:

That “waste of talent” saved a goal. Virtanen had some big hits early in the game as well. There were also a total of 9 penalties in the game, which he saw 28 seconds of power play time and zero time on the PK. He isnt used in those situations, so for a guy getting limited ice time and not seeing any of the special teams ice time, its going to be difficult for him to get into the game. Boeser and Miller had 6:51 PP TOI and Pettersson had 7:01 PP TOI. Virtanen had a total of 9:26 TOI  And was the 3rd lowest forward for TOI. Give the kid some credit for making a great read and saved a goal in his limited ice time and 4th line duties.

I may be wrong but perhaps his lacklustre play is the reason his icetime was so low?  I'm in the camp of being disappointed that from the eyetest his effort doesn't match his skill and ability.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, canuck73_3 said:

Markstrom makes incredible save

 

Hrudey: watch how Schenn holds Edler's stick, great play. 

I thought the play by play and colour were terrible. Lots of useless talk during key moments and failure to comment on key plays. 

  • Cheers 1
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, EdgarM said:

Oh you mean before he was forced to insert the line up he should have iced in the first place? The one that's been winning ever since? ::D

Oh you were calling for LE to be in the lineup? Or for Jake's 8 minutes a night?

 

The majority of the personnel has been the same, it's getting the team to refocus after a nervous start which is what a coach does along with the vets on the team.

Edited by theo5789
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, UKNuck96 said:

Hopefully we can trade rather then lose him at the draft (if JB decides his time is up) However for him if that does happen it might be the kick up the arse he needed to wake up and realise he is drifting and wasting his talent

Exactly. There is a chance the change in scenery changes Jake's attitude. Sucks for us if it happens, insert ghosts of Neely here. Who knows, if Jake can hang around on 1.5 million dollar contracts for a few more years he could be a cheap option for JB. Another 20 goal campaign though and 1.5 million per year will be in his rear view mirror. In the end if it came between losing Guadette or Jake to Seattle, I'd sooner lose Jake.

  • Cheers 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, spook007 said:

Shades of Rat boy....

Don’t expect anything from the league. Maybe if he injures a player. 
He is their Roussel, and if he can get into yhe players head, like his gotten into mine, it’ll be hard to win the series. 
Both Petey and Hughes are and will be targeted. This is the defining moment of how they and the team will cope.
So far so good... 

His unpenalized crosscheck on Petey, and subsequent attempt to knock his head on the ice should warrant a suspension, but won't.  Unfortunately, the players on the ice with Petey aren't first responders... Tanev, Hughes, Boeser.  Miller would, but he is nursing his wrist injury, and was almost an "unfit to play"

 

Time for the line blender for game 2

 

Zack on Petey's line, and Miller drops to center a line between Roussel and Gaudette (Zack played center in Utica, and is a decent faceoff man)

Rest Beagle for a game to let his hand heal a bit, and play Sutter between Motte and Jake (or Bailey, if Green thinks Jake needs a 73rd wake up call)

Replace Fanta with Juolevi, if we need better breakouts from that pairing with Myers, or Benn, if we want more truculence.  Myers and Fanta are not a good pairing. 

 

Games 3 and 4 are back to back, so nagging injuries management needs to be factored in.  For Beagle, one on - one off might accelerate the healing process. (With the luxury of a 1-0 lead, maybe give Graovac a taste ... he's played 70 NHL games,  but never post season)

 

But someone has to neutralize Perron

  • Vintage 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...