Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

Miller is back!!! Whoohooo!

Rate this topic


Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, Arrow 1983 said:

you do realize that defense pairings don't always play with the same forward lines usually only on the PP and PK

I realize that.  I matched my defensive pairings with the forward lines for illustrative purposes only.

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Arrow 1983 said:

Be careful people

3 hours ago, Arrow 1983 said:

it means it is possible that he could be but at the same time be careful cause it could mean he isn't

 

CONFUCIUS SAYMAN WHORUN BEHIND CAR GETEXHAUSTED! MAN WHO RUNIN FRONT OF CAR  GETTIRED!! Meme Creator - Funny Confucius Sayman Who Run Behind Car Get |  Funny Meme on ME.ME

Edited by oldnews
  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Great news, not having a fit for Petey and Boeser hurt us the past two games. We're a more dangerous team with him in the lineup. 

Edited by Coconuts
  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, janisahockeynut said:

Guys

We did not loose the game at even strength or PP

We lost the game on the PK

That is what we have to fix....and quickly!

Our PK let us down, absolutely, but going 0/4 and squandering multiple chances to tie things up or claw our way back in hurt us last game as well and that's where Miller helps. We're 0/11 on the powerplay thus far this season, not being able to capitalize on those chances to acquire, build on, or try and erase a lead shouldn't be understated.  

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Hydration 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Coconuts said:

Our PK let us down, absolutely, but going 0/4 and squandering multiple chances to tie things up or claw our way back in hurt us last game as well and that's where Miller helps. We're 0/11 on the powerplay thus far this season, not being able to capitalize on those chances to acquire, build on, or try and erase a lead shouldn't be understated.  

 

 

Your preaching to the choir 

  • Hydration 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, janisahockeynut said:

Your preaching to the choir 

I def agree though, our PK needs to be sharper if we're going to win games

 

I don't fault Holtby though, he was solid against Calgary 

  • Hydration 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I was watching the Wash/Pitts game today and was focusing on the PP

 

What I noticed and really have noticed for a year or so, is that our PP is much more static, other than Hughes

 

Petie does not skate with the puck behind the net and circle in front, with the others rotating as he does it

 

He and Bowser are both very still in comparison

Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, Alain Vigneault said:

Miller will help the PP and help get Petey/Brock going.

 

He can't fix the bottom six though.  Those guys are hopeless.

I don’t get the obsession with Beagle and Sutter. Yes they may kill penalties but shouldn’t they start developing young guys to take over who also are a threat offensively like a Lockwood. He has speed. Maybe try McEwen. It just seems the Sutters and Beagles are on the ice for a lot of goals or getting penalties because they are so slow. We need a few speedsters on those lines. We have a lot of players that do the same things on those lines.

Edited by Canuckfanforlife82
Link to post
Share on other sites
33 minutes ago, Canuckfanforlife82 said:

I don’t get the obsession with Beagle and Sutter. Yes they may kill penalties but shouldn’t they start developing young guys to take over who also are a threat offensively like a Lockwood. He has speed. Maybe try McEwen. It just seems the Sutters and Beagles are on the ice for a lot of goals or getting penalties because they are so slow. We need a few speedsters on those lines. We have a lot of players that do the same things on those lines.

I don’t think Beagle and Sutter have even taken a penalty thus far... oddly enough it’s been our quicker players who have taken several penalties

Link to post
Share on other sites
18 hours ago, Arrow 1983 said:

it means it is possible that he could be but at the same time be careful cause it could mean he isn't

But what is the point of commenting something that covers all the possibilities that could possibly happen? Lemme try.

 

Be careful people, Canucks might lose tonight but also they might play well and scores lots of goals so maybe they won't lose tonight. 

 

Yeah I dunno... not really the most insightful of commentary 

Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, Alain Vigneault said:

Miller will help the PP and help get Petey/Brock going.

 

He can't fix the bottom six though.  Those guys are hopeless.

what a horrible take - completely oblivious noob material.

 

the username is completely unfitting.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...