Alflives Posted July 3, 2021 Share Posted July 3, 2021 2 minutes ago, DontMessMe said: no. I would switch picks with Calgary if you are really that high on him. Move back to 12 and get a 2nd round pick And Calgary can haunt us for the next decade + with Wally Na. Flames suck old smelly socks, so Wally will turn into Waldo. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustABandwagoner Posted July 3, 2021 Share Posted July 3, 2021 1 minute ago, Alflives said: Na. Flames suck old smelly socks, so Wally will turn into Waldo. HEY BE NICE TO WALDO 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nucker 67 Posted July 3, 2021 Share Posted July 3, 2021 11 minutes ago, Bertuzzipunch said: Fine, 9OA to winnipeg for appleton and 17OA we pick corson at 17 Appleton would be the perfect #3C. Although, I think Ceulemans will be more of a 2nd pairing type of Dman. I think I'd still prefer a Lambos-Hughes pairing though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bertuzzipunch Posted July 3, 2021 Share Posted July 3, 2021 10 minutes ago, DontMessMe said: no. I would switch picks with Calgary if you are really that high on him. Move back to 12 and get a 2nd round pick And Calgary can haunt us for the next decade + with Wally Wallstead? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nave Posted July 3, 2021 Share Posted July 3, 2021 I think we got to do all we can to get Eklund, Clarke, or Hughes. If we can't, the fallback option is trading our pick for Sam Reinhart. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bertuzzipunch Posted July 3, 2021 Share Posted July 3, 2021 Just now, Nave said: I think we got to do all we can to get Eklund, Clarke, or Hughes. If we can't, the fallback option is trading our pick for Sam Reinhart. All 3 will be gone 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted July 3, 2021 Share Posted July 3, 2021 1 minute ago, Nave said: I think we got to do all we can to get Eklund, Clarke, or Hughes. If we can't, the fallback option is trading our pick for Sam Reinhart. Pick 41 might be enough (with a b prospect added) to get us Rhino. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nave Posted July 3, 2021 Share Posted July 3, 2021 6 minutes ago, Bertuzzipunch said: All 3 will be gone That's why I think we should trade up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted July 3, 2021 Share Posted July 3, 2021 Just now, Nave said: That's why I think we should trade up. Cost? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nave Posted July 3, 2021 Share Posted July 3, 2021 3 minutes ago, Alflives said: Cost? That's for Benning to figure out, haha. To start, I would trade our 1st and 2nd. I know a lot of people are excited about who might be there in the 2nd round, but I would go for quality over quantity. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nave Posted July 3, 2021 Share Posted July 3, 2021 (edited) 17 minutes ago, Alflives said: Pick 41 might be enough (with a b prospect added) to get us Rhino. I find that hard to believe. He was pretty much the only Sabre that actually played well last year. Edit: Would definitely go for it though. Edited July 3, 2021 by Nave Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted July 3, 2021 Share Posted July 3, 2021 17 minutes ago, Nave said: I find that hard to believe. He was pretty much the only Sabre that actually played well last year. Edit: Would definitely go for it though. Rhino is a one year rental, isn’t he? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bertuzzipunch Posted July 3, 2021 Share Posted July 3, 2021 5 minutes ago, Alflives said: Rhino is a one year rental, isn’t he? He is Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted July 3, 2021 Share Posted July 3, 2021 Just now, Bertuzzipunch said: He is Then isn’t his value lower, because the acquiring team still has to get a new deal done? I definitely wouldn’t be happy with giving up 9OA for a rental. Plus, the cost of resigning Rhino might be too much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bertuzzipunch Posted July 3, 2021 Share Posted July 3, 2021 2 minutes ago, Alflives said: Then isn’t his value lower, because the acquiring team still has to get a new deal done? I definitely wouldn’t be happy with giving up 9OA for a rental. Plus, the cost of resigning Rhino might be too much. We wouldnt trade for him unless an agreement was made with him before hand imo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted July 3, 2021 Share Posted July 3, 2021 Just now, Bertuzzipunch said: We wouldnt trade for him unless an agreement was made with him before hand imo. Even so his agreed to extension could be too pricey, and make him a toxic contract. Is Rhino a six million dollar player, because it might that to extend him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nicklas Bo Hunter Posted July 3, 2021 Share Posted July 3, 2021 Vancouver trade dipetro to Detroit for rfa rights to tyler bertuzzi and then use 9th for wallstedt.... that would be pretty sick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nucker 67 Posted July 3, 2021 Share Posted July 3, 2021 14 minutes ago, Nicklas Bo Hunter said: Vancouver trade dipetro to Detroit for rfa rights to tyler bertuzzi and then use 9th for wallstedt.... that would be pretty sick. But if Wallstedt is taken early, do they pick Cossa at #9? Or do they run with Silovs? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RetroCanuck Posted July 4, 2021 Share Posted July 4, 2021 (edited) 1 hour ago, NUCKER67 said: But if Wallstedt is taken early, do they pick Cossa at #9? Or do they run with Silovs? Draft a goalie later in the draft, limited scouting and might get a steal. But you run with Demko and sign UFA's as backups for the next 5 years regardless. Plenty more drafts. With all that said I wouldn't trade Dipietro. Our greatest area of strength is LD. Juolevi or Rathbone are our most valuable pieces. Miller + Rathbone + 3rd to the Rangers for 15OA + Kravtsov Edited July 4, 2021 by RetroCanuck Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beary Sweet Posted July 4, 2021 Share Posted July 4, 2021 Here’s my shot of the picks projected to go for every team in the top 10: 1. BUF - Power 2. SEA - Beniers 3. ANA - Eklund 4. NJD - Clarke 5. CBJ - Hughes 6. DET - Wallstedt 7. SJ - Guenther 8. LA - Johnson 9. VAN - McTavish 10. OTT - Lucius Besides RHD, C is our biggest area of need. Sutter is a FA, Beagle is aging, and guys like Graovac, Michaelis, etc are just depth pieces at best. I feel Miller is better suited on the W even though he is a solid faceoff man and he’s a solid fit on the Lotto line. McTavish is my pick. If he’s still available at our pick, we run to the podium. He’s going to be a fantastic player. He’s scored at every level he’s played at and plays a very solid, sound game. I say he’s a year or two away from playing in the NHL but we can afford to give him the time like what we did with Podz. Hope we pick him up and looking forward to the draft 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now