JM_ Posted June 10, 2021 Share Posted June 10, 2021 5 minutes ago, DeNiro said: Him or Trochek are good with me. Jenner's on a cheaper deal, but Trochek probably has more offensive upside. I guess it depends what Jim and Green have planned for fit. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JM_ Posted June 10, 2021 Share Posted June 10, 2021 1 minute ago, Dats hockey said: Cost effectiveness isn’t there for me, seen a lot of Jenner game. Him in the playoff is just slightly better than Jake. And he on a downward trend also just to be clear, are you comparing Virtanen to Jenner? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HKSR Posted June 10, 2021 Share Posted June 10, 2021 2 hours ago, Bure_Pavel said: My best guess at the moment how the draft plays out: 1. Power 2. Beniers 3. Clarke 4. Hughes 5. Eklund 6. Edvinsson 7. Guenther 8. Johnson 9. McTavish Really glad the Canucks didn't drop in the lottery. Like GMJB said, I think there's a really good Top 9. Maybe Top 10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smithers joe Posted June 10, 2021 Share Posted June 10, 2021 14 minutes ago, Jimmy McGill said: why? he's good on face offs, plays physical and can provide some offence. Seems like a great solution to our 3C problem to me. is he a better play driver than miller? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
73 Percent Posted June 10, 2021 Share Posted June 10, 2021 2 minutes ago, smithers joe said: is he a better play driver than miller? What's that have to do with anything? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JM_ Posted June 10, 2021 Share Posted June 10, 2021 (edited) 4 minutes ago, smithers joe said: is he a better play driver than miller? I would think he'd be more on the defensive end than Miller. So it really depends on what Benning is looking at doing, more of a change to a higher scoring 3rd line or more of a harder checking line. Edited June 10, 2021 by Jimmy McGill Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted June 10, 2021 Share Posted June 10, 2021 I like this Lambos kid some too. Solidly built puck moving D. Looks like he will go in the 10-20 range. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dats hockey Posted June 10, 2021 Share Posted June 10, 2021 49 minutes ago, Jimmy McGill said: just to be clear, are you comparing Virtanen to Jenner? We don’t need more players that hide in the playoffs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JM_ Posted June 10, 2021 Share Posted June 10, 2021 7 minutes ago, Dats hockey said: We don’t need more players that hide in the playoffs I think you have Jenner confused with someone else. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aardvark Posted June 10, 2021 Share Posted June 10, 2021 3 hours ago, theo5789 said: Maybe more like Jared Staal or as referenced above Jordan Subban. Both these guys were hyped up to be the "best of the brothers" too I believe. Curious if there are any "3rd brother" that has actually done well in the league... Duane Sutter did pretty well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nucker 67 Posted June 10, 2021 Share Posted June 10, 2021 It's VAN's turn to pick. Johnson, Lysell, Lambos, Lucius, Svechkov, Raty and Sillinger are left. What does Jim do? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeNiro Posted June 10, 2021 Share Posted June 10, 2021 4 minutes ago, NUCKER67 said: It's VAN's turn to pick. Johnson, Lysell, Lambos, Lucius, Svechkov, Raty and Sillinger are left. What does Jim do? Johnson or Lysell. I would lean on Gradin on that one. If he sees another Pettersson in Lysell it’s a no brainer. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nucker 67 Posted June 10, 2021 Share Posted June 10, 2021 Just now, DeNiro said: Johnson or Lysell. I would lean on Gradin on that one. If he sees another Pettersson in Lysell it’s a no brainer. Yes, probably a great pick at #10. The Hockey Writers final draft rankings have Lysell at #5. Lysell with Pettersson or Hoglander, could be very exciting hockey. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Herberts Vasiljevs Posted June 10, 2021 Share Posted June 10, 2021 8 minutes ago, NUCKER67 said: It's VAN's turn to pick. Johnson, Lysell, Lambos, Lucius, Svechkov, Raty and Sillinger are left. What does Jim do? Lysell. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeNiro Posted June 10, 2021 Share Posted June 10, 2021 Just now, NUCKER67 said: Yes, probably a great pick at #10. The Hockey Writers final draft rankings have Lysell at #5. Lysell with Pettersson or Hoglander, could be very exciting hockey. Very dynamic line for sure. The question would be is it too soft? Im all for building a skilled roster but as all the teams who are having success are showing you need a balance. Maybe that means McTavish or Guenther are the better pick for us now. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theo5789 Posted June 10, 2021 Share Posted June 10, 2021 9 minutes ago, NUCKER67 said: It's VAN's turn to pick. Johnson, Lysell, Lambos, Lucius, Svechkov, Raty and Sillinger are left. What does Jim do? For me, it's Svechkov from that list. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeNiro Posted June 10, 2021 Share Posted June 10, 2021 (edited) 1 minute ago, theo5789 said: For me, it's Svechkov from that list. I don’t think we make that pick unless we trade down. Too much chance he ends up being a third liner. Edited June 10, 2021 by DeNiro Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Herberts Vasiljevs Posted June 10, 2021 Share Posted June 10, 2021 Just now, DeNiro said: Very dynamic line for sure. The question would be is it too soft? Im all for building a skilled roster but as all the teams who are having success are showing you need a balance. Maybe that means McTavish or Guenther are the better pick for us now. Lysell definitely doesn't play soft. Like Hoglander, he's small (albeit he has a different build) but isn't a soft player. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeNiro Posted June 10, 2021 Share Posted June 10, 2021 Just now, Herberts Vasiljevs said: Lysell definitely doesn't play soft. Like Hoglander, he's small (albeit he has a different build) but isn't a soft player. Size does still matter in the playoffs though. Nice that he doesnt play soft but he clearly doesn’t have the size. What happens when we’re getting shut down by a team with big defensemen? That’s when you need a big body player to get in on the forecheck. Look at how Colorado and Vegas’ top lines are built. All skilled players but they’re big and strong too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theo5789 Posted June 10, 2021 Share Posted June 10, 2021 4 minutes ago, DeNiro said: I don’t think we make that pick unless we trade down. Too much chance he ends up being a third liner. His floor is probably a 3rd liner. He could just as easily be a dynamic two way first line center. Could have chemistry with Podkolzin for the Russian connection, but also be skilled enough to play alongside the likes on Petey (if he can't get his faceoff game going and is bumped to wing). A lot of those skilled offensive guys could be top 6 players, but they also could be complete duds if not given the offensive opportunity (they would have to earn it). I would think McTavish is more likely to be a 3rd liner and yet many on here would welcome him. I just think Svechkov in comparison gives up some physicality, but has higher offensive upside than McTavish. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now