TNucks1 Posted March 24, 2021 Share Posted March 24, 2021 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Canuck Posted March 24, 2021 Share Posted March 24, 2021 2 hours ago, theo5789 said: The second paragraph, “...or his intention,...” He shared his intention with a fellow ref, who did nothing. Thereby, a possible accomplice to said intention. Would Kelly Sutherland not be held to the same scrutiny as Peel then? If Colin Campbell wants to “ensure the integrity of the game”, Sutherland at the very least should be investigated (and in my opinion fired) for not bringing this forward. On a side note, say Sutherland did do something, and reported this to the game officials. Has a ref ever been ejected? I wonder if the NHL has protocols in place for such a situation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brownky Posted March 24, 2021 Share Posted March 24, 2021 6 minutes ago, Darth Canuck said: The second paragraph, “...or his intention,...” He shared his intention with a fellow ref, who did nothing. Thereby, a possible accomplice to said intention. Would Kelly Sutherland not be held to the same scrutiny as Peel then? If Colin Campbell wants to “ensure the integrity of the game”, Sutherland at the very least should be investigated (and in my opinion fired) for not bringing this forward. On a side note, say Sutherland did do something, and reported this to the game officials. Has a ref ever been ejected? I wonder if the NHL has protocols in place for such a situation. That's how you know it's a hush job to sweep it as fast as possible. Sutherland was entirely complicit and is not being mentioned at all. It needs to blow up. Big. It's actual match fixing - anybody who manages gambling or whatnot should be asking a lot of difficult questions and the NHL should not be able to hide behind that shield and push Peel out as fodder. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spur1 Posted March 24, 2021 Share Posted March 24, 2021 Just another example of what I have been saying since the 90s. The NHL is crooked. I have seen time and time again where a team is dominating and up a couple of goals only to see a “game management” call. The losing team scores on the power play and the momentum completely changes resulting in the losing team coming back and winning. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhillipBlunt Posted March 24, 2021 Share Posted March 24, 2021 Good riddance, Tim Peel. Now to deal with the system that enables these turds. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maniwaki Canuck Posted March 24, 2021 Share Posted March 24, 2021 25 minutes ago, KoreanHockeyFan said: At the very least, I hope journalists like Friedman and LeBrun ask the league some hard questions around this. They won't. "Insiders" = access journalism. Their "sources" would dry up. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smashian Kassian Posted March 24, 2021 Share Posted March 24, 2021 Disgraceful by the league, just passing the buck. It's not Peel alone everyone who watches the games has known this was going on for years. It's been extremely clear this season across the league. Making a veteran official like Peel the sacrificial goat is shameful. 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Master Mind Posted March 24, 2021 Popular Post Share Posted March 24, 2021 If you've worked with an official at any hockey level, there's a good chance you've heard this kind of talk before. This isn't new, it's ingrained in hockey culture at the earliest of stages. Almost everyone is well aware it takes a more egregious penalty to get a call in overtime for example. Poor response by the league imo. Regardless of Peel's officiating, throwing him under the bus when every other ref has a similar mindset is a cowardly move. 2 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Mossberg Posted March 24, 2021 Popular Post Share Posted March 24, 2021 Cant wait to see what Ron Maclean says about this? Apparently this could never happen 3 6 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4petesake Posted March 24, 2021 Share Posted March 24, 2021 15 minutes ago, PhillipBlunt said: Good riddance, Tim Peel. Now to deal with the system that enables these turds. This firing narrowly beats out my previous favourite Tim Peel moment. Bortuzzo’s goal with an assist to Peel’s nuts 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gurn Posted March 24, 2021 Share Posted March 24, 2021 I admit, I just got up and am not at my best; however what's the big deal? All I've heard is a guy saying he wanted to give a penalty earlier. While he wanted to, the infractions were not quite at the level he requires to call a penalty, till the one he did call. Not suprising at all. Had he said I wanted to call a penalty earlier, but the league wouldn't like it; there would be a story here, imo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-SN- Posted March 24, 2021 Share Posted March 24, 2021 This was the penalty call btw: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wolfgang Durst Posted March 24, 2021 Share Posted March 24, 2021 1 hour ago, Wolfgang Durst said: It was, but it shouldn't be part of their jobs. Their job is soley to enforce the rules. Period. Ray Ferraro: “1) I find it interesting the outrage of many about Tim Peel and his comment. Many subscribe to “refs get in the way, shouldn’t call so many penalties or they let too many go”…those ideas quickly lead to make up calls. My thought is to simplify it all. Call the rule book. Ha, Ha. sounds like I have Ray on my side. ! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wolfgang Durst Posted March 24, 2021 Share Posted March 24, 2021 3 minutes ago, SNuck said: This was the penalty call btw: Such a dive. Never a penalty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
250Integra Posted March 24, 2021 Share Posted March 24, 2021 Whoopie doo.. so he was supposed to retire next month anyways.. The league just carries on. Corruptness will continue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theo5789 Posted March 24, 2021 Share Posted March 24, 2021 32 minutes ago, 4petesake said: This firing narrowly beats out my previous favourite Tim Peel moment. Bortuzzo’s goal with an assist to Peel’s nuts So was this goal disallowed as the title of the video suggests? Is there a rule that a goal cannot be scored if it's off a ref? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tre Mac Posted March 24, 2021 Share Posted March 24, 2021 Well f#$% the game on tonight, I got better things to waste my time on surprisingly. If the NHL continues to favor teams over the other then why bother watching? Anyone who says this isn't a big deal should either go back and watch the 2011 SCF or re-read what have wrote on here after. We were all outraged at the officiating. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gurn Posted March 24, 2021 Share Posted March 24, 2021 2 minutes ago, Tre Mac said: If the NHL continues to favor teams over the other How do you get "favouritism" out of the Pool incident? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Heffy Posted March 24, 2021 Share Posted March 24, 2021 3 minutes ago, gurn said: How do you get "favouritism" out of the Pool incident? How do you still think the refs are honest after the Peel incident? 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KirkSave Posted March 24, 2021 Share Posted March 24, 2021 It is simple. See a penalty, call it. But looking for a penalty to call is such BS. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now