JM_ Posted June 28, 2021 Share Posted June 28, 2021 1 minute ago, janisahockeynut said: Well, remember that who I want in the pick we have, but Ceulemans seems like a reach and I don't think we have to go that low.... It should be interesting......... well sure Clarke is a no-brainer, but if both Johnson and Ceulemans are there at 9, and you have them only 2 spots apart, why not go RHD? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bertuzzipunch Posted June 28, 2021 Share Posted June 28, 2021 16 minutes ago, janisahockeynut said: I have working on that........ I am so RHD crazy this year, I have to watch my self a little..... #1. Morrow #2. Mailloux #3. Schmidt #4. Heimosalmi #5. Bar Or Forwards #1. Rosen #2. Boucher #3. Helenius #4. Samoskevich For me, if we get Clarke, then we take a forward......BPA or course If we take a Forward, then we take a couple of RHD in the 2nd and 3rd...Morrow is probably gone in the 1st, but we would surely get one of the other 4 I am getting excited for the draft Man mailloux and schmidt are so raw. You imagine if we drafted one or both of them this year and properly groomed them. Really hope the team is focusing on rhd this draft. Next year we do need to go back to find a LHD or 2 tho. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J.I.A.H.N Posted June 28, 2021 Share Posted June 28, 2021 5 minutes ago, Jimmy McGill said: well sure Clarke is a no-brainer, but if both Johnson and Ceulemans are there at 9, and you have them only 2 spots apart, why not go RHD? Sure, then you go for the RHD, but you would have passed on other guys, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J.I.A.H.N Posted June 28, 2021 Share Posted June 28, 2021 2 minutes ago, Bertuzzipunch said: Man mailloux and schmidt are so raw. You imagine if we drafted one or both of them this year and properly groomed them. Really hope the team is focusing on rhd this draft. Next year we do need to go back to find a LHD or 2 tho. I seen mailloux as high as 15th mid-season. Keeping in mind he did not play much, if at all. So he dropped. LHD? what are you talking about, LOL. All our LHD are young. Next year, we look at obviously BPA, but forward, and goalie Usually, goalies start in the second round, and I would be just fine with taking one there next year Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JM_ Posted June 28, 2021 Share Posted June 28, 2021 6 minutes ago, janisahockeynut said: Sure, then you go for the RHD, but you would have passed on other guys, right? true, but you have one small dude and a bad skater ahead of him. I was just wondering why you had him so high when he seems to be pegged more around the back 1/3 of the 1st round. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J.I.A.H.N Posted June 28, 2021 Share Posted June 28, 2021 Just now, Jimmy McGill said: true, but you have one small dude and a bad skater ahead of him. I was just wondering why you had him so high when he seems to be pegged more around the back 1/3 of the 1st round. Who Ceulemans? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JM_ Posted June 28, 2021 Share Posted June 28, 2021 1 minute ago, janisahockeynut said: Who Ceulemans? yup, I'm seeing him all over the back of the 1st on a number of rankings. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J.I.A.H.N Posted June 28, 2021 Share Posted June 28, 2021 I get him more around 14 to 17 ish? But since he is a RHD AND I seen him at the U18's, I like him To be honest.....my line is around Johnson, but I think guys like Raty will show well in the NHl in 3 years...just a feeling I love Svechkov and McTavish also 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bertuzzipunch Posted June 28, 2021 Share Posted June 28, 2021 13 minutes ago, janisahockeynut said: Sure, then you go for the RHD, but you would have passed on other guys, right? Besides the ones on the team do we have any prospects? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J.I.A.H.N Posted June 28, 2021 Share Posted June 28, 2021 Just now, Bertuzzipunch said: Besides the ones on the team do we have any prospects? I think Woo will be fine Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JM_ Posted June 28, 2021 Share Posted June 28, 2021 1 minute ago, janisahockeynut said: I get him more around 14 to 17 ish? But since he is a RHD AND I seen him at the U18's, I like him To be honest.....my line is around Johnson, but I think guys like Raty will show well in the NHl in 3 years...just a feeling I love Svechkov and McTavish also ah OK. Its such a weird draft. NHL has him at 14 for NAm skaters. and the draft analyst has him at 51. Quite the spread. If the hockey analyst dude is right, maybe we snag him at 41 anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nucker 67 Posted June 28, 2021 Share Posted June 28, 2021 (edited) This could be the last time the Canucks draft in the Top 10 for some time, if things go right. It's a very important decision that #9 pick. Drafting a winger (Guenther, Johnson, Lysell) seems like a miss to me. Choosing a Dman with the #9 is fine, but only if he's going to be great. "Good" Dmen (like Juoelvi for example) in the Top 10 is risky. I would say take Power, Clarke or Hughes if available. If not then move on. I'm hoping for a C, as the Canucks C depth is very poor. This is an important pick, Cs are also important. I'd go with Beniers, Eklund or McTavish). If they're gone, move on. I'll just assume that Power and Beniers will be gone, 'cause they will be. If Clarke, Hughes, McTavish and Eklund are gone - take Wallstedt. Drafting a future #1 elite goaltender is never a bad idea. My List: Power Beniers Clarke Eklund McTavish Hughes Wallstedt Edit - I realize there are only 7 players, so if they're gone, trade the pick Edited June 28, 2021 by NUCKER67 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gawdzukes Posted June 28, 2021 Share Posted June 28, 2021 35 minutes ago, Jimmy McGill said: The Hockey Guy had a pretty unflattering take on Lysell, so good to see him down your list. Apparently there are concerns with a big attitude. I'm curious about your ranking of Johnson and Ceulemans so close at 9 and 11. If they are that close, shouldn't we take the RHD? Yeah Ceulemans looks pretty darn good. 200 lbs 6"2 RHD. Older review but looks pretty good when thinking about our group. https://lastwordonsports.com/hockey/2021/05/27/corson-ceulemans-scouting-report/ 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted June 28, 2021 Share Posted June 28, 2021 1 minute ago, NUCKER67 said: This could be the last time the Canucks draft in the Top 10 for some time, if things go right. It's a very important decision that #9 pick. Drafting a winger (Guenther, Johnson, Lysell) seems like a miss to me. Choosing a Dman with the #9 is fine, but only if he's going to be great. "Good" Dmen (like Juoelvi for example) in the Top 10 is risky. I would say take Power, Clarke or Hughes if available. If not then move on. I'm hoping for a C, as the Canucks C depth is very poor. This is an important pick, Cs are also important. I'd go with Beniers, Eklund or McTavish). If they're gone, move on. I'll just assume that Power and Beniers will be gone, 'cause they will be. If Clarke, Hughes, McTavish and Eklund are gone - take Wallstedt. Drafting a future #1 elite goaltender is never a bad idea. My List: Power Beniers Clarke Eklund McTavish Hughes Wallstedt What if all 7 on your list are gone? Those guys certainly all could be. Trade down? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J.I.A.H.N Posted June 28, 2021 Share Posted June 28, 2021 3 minutes ago, Jimmy McGill said: ah OK. Its such a weird draft. NHL has him at 14 for NAm skaters. and the draft analyst has him at 51. Quite the spread. If the hockey analyst dude is right, maybe we snag him at 41 anyway. Matbe, but I think he is gone in the teens.....I would be suprised.......but stranger things happen 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nicklas Bo Hunter Posted June 28, 2021 Share Posted June 28, 2021 Late round pick tag bertuzzi please 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JM_ Posted June 28, 2021 Share Posted June 28, 2021 2 minutes ago, Gawdzukes said: Yeah Ceulemans looks pretty darn good. 200 lbs 6"2 RHD. Older review but looks pretty good when thinking about our group. https://lastwordonsports.com/hockey/2021/05/27/corson-ceulemans-scouting-report/ nice, thanks. Maybe if we end up doing a deal with CHI e.g., and moving down a bit, picking Ceulemans at 12 won't seem as big of a reach. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gawdzukes Posted June 28, 2021 Share Posted June 28, 2021 (edited) 26 minutes ago, Bertuzzipunch said: Man mailloux and schmidt are so raw. You imagine if we drafted one or both of them this year and properly groomed them. Really hope the team is focusing on rhd this draft. Next year we do need to go back to find a LHD or 2 tho. 8 RHD drafted this year, or 5 and 3 LHD? Edited June 28, 2021 by Gawdzukes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beary Sweet Posted June 28, 2021 Share Posted June 28, 2021 Is there any player y’all want really badly and would trade up for? I’d trade up for Clarke. RHD like him don’t grow on trees. He has top notch potential and I see him being a Klingberg type of player, maybe even OEL. He’s tall and can be a efficient player you can put on your PP and PK. I’d trade to 5 or 6 if he’s still available 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted June 28, 2021 Share Posted June 28, 2021 1 minute ago, Gawdzukes said: Yeah Ceulemans looks pretty darn good. 200 lbs 6"2 RHD. Older review but looks pretty good when thinking about our group. https://lastwordonsports.com/hockey/2021/05/27/corson-ceulemans-scouting-report/ In the U18’s I though Ceulemans played with some meanness. He might mature into a really good top minute guy. Maybe like a Brent Seabrook? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now