Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

WCSF: (2) Colorado Avalanche vs. (3) Dallas Stars | Stars win series 4-3

Rate this topic


2020 Stanley Cup Playoffs | Round 2  

101 members have voted

  1. 1. Who will win the series?

    • Avalanche in 4
    • Avalanche in 5
    • Avalanche in 6
    • Avalanche in 7
    • Stars in 4
    • Stars in 5
      0
    • Stars in 6
    • Stars in 7

This poll is closed to new votes

  • Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.
  • Poll closed on 08/25/2020 at 01:45 AM

Recommended Posts

53 minutes ago, Trebreh said:

watching this series compared to ours.. theres not a lot of charges and extra shoves in between whistles, but with our series you see the Knights and the Blues taking charges at our players and extra crosschecks and not being called. 

 

 

Man wish we were playing the Avs instead of all these heavy goons on skates.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, -Vintage Canuck- said:

Two games in, 34.65% of the poll is already wrong.

 

On 8/23/2020 at 9:37 AM, aGENT said:

I voted Avs in 6 as I'm a fan of their team (I also think the Canucks match up against them better than the Stars, so there's some wishful thinking there, should we make it through Vegas). But Dallas is far from the push over many on CDC have been claiming they are, even since the beginning of last round. They're a GOOD and playoff built team.

 

And now with Gruber out...Can I revise my vote? :lol:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, aGENT said:

Hair splitting?

 

I mean Benn got sat for Fanta at points this season. 

We’re also not the team that a lot of people picked to come out of the West.

 

Not sure why we would even need to compare our depth to theirs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DeNiro said:

We’re also not the team that a lot of people picked to come out of the West.

 

Not sure why we would even need to compare our depth to theirs.

That would be on the strength of guys like MacKinnon, Rantanen, Makar etc, not their 7th D.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, aGENT said:

That would be on the strength of guys like MacKinnon, Rantanen, Makar etc, not their 7th D.

A team that is expected to challenge for the Cup should have at least 7 or 8 NHL D men.
 

Connauton as a number 7 is weak depth on a contender.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, DeNiro said:

A team that is expected to challenge for the Cup should have at least 7 or 8 NHL D men.
 

Connauton as a number 7 is weak depth on a contender.

Not if you have a number 1 who can play 30 mins a night, which they do in Heiskanen. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, aGENT said:

Exhibit A of why some of us hate the inconsistent, garbage reffing in this league. It's not just 'Canuck-whining'.

Agreed, I was just thinking of that highlight earlier.

They called it good battles on one of the panels and talked about whistles going away as the rounds go deeper. It's hogwash.

On that play if Pavelski had battled 'smarter' and not harder and did something like lift Zadorov's leg at the knee causing him to lose balance and go down, I would imagine that would have got called. Because now you have a situation where the refs decide what is accepted in these so called 'battles' that are usually all called penalties.

 

It's like the refs get to be purposely inconsistent because its' the play offs...again hogwash.

  • Vintage 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DeNiro said:

A team that is expected to challenge for the Cup should have at least 7 or 8 NHL D men.
 

Connauton as a number 7 is weak depth on a contender.

He's played 314 NHL games (+5 playoffs). I think that qualifies him as a (depth) NHL defenseman.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...