Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

[Signing] Penguins re-sign Jared McCann


Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, CRAZY_4_NAZZY said:

Yuck GIFs | Tenor

 

But all seriousness, weren't the Penguins trying to shop him?  A little surprised they signed him.

They still could, McCann for Staal would have been a better return for Minny imo. Jake should sign a 2 year 5-5.5m deal after seeing this. Slight pay edge to McCann as he can play C.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Nuxfanabroad said:

Honestly, would like to see Pitt crash hard. The Minny-mee's hold their 2021 1st, so that fade-out(ala SJ pick to OTT style) makes for entertaining viewing.

 

So often the Pens have been 1 lost paycheque from living rough; then they wind up with Mario, Jags, Cros & Malk beasties. Not fair!

Canucks could have drafted Jagr over Nedved...only if you could have do overs for all your picks down the road !

  • Vintage 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, DeNiro said:

There’s the price for Virtanen.

 

Hopefully slightly less.

Doesn’t matter. He is as good as gone. Trade bait for sure. JB already called him out for not performing as well as he should have (which was a bit foolish for trade marketability). 

Canuck Prioritization: 

Marky

Toffoli

Tanev

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Nuxfanabroad said:

Honestly, would like to see Pitt crash hard. The Minny-mee's hold their 2021 1st, so that fade-out(ala SJ pick to OTT style) makes for entertaining viewing.

 

So often the Pens have been 1 lost paycheque from living rough; then they wind up with Mario, Jags, Cros & Malk beasties. Not fair!

while I mostly agree, Us complaining about Jagr is like Philly complaining that we were gifted Pettersson

  • Cheers 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Elias Pettersson said:

Well at least we know Jake won't get more than $3 million.  Should we still trade him?  I think it's best to keep him around another year and see how Kole Lind develops.  If Lind can replace him on the 3rd line then we can flip Jake for a pick prior to the expansion draft.

Another thought would be to expose Jake in expansion.  All those tools could be tempting no?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, grandmaster said:

Doesn’t matter. He is as good as gone. Trade bait for sure. JB already called him out for not performing as well as he should have (which was a bit foolish for trade marketability). 

Canuck Prioritization: 

Marky

Toffoli

Tanev

Maybe it seems foolish for trade marketability because it was actually geared toward contract negotiations

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...