Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

Mafia: Super Duper Vanilla Game (Game Over: Mafia Wins!)

Rate this topic


Recommended Posts

Mafia: BJ's Super Duper Vanilla Game

apiex6os1__23459.1528363053.jpg?c=2?imbypass=on

Welcome to Mafia: Super Duper Vanilla. This will be a pretty straightforward, open setup mafia game. No PMing, minimal roles...just straight forward scum hunting for the most part!

 

Gameplay:

This will be an open setup game between 2 factions: the Mafia and the Town. This is a fun game intended for 13 players. 

 

Round Layout:

 

The 1st Round of the game will last 48 hours, then drop to 24 hour cycles upon the start of Round 2 and onwards. Rounds will close at 10:00PM Pacific Time and begin again upon the host's announcement after nightfall. All actions must be submitted before nightfall as well.

 

Game Setup:

 

The game roles/setup is below:

1 Sheriff - Begins the game with an investigation of a random Vanilla townie

1 Doctor

10 Vanilla Town

 

4 Mafia Goons

1 Rolecop

 

Rules:

There is No PMing, and no asking me to kill yourself to let your team gain an advantage...all other standard rules apply.

 

You MUST vote every round...failure to do so will result in a God-Kill.

 

All other Standard Rules apply.

 

Have fun!

 

Edited by Blue Jay 22
  • Like 1
  • Cheers 2
  • Vintage 1
Link to comment

 

Mafia: Super Duper Vanilla Game:

 

Host: Blue Jay 22

 

1. @Alain Vigneault

2. @Aladeen

3. @Sharpshooter

4. @milk and honey

5. @hoggers

6. @falcon45ca

7. @BoKnows

8. @DarthMelvin

9. @luckylager

10. @ilduce39

11. @Zfetch

12. @naslund.is.king

13. @Master Radishes

14. @TheRocket18

15. @J-23

16. @GoCanucks16

17. @Lewitelli

Edited by Blue Jay 22
  • Cheers 2
Link to comment
8 hours ago, Blue Jay 22 said:

 

 

You MUST vote every round...failure to do so will result in a God-Kill.

 

 

 

That is harsh.

 

I think we need to change our general approach to handling inactive players because Godkills should be used as an extreme measure. First off all, I don't think activity requirements should be purely based on how often someone is voting, whether it be once every round or once every two rounds. Imo it should be based on how much they are posting and contributing. A player voting every round while posting nothing else shouldn't be meeting any requirements. Conversely, a player contributing each round that happens to forget to vote once or twice should never be GKd or removed; players don't have to vote to be doing work.

 

Second, trying to avoid the GKs all together is probably ideal as they are very unhealthy for the game. By this I mean being careful about letting in players that probably are not going to meet your requirements. And also potentially trying to find a sub if a player is inactive and needs replacement in the early game.

The same standard should be used universally however. So if you would try to sub out a player with a power-role instead of GKing them, then the same should be done with VTs. And if you GK a VT for not meeting requirements then you have to be prepared to do the same to mafia or power roles as well.

  • Cheers 1
Link to comment
2 hours ago, Ceres said:

That is harsh.

 

I think we need to change our general approach to handling inactive players because Godkills should be used as an extreme measure. First off all, I don't think activity requirements should be purely based on how often someone is voting, whether it be once every round or once every two rounds. Imo it should be based on how much they are posting and contributing. A player voting every round while posting nothing else shouldn't be meeting any requirements. Conversely, a player contributing each round that happens to forget to vote once or twice should never be GKd or removed; players don't have to vote to be doing work.

 

Second, trying to avoid the GKs all together is probably ideal as they are very unhealthy for the game. By this I mean being careful about letting in players that probably are not going to meet your requirements. And also potentially trying to find a sub if a player is inactive and needs replacement in the early game.

The same standard should be used universally however. So if you would try to sub out a player with a power-role instead of GKing them, then the same should be done with VTs. And if you GK a VT for not meeting requirements then you have to be prepared to do the same to mafia or power roles as well.

Sign up to play, & vote for the change YOU want to see in a Mafia game today!

  • Wat 1
Link to comment

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...