Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

Coronavirus outbreak


Recommended Posts

Don’t know if already posted, but anyone who’s lost their income due to COVID-19 can apply to BC Hydro to have the next three months of bills waived and IIRC can defer another three months. Just need to go onto your account and apply. Need to show proof, like CERB deposit on bank statement, etc.

 

https://app.bchydro.com/accounts-billing/bill-payment/ways-to-pay/covid-19-relief-fund.html

 

EDIT: It’s actually a credit based on your average bill. Three months worth of hydro gets credited to your account.

Edited by SID.IS.SID.ME.IS.ME
  • Hydration 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
38 minutes ago, NewbieCanuckFan said:

Been a long time since I had frozen pizza but I SEEM to recall it tasting like toilet paper.:lol:

Frozen pizzas have improved tremendously, days of eating tombstone and red Barron are long gone.

  • Thanks 1
  • Hydration 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, RonMexico said:

 

They should do more testing though. More positive cases identified actually has a positive affect on the mortality rate which is important in determining steps to the re-mobilization of services. But maybe they're happy to leave it as is.

All you need to do is look at Dr Henry;s credentials to see this woman knows what she is doing - she might just be the most qualified CMOH in all the provinces and I trust her judgement. Each province has a different approach to how they are testing and each has it merits but from what i have seen we are slowly - remember the goal is to not overwhelm our health facilities and so far so good

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
44 minutes ago, Jester13 said:

I had a feeling you'd only find the Okanagan article for BC (remember, we're not the US, or Ontario where they're fining people, or Quebec, BC is a different situation). The article is a recommendation, i.e. if it's possible, and it also asks readers to keep in mind the following when thinking about calling people out: “That’s part of the reason to be kind and considerate of others,” he said. “The circumstances of others are not our circumstances.” 

 

The problem I have with calling people out is that we could probably find hypocrisy in every single person and say, "It's better if you did this, or that, or that." For example, don't buy frozen pizza, make your own because it's healthier for you and will last longer; or, don't go to the grocery store once a week because the incubation period is two weeks, so the more you go the more you endanger yourself and others, so instead go every two weeks or more; or, don't go to Costco to only buy a pair of shoes, instead put your foot up and ice it and then go get shoes when it's time to stock up on groceries, etc. etc.

 

Everyone can be better, but the vigilantism will only creat animosity and distrust in our communities and could very well have the opposite effect of what the calling out was trying to achieve in the first place. 

I think the approach in BC has been to establish the rules and recommendations but not to be too heavy handed in enforcement.  Maybe they've got more buy in because of this.  

  • Hydration 2
  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
39 minutes ago, Crabcakes said:

This confession implies that you know what toilet paper tastes like.  Nuff said :wacko:

Better than the flip side of that and knowing what wiping your butt with frozen pizza feels like.

  • Hydration 1
  • Haha 2
  • Sedinery 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, coho8888 said:

I think the approach in BC has been to establish the rules and recommendations but not to be too heavy handed in enforcement.  Maybe they've got more buy in because of this.  

Perhaps you’re right.

 

In the East, it’s intense. The New York border is a couple of hours away from Southern Ontario and Southern Quebec. 
 

Ontario and Quebec are shut down with quite the fines. 

 

Many people don’t mind telling people that they’re not abiding. 
 

It may sound alarmist to the West Coast but here it’s daily life.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Ryan Strome said:

Apparently Texas is opening up next week.

I have a sis in law in San Antonio and they are buckling down.  Their infection rate is increasing rapidly.

  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, coho8888 said:

I think the approach in BC has been to establish the rules and recommendations but not to be too heavy handed in enforcement.  Maybe they've got more buy in because of this.  

Delivery is important for sure, whether from our governments or from each other. 

  • Hydration 1
  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Jester13 said:

I had a feeling you'd only find the Okanagan article for BC (remember, we're not the US, or Ontario where they're fining people, or Quebec, BC is a different situation). The article is a recommendation, i.e. if it's possible, and it also asks readers to keep in mind the following when thinking about calling people out: “That’s part of the reason to be kind and considerate of others,” he said. “The circumstances of others are not our circumstances.” 

 

The problem I have with calling people out is that we could probably find hypocrisy in every single person and say, "It's better if you did this, or that, or that." For example, don't buy frozen pizza, make your own because it's healthier for you and will last longer; or, don't go to the grocery store once a week because the incubation period is two weeks, so the more you go the more you endanger yourself and others, so instead go every two weeks or more; or, don't go to Costco to only buy a pair of shoes, instead put your foot up and ice it and then go get shoes when it's time to stock up on groceries, etc. etc.

 

Everyone can be better, but the vigilantism will only creat animosity and distrust in our communities and could very well have the opposite effect of what the calling out was trying to achieve in the first place. 

I don't really have a strong opinion but its a recommendation that makes some sense to me. The grocery store is the one place that no one can avoid. That also makes it the one place where we are most likely to get infected. I no longer venture into the cookies/candy aisle at my local store. Because it is generally crowded and I have always seen way too many idiots dialing home to ask which brand of chocolate to buy. The store unfortunately isn't built to facilitate social distancing. A few too many people (along with their carts) suddenly enter an aisle and it makes it an adventure trying to get out, especially seeing the anxiety that people get when you are trying to navigate your way through. I haven't gotten my hands on a mask, which I imagine might make me look like a risk to people. The panic is real and you are unfortunately going to meet some anxious people who are likely going to be looking at you judgmentally. I have never been this hyper conscious of what I am doing in my life probably since high school, just my mere presence can cause anxiety in others. It was the other way around in high school. :blush:

 

Its unfortunate but we will all have to change how we have done things in the past. We have no choice but to adapt with the times. There is no real benefit trying to desperately cling to past habits and behaviours. But really its just about being smart, whether you are shopping alone or with someone. I liked Jimmy's idea of dividing up the list, its more efficient, and it also avoids situations where couples enter crowded areas of stores together, which is probably the only real complaint that I have.  

Edited by Toews
  • Hydration 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

They really need to let Dr Birx do their press conferences and keep that lunatic out of the public eye for while.  When I listen to her interviews, she's smart, she listens to and answers questions thoughtfully and I actually get a sense they have a plan.

 

What's going to mess the whole plan up is the lunatic whipping up a frenzy amongst his crazy followers.  For any opening to work, they have to have full buy in by citizens and I don't see his cult members willingly tested on a reg basis etc.

Edited by stawns
  • Hydration 4
Link to post
Share on other sites
56 minutes ago, coho8888 said:

I think the approach in BC has been to establish the rules and recommendations but not to be too heavy handed in enforcement.  Maybe they've got more buy in because of this.  

This is a key point in how our leadership has been responding to the pandemic and I agree completely coho, it is why in my view we've had more buy-in because of it - you just need to look to the south of us to see the backlash starting to escalate.  There are a few pockets in a couple states right now (Ohio, Michigan, Minnesota, ect....) that have held public pro-trump rallies that are against any rules/measures but who are we kidding - this will continue to escalate as long as their rules/measures stay in place.  These people are looking at it from the point of view that not following the social distancing/established measures is actually exercising their 'liberty' - not saving their loved ones lives.  I wouldn't even know where to begin a discussion with someone who held that point of view......but I'm sure some of you would know where to begin:). 

 

https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/us-trump-supporters-coronavirus-1.5535585

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Jester13 said:

I had a feeling you'd only find the Okanagan article for BC (remember, we're not the US, or Ontario where they're fining people, or Quebec, BC is a different situation). The article is a recommendation, i.e. if it's possible, and it also asks readers to keep in mind the following when thinking about calling people out: “That’s part of the reason to be kind and considerate of others,” he said. “The circumstances of others are not our circumstances.” 

 

The problem I have with calling people out is that we could probably find hypocrisy in every single person and say, "It's better if you did this, or that, or that." For example, don't buy frozen pizza, make your own because it's healthier for you and will last longer; or, don't go to the grocery store once a week because the incubation period is two weeks, so the more you go the more you endanger yourself and others, so instead go every two weeks or more; or, don't go to Costco to only buy a pair of shoes, instead put your foot up and ice it and then go get shoes when it's time to stock up on groceries, etc. etc.

 

Everyone can be better, but the vigilantism will only creat animosity and distrust in our communities and could very well have the opposite effect of what the calling out was trying to achieve in the first place. 

and there is an underlying sense as well

from the people who preach too hard

that they believe that there is a need to completely stop the virus spread

but that is not possible and was not the plan

the idea was and is to flatten the curve

so some details of behavioural standards

can vary from place to place depending how flat their curve is

 

  • Hydration 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, stawns said:

They really need to let Dr Birx do their press conferences and keep that lunatic out of the public eye for while.  When I listen to her interviews, she's smart, she listens to and answers questions thoughtfully and I actually get a sense they have a plan.

 

What's going to mess the whole plan up is the lunatic whipping up a frenzy amongst his crazy followers.  For any opening to work, they have to have full buy in by citizens and I don't see his cult members willingly tested on a reg basis etc.

Why don't they quarantine major cities like Vancouver?

 

It seems to me they should because the small provinces haven't been hit so bad. They lack major thoroughfare. Also stop it from building a stronger form like in Netherlands. 

Edited by Gawdzukes
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

6 hours ago, Me_ said:

Talking about the small percentage of the people who are obviously not caring.

 

People have needs. Absolutely. And 90%-99% are with the program.

 

But the ones who are flouting rules because the rules are inconvenient, are also the one who usually don’t give two s**ts about anything else.

 

Those are the ones to be called out just like people would call out a man beating his wife in public or a kid getting bullied. 
 

Their rights stop where others’ start.
 

And if the rule is 1 person at a time, perhaps there ought to be exceptions with papers that do say that assistance is a need; like a right to park in a handicap zone.

 

Are you that desperate to sell something?

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

So this is how my self isolation is going :P

 

Theres a clip in there that should remind you of a recent Canucks goal that you all should remember. If I noticed before I uploaded the video I would have added the actual goal to the video

 

 

Edited by Brock Botanen
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • -SN- locked and unlocked this topic
  • -SN- featured and pinned this topic
  • -SN- unfeatured this topic

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...