Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

[Trade] Predators trade Nick Bonino, 2020 2nd-round pick, 2020 3rd-round pick to Wild for Luke Kunin, 2020 4th-round pick


Recommended Posts

45 minutes ago, Gollumpus said:

Cap dump.

 

               regards,  G.

Wouldn't think so.

 

Bonino was Nashville's best centre last year - I know that's not saying much but he was their only consistently reliable F.  His line outscored opponents 47 to 28.  The Predators apparently received plenty of interest at the TDL despite him having an additional year.  Maybe that has changed with the pandemic.

 

Hynes is full of praise for Bonino.  He only has 1 year left while Kunin is only 22 with many years of team control ahead.  Guerin obviously knows Bonino from his time in Pittsburgh.  

 

Kunin was drafted 15th overall in 2016 and has played only 135 NHL games. Nashville is paying for the team control and the potential upside.

 

Kunin has impeccable work ethic - works really hard on the ice but doesn't have a standout skill.  He's kind of the all around average.  The Wild have kind of been stuck at average and it got them nowhere.  So I am guessing that's maybe why they decided they could part with still such a young player.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Junkyard Dog said:

Wonder what they’re planning. Pietrangelo? Hall?  

If they're as high on Fabbro as they claim to be I don't see them targeting Pietrangelo. Would be interesting to see if they make a move on Hall. Not sure if LW is just really weak or the truly like playing right handed wingers Forsberg and Arvidsson on the LW. But Hall would be by far their best left handed LWer. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, mll said:

Wouldn't think so.

 

Bonino was Nashville's best centre last year - I know that's not saying much but he was their only consistently reliable F.  His line outscored opponents 47 to 28.  The Predators apparently received plenty of interest at the TDL despite him having an additional year.  Maybe that has changed with the pandemic.

 

Hynes is full of praise for Bonino.  He only has 1 year left while Kunin is only 22 with many years of team control ahead.  Guerin obviously knows Bonino from his time in Pittsburgh.  

 

Kunin was drafted 15th overall in 2016 and has played only 135 NHL games. Nashville is paying for the team control and the potential upside.

 

Kunin has impeccable work ethic - works really hard on the ice but doesn't have a standout skill.  He's kind of the all around average.  The Wild have kind of been stuck at average and it got them nowhere.  So I am guessing that's maybe why they decided they could part with still such a young player.  

 

Dump is probably a bit harsh. While no Miller, it's not dissimilar in that they felt the need/pressure to move that cap out. The reason we got Miller so cheap I'd the same reason MIN got two picks and Bonino so cheap.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, mll said:

Wouldn't think so.

 

Bonino was Nashville's best centre last year - I know that's not saying much but he was their only consistently reliable F.  His line outscored opponents 47 to 28.  The Predators apparently received plenty of interest at the TDL despite him having an additional year.  Maybe that has changed with the pandemic.

 

Hynes is full of praise for Bonino.  He only has 1 year left while Kunin is only 22 with many years of team control ahead.  Guerin obviously knows Bonino from his time in Pittsburgh.  

 

Kunin was drafted 15th overall in 2016 and has played only 135 NHL games. Nashville is paying for the team control and the potential upside.

 

Kunin has impeccable work ethic - works really hard on the ice but doesn't have a standout skill.  He's kind of the all around average.  The Wild have kind of been stuck at average and it got them nowhere.  So I am guessing that's maybe why they decided they could part with still such a young player.  

 

 

2 minutes ago, aGENT said:

Dump is probably a bit harsh. While no Miller, it's not dissimilar in that they felt the need/pressure to move that cap out. The reason we got Miller so cheap I'd the same reason MIN got two picks and Bonino so cheap.

Hence my teasing remark of this being a "cap dump". It seems to be that on these forums one man's cap dump is another man's good trade...

 

Otherwise, hey it's sunny out there, or at least it's daylight. Go for a walk with your dog, or borrow someone else's dog.

 

                                                   regards,  G.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, N7Nucks said:

If they're as high on Fabbro as they claim to be I don't see them targeting Pietrangelo. Would be interesting to see if they make a move on Hall. Not sure if LW is just really weak or the truly like playing right handed wingers Forsberg and Arvidsson on the LW. But Hall would be by far their best left handed LWer. 

Arvidsson plays exclusively RW.  Their top-line is nicknamed the JOFA line for Forsberg-Johansen-Arvidsson.  They were broken up but Hynes re-united them for the play-ins and Poile talked of how that had him excited because they also played well.  If they acquire Hall he would probably play with Duchene.

 

Edited by mll
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, aGENT said:

Dump is probably a bit harsh. While no Miller, it's not dissimilar in that they felt the need/pressure to move that cap out. The reason we got Miller so cheap I'd the same reason MIN got two picks and Bonino so cheap.

This makes more sense. 

  • Cheers 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well they are rebuilding.. they are getting rid off old core, traded Dubnyk,Staal, didn't re-sign Koivu, they aquired some placeholder players on short term contracts like Bjugstad,Bonino,Johansson and also got good draft picks, in 2-3 years they might be fun to watch with Fiala,Kaprizov,Boldy,Rossi,Khusnutdinov...

Edited by Kosatka
  • Cheers 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bonino is a proven winner who Guerin is familiar with from their time in Pittsburgh. Not sold on the selections they made with the picks they acquired, but time will tell. 

Kunin is a good young player, and Nashville freed up some space for a potential big free agent addition. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, N7Nucks said:

If they're as high on Fabbro as they claim to be I don't see them targeting Pietrangelo. Would be interesting to see if they make a move on Hall. Not sure if LW is just really weak or the truly like playing right handed wingers Forsberg and Arvidsson on the LW. But Hall would be by far their best left handed LWer. 

Looks like that could be the case re Taylor Hall.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Kosatka said:

Well they are rebuilding.. they are getting rid off old core, traded Dubnyk,Staal, didn't re-sign Koivu, they aquired some placeholder players on short term contracts like Bjugstad,Bonino,Johansson and also got good draft picks, in 2-3 years they might be fun to watch with Fiala,Kaprizov,Boldy,Rossi,Khusnutdinov...

however, they just traded a talented 15th overall pick - and returned trade-downs ie a 2nd and a 3rd round pick - (the latter a mere trade up on the 4th they gave back)....

 

So in the "rebuilding" stage you refer to, they got a 2nd round pick and one round trade up to a 3rd....for a 15th overall....and a 'placeholder'.   Kunin, the principal here - is worth more than that, so he spent considerable value on that 'placeholder'.

 

The Bonino part of this deal is generally an excellent acquisition - however, in a flat cap world, and with one year of term remaining, his value is mitigated to a rental   He's a good rental - might return another pick, but still, dividing assets again and using a 15th overall pick/young player to do so.  This is less a 'rebuild' move than the deals Benning made for younger roster principals/players...deals which were criticized to no end.....but the 'rebuild logic' of Guerin's move, is even lesser imo - unless one accepts/realizes what a 33? yr old like Bonino brings, even in a 'rebuild'.

 

Instead of using Kunin to buy a second, they quite easily 'could have' retained him and taken on a year of cap (ie the Staal deal to Detroit)  - in exchange for a pick...a 'rebuild' move...instead he moved a 15th overall prospect....It can only be made sense of if looked at outside the cookie cutter lens/concept of a 'rebuild'.

 

Edited by oldnews
  • Cheers 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...