Popular Post -Vintage Canuck- 95,110 Posted January 3 Popular Post Share Posted January 3 15 2 9 1 3 Link to post Share on other sites
Popular Post Coconuts 13,299 Posted January 3 Popular Post Share Posted January 3 3 1 9 1 1 Link to post Share on other sites
Where's Wellwood 4,709 Posted January 3 Share Posted January 3 Would Hamonic or Vatanen be a better PTO/cheap contract for the 3rd pairing? Link to post Share on other sites
Wilbur 5,627 Posted January 3 Share Posted January 3 2 minutes ago, Where's Wellwood said: Would Hamonic or Vatanen be a better PTO/cheap contract for the 3rd pairing? Off the top of my head, I would assume Hamonic as he seems to be the better penalty killer and the Canucks could use that. 2 1 Link to post Share on other sites
Brad Marchand 7,904 Posted January 3 Share Posted January 3 Probably waiting for Ferland to be placed on LTIR before they can formally sign a contract. 1 2 Link to post Share on other sites
Popular Post Devron44 6,819 Posted January 3 Popular Post Share Posted January 3 I’d be cool with this. That leaves one rookie in the line up in my mind Joulevi and Benn as a 7th. Other rookies fill out the rest when injuries. That’s enough for us to see what we got without throwing them in the fire. Let’s see how camp goes though 10 Link to post Share on other sites
TNucks1 6,323 Posted January 3 Share Posted January 3 7 minutes ago, Where's Wellwood said: Would Hamonic or Vatanen be a better PTO/cheap contract for the 3rd pairing? ill take either, but by this it seems its gunna be hamonic, stoked if what were doing like the blues with hoffman Link to post Share on other sites
Popular Post Smashian Kassian 12,563 Posted January 3 Popular Post Share Posted January 3 I like it. Hamonic fills Tanev's role stylistically. Tanev & Stecher ---> Schmidt & Hamonic Not so bad after all. 11 3 9 3 1 3 Link to post Share on other sites
Popular Post luckylager 27,380 Posted January 3 Popular Post Share Posted January 3 Nice. He'd be a good partner for OJ. 2 2 2 1 2 Link to post Share on other sites
ilduce39 8,767 Posted January 3 Share Posted January 3 Just now, Smashian Kassian said: I like it. Hamonic fills Tanev's role stylistically. Tanev & Stecher ---> Schmidt & Hamonic Not so bad after all. Yep. As we’ve kicked it around for awhile in the other threads.. this just makes a ton of sense and really smooths out the D for this season. I’m stoked about this if it happens. 1 2 Link to post Share on other sites
luckylager 27,380 Posted January 3 Share Posted January 3 If Hamonic is playing with Schmidt, we end up with Myers OJ. Not sure I love a OJ Myers pairing. Link to post Share on other sites
HC20.0 2,461 Posted January 3 Share Posted January 3 My guess is that this is a Hoffman situation, and he will be signed the moment Ferland is put on the LTIR. Pretty excited to see Hamonic in a Canucks uniform! This fills a massive hole on our backend. 1 1 Link to post Share on other sites
theo5789 11,521 Posted January 3 Share Posted January 3 1 minute ago, luckylager said: If Hamonic is playing with Schmidt, we end up with Myers OJ. Not sure I love a OJ Myers pairing. Most likely we see Hamonic with OJ (or Rathbone). 1 Link to post Share on other sites
Popular Post theo5789 11,521 Posted January 3 Popular Post Share Posted January 3 Just now, HC20.0 said: My guess is that this is a Hoffman situation, and he will be signed the moment Ferland is put on the LTIR. Pretty excited to see Hamonic in a Canucks uniform! This fills a massive hole on our backend. 1 15 Link to post Share on other sites
Popular Post luckylager 27,380 Posted January 3 Popular Post Share Posted January 3 Just now, HC20.0 said: My guess is that this is a Hoffman situation, and he will be signed the moment Ferland is put on the LTIR. Pretty excited to see Hamonic in a Canucks uniform! This fills a massive hole on our backend. 1 17 1 Link to post Share on other sites
Popular Post DeNiro 36,031 Posted January 3 Popular Post Share Posted January 3 1 minute ago, luckylager said: If Hamonic is playing with Schmidt, we end up with Myers OJ. Not sure I love a OJ Myers pairing. I don’t think it would be Hamonic and Schmidt. I think they would plug him in Tanevs spot. But Juolevi and Myers could definitely be playing together. Edler Schmidt Hughes Hamonic Juolevi Myers Or Edler Schmidt Hughes Myers Juolevi Hamonic Or Edler Hamonic Hughes Schmidt Juolvei Myers 2 7 1 Link to post Share on other sites
luckylager 27,380 Posted January 3 Share Posted January 3 (edited) 5 minutes ago, theo5789 said: Most likely we see Hamonic with OJ (or Rathbone). That's what I was thinking, but if you see above my post, some guys are thinking Schmidt Hamonic. It would be a fine pairing for sure, but .. meh whatever. The pairings will sort themselves out actually. I don't care Edited January 3 by luckylager Link to post Share on other sites
King Heffy 29,497 Posted January 3 Share Posted January 3 Please be true. 2 Link to post Share on other sites
luckylager 27,380 Posted January 3 Share Posted January 3 1 minute ago, DeNiro said: I don’t think it would be Hamonic and Schmidt. I think they would plug him in Tanevs spot. But Juolevi and Myers could definitely be playing together. Edler Schmidt Hughes Hamonic Juolevi Myers Or Edler Schmidt Hughes Myers Juolevi Hamonic Or Edler Hamonic Hughes Schmidt Juolvei Myers You never had Edler Hughes Schmidt Myers Joulevi Hamonic 2 1 Link to post Share on other sites
ilduce39 8,767 Posted January 3 Share Posted January 3 (edited) 3 minutes ago, DeNiro said: I don’t think it would be Hamonic and Schmidt. I think they would plug him in Tanevs spot. But Juolevi and Myers could definitely be playing together. Edler Schmidt Hughes Hamonic Juolevi Myers Or Edler Schmidt Hughes Myers Juolevi Hamonic Or Edler Hamonic Hughes Schmidt Juolvei Myers It opens up the options for sure.. Schmidt could even flip to his natural left side if Rafferty or Chatfield outplay Olli and Rathbone (not that I expect that to happen). Should be fun to watch how it shakes down in camp. Edited January 3 by ilduce39 1 1 Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts