Popular Post Zoolander Posted May 20, 2021 Popular Post Share Posted May 20, 2021 (edited) I encourage everyone to watch this interview (near the end of the video) so you can see why Mason Mactavish is my go-to guy at 9th overall. This is a side-by-side interview with Brandt Clarke and you can just see the difference in maturity between Mactavish and Clarke - the latter seems a bit immature... or maybe it's just that Mason Mactavish is so mature for his age. Mactavish is HUGE, he captained Team Canada at the U-18's in Shane Wright's absence, and he put up 1st line numbers in the Swiss league - which is quite a good league, respectively. He has a high floor and high ceiling, and IMHO I feel he could step in very quickly and stabilize our 3C position for years to come. Edited May 20, 2021 by Zoolander 2 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted May 20, 2021 Share Posted May 20, 2021 On 5/13/2021 at 12:29 AM, VancouverHabitant said: Hate to say it but LA will get smoked by Colorado again. Our team is over their covid funk and I can see them winning 2 out of their 5 games remaining. That would make us leapfrog both LA and San Jose unfortunately. That would give us the 9th overall pick. 9th overall guys, stop daydreaming of getting the 5th overall, it ain't happening and I do hope that I'm wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kuzy Posted May 20, 2021 Share Posted May 20, 2021 If by some miracle we happen to land the #1 or #2 pick, I would want the Canucks to take a long hard look at William Eklund. A bit undersized but he plays the game reminiscent of Stutzle - at least to me. I believe he has one of the highest ceilings, if not the highest ceiling of the entire draft. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted May 20, 2021 Share Posted May 20, 2021 3 minutes ago, Stech said: If by some miracle we happen to land the #1 or #2 pick, I would want the Canucks to take a long hard look at William Eklund. A bit undersized but he plays the game reminiscent of Stutzle - at least to me. I believe he has one of the highest ceilings, if not the highest ceiling of the entire draft. If are lucky enough to win the lottery (draft 1 or 2) we will select either Power or Clarke. Any other guy would be a reach, except (maybe?) Hughes at two. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kuzy Posted May 20, 2021 Share Posted May 20, 2021 4 minutes ago, Alflives said: If are lucky enough to win the lottery (draft 1 or 2) we will select either Power or Clarke. Any other guy would be a reach, except (maybe?) Hughes at two. I'd be fine with Clarke, Power scares me though, I've heard reports his decision making and IQ is questionable. Canucks need more high tempo, high hockey IQ play drivers! 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted May 20, 2021 Share Posted May 20, 2021 Just now, Stech said: I'd be fine with Clarke, Power scares me though, I've heard reports his decision making and IQ is questionable. Canucks need more high tempo, high hockey IQ play drivers! Excellent point. A player can have all the physical gifts, but if they’re a dumb hockey play then no thanks. Im confident we will be getting a guy with good skills and smart too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustABandwagoner Posted May 20, 2021 Share Posted May 20, 2021 19 minutes ago, Alflives said: A player can have all the physical gifts, but if they’re a dumb hockey play then no thanks Reminds you of Virtanen huh... I think benning or weisbrod said "hes big and strong and can protect the puck and can shoot well" LMAO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TGokou Posted May 20, 2021 Share Posted May 20, 2021 1 hour ago, Zoolander said: I encourage everyone to watch this interview (near the end of the video) so you can see why Mason Mactavish is my go-to guy at 9th overall. This is a side-by-side interview with Brandt Clarke and you can just see the difference in maturity between Mactavish and Clarke - the latter seems a bit immature... or maybe it's just that Mason Mactavish is so mature for his age. Mactavish is HUGE, he captained Team Canada at the U-18's in Shane Wright's absence, and he put up 1st line numbers in the Swiss league - which is quite a good league, respectively. He has a high floor and high ceiling, and IMHO I feel he could step in very quickly and stabilize our 3C position for years to come. I'm not gonna let my hopes up that we select 1st or 2nd and assume we draft 9th. I am also loving McTavish at this pick for the same reasons you give. There was a scouting report that he may be better suited to wing which I don't have a problem with although I'd still prefer him as third line center. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeNiro Posted May 20, 2021 Share Posted May 20, 2021 No to Mactavish there will be better players available. That screams of a Hayton like off the board pick. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bertuzzipunch Posted May 20, 2021 Share Posted May 20, 2021 2 hours ago, Zoolander said: I encourage everyone to watch this interview (near the end of the video) so you can see why Mason Mactavish is my go-to guy at 9th overall. This is a side-by-side interview with Brandt Clarke and you can just see the difference in maturity between Mactavish and Clarke - the latter seems a bit immature... or maybe it's just that Mason Mactavish is so mature for his age. Mactavish is HUGE, he captained Team Canada at the U-18's in Shane Wright's absence, and he put up 1st line numbers in the Swiss league - which is quite a good league, respectively. He has a high floor and high ceiling, and IMHO I feel he could step in very quickly and stabilize our 3C position for years to come. Yeah well spoken and looks like he kicks ass! No problem if we take him at 9 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flickyoursedin Posted May 20, 2021 Share Posted May 20, 2021 21 minutes ago, DeNiro said: No to Mactavish there will be better players available. That screams of a Hayton like off the board pick. Yeah I agree. While it isn’t the same type of reach as Hayton because Mason McTavish is worthy of a pick around the area of our pick. However if Johnson or Eklund are there I wouldn’t like the McTavish pick. We could essentially be picking a Nazim Kadri type player over a Zetterberg or Marner type of skill guy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MeanSeanBean Posted May 20, 2021 Share Posted May 20, 2021 (edited) 10 hours ago, Bure_Pavel said: Yeah I am but Zegras going 9th kinda stung, more refering to Hodgson and Boudron. 9th just seems like a way better number. Zegras was my guy or the draft. I was so bummed when he went right ahead of us. That feeling immediately turned because I realized Pod was still on the board. I had him in the top 5 and didn't really notice he slipped. Went from devastation to immediate joy. Edited May 20, 2021 by shayster007 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BPA Posted May 20, 2021 Share Posted May 20, 2021 3 hours ago, VancouverHabitant said: Quick. I need the Lotto Max numbers for this Friday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MeanSeanBean Posted May 20, 2021 Share Posted May 20, 2021 (edited) 43 minutes ago, shayster007 said: Oops Edited May 20, 2021 by shayster007 Messed up quote 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stawns Posted May 20, 2021 Share Posted May 20, 2021 at #9, do they take a chance on Svechcov to play with Podz? He might be one of the best 200 ft fwds in the draft Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stawns Posted May 20, 2021 Share Posted May 20, 2021 3 hours ago, Stech said: If by some miracle we happen to land the #1 or #2 pick, I would want the Canucks to take a long hard look at William Eklund. A bit undersized but he plays the game reminiscent of Stutzle - at least to me. I believe he has one of the highest ceilings, if not the highest ceiling of the entire draft. No argument here 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeNiro Posted May 20, 2021 Share Posted May 20, 2021 Think we need to take the best playmaker if we go with a forward. We have a lot of forwards that can shoot and cycle the boards, we don’t have enough guys that can make plays though. 1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stawns Posted May 20, 2021 Share Posted May 20, 2021 22 minutes ago, DeNiro said: Think we need to take the best playmaker if we go with a forward. We have a lot of forwards that can shoot and cycle the boards, we don’t have enough guys that can make plays though. That's probably Eklund 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bertuzzipunch Posted May 20, 2021 Share Posted May 20, 2021 24 minutes ago, DeNiro said: Think we need to take the best playmaker if we go with a forward. We have a lot of forwards that can shoot and cycle the boards, we don’t have enough guys that can make plays though. Yeah our scouts really need to nail this pick because theres so many good players to choose from. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AV's Coin Posted May 20, 2021 Share Posted May 20, 2021 (edited) I m onboard with MacTavish after watching some of the U18's Edited May 20, 2021 by AV's Coin 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now