VegasCanuck Posted April 8, 2021 Share Posted April 8, 2021 Just now, Devron44 said: Oh we are in excellent shape for the expansion draft. Something JB has done very well with. All the NTC that people complain about have no barring on the Expansion Draft. We are probably on the top of the list for being best positioned for the draft Give Seattle a Happy Birthday 3rd or 4th round pick in 2022 or 23 in exchange for taking Holtby, and sign another backup / depth guy in case DiPietro isn't ready to step into the backup position for next season. I like Holtby, and it was a good move bringing in someone experienced in handling pressure, just in case Demko needed some relief. He will provide a solid option for Seattle in goal and brings a lot of experience. Alternatively give them a Happy Birthday 4th or 5th and tell them to take Virtanen. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canuck Surfer Posted April 8, 2021 Share Posted April 8, 2021 2 minutes ago, NewbieCanuckFan said: Benning should be GM of the year if he manages to get LE and Holtby off the roster next season without giving up major draft picks. If I am not mistaken to buy out Loui? This off season we have to pay a $1 mill ''signing'' bonus. Then Eriksson has $3 mill in salary totalling $4 mill still owed. That can be bought out, albeit paying out paying 2/3rds the $3 mill salary. Net cost to buy out = $3 mill. 2021/22 cap hit $1 mill + $1.333 = $2.333 in liu of $6mil cap hit 2022/23 cap hit $1.33mill in liu of $0 Clearly Holtby will be exposed. Logically either he or Jake would be selected. Or Meyer who we could otherwise protect but for min games required not met other D. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
combover Posted April 8, 2021 Share Posted April 8, 2021 2 minutes ago, grandmaster said: Not during a flat cap Covid era. This contract is grossly overpaid. Terrible Whoa whoa. only a Benning apologist can use that argument to defend his stupidity. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewbieCanuckFan Posted April 8, 2021 Share Posted April 8, 2021 1 minute ago, Freeridebc said: If I could only somehow get seen by jb and Franky. I'd pocket 10mil! Or Jim Benning trying to tell Aquilini.....look, I just signed Holtby less than a year ago but I already want you to buy him out because he stinks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junkyard Dog Posted April 8, 2021 Share Posted April 8, 2021 (edited) If the COVID flat cap wasn’t a thing this would be a fair deal. Unfortunately it is a thing. There are bargain contracts that look better than this. It’s like 500k, or 1 year less, off from being a adequate deal. Edited April 8, 2021 by Junkyard Dog Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
204CanucksFan Posted April 8, 2021 Share Posted April 8, 2021 4 minutes ago, VegasCanuck said: There's still nothing there that is likely more attractive than Holtby and his experience. Its likely we make a deal on who they take. Yeah thats who I'm hoping we convince them to take 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
combover Posted April 8, 2021 Share Posted April 8, 2021 Just now, combover said: Whoa whoa. only a Benning apologist can use that excuse to defend his stupidity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grandmaster Posted April 8, 2021 Share Posted April 8, 2021 So the priority was to overpay and lock up this guy. Doing this was so urgent and necessary BEFORE Quinn and Petey. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zimmy Posted April 8, 2021 Share Posted April 8, 2021 3 minutes ago, iinatcc said: kind of like what we all said about Sutter or Beagle or Gudbransson yes, with, I'm confident to say, a slightly higher expected return. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J-Dizzle Posted April 8, 2021 Share Posted April 8, 2021 1 minute ago, Tom Sestito said: true those oiler guys mcdavid draisatl rly bad playre s sutter is better Uhhhhhhh......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Devron Posted April 8, 2021 Share Posted April 8, 2021 (edited) 3 minutes ago, combover said: Whoa whoa. only a Benning apologist can use that argument to defend his stupidity. Edit: Wrong post Edited April 8, 2021 by Devron44 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spur1 Posted April 8, 2021 Share Posted April 8, 2021 Wow...what a bunch of cheap critics in this thread. Pearson got a reasonable contract for what he brings to the team. Don’t forget that JB has a little extra to spend if the reports on Beagle being out long term are true. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post rekker Posted April 8, 2021 Popular Post Share Posted April 8, 2021 5 minutes ago, grandmaster said: Not during a flat cap Covid era. This contract is grossly overpaid. Terrible You realize the average NHL contract is 2.98 million right? 4 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ey40 Posted April 8, 2021 Share Posted April 8, 2021 This is what happen when there is no one in the organization would talk some sense (or cent, in this case) to Benning before he offers this kind of ridiculous contract. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewbieCanuckFan Posted April 8, 2021 Share Posted April 8, 2021 Just now, Canuck Surfer said: Clearly Holtby will be exposed. Logically either he or Jake would be selected. Or Meyer who we could otherwise protect but for min games required not met other D. Logically one can fairly easily sign a 30+ year old backup goalie to put up meh numbers at a fraction of the cash in today’s environment. Jake at least has upside. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Violator Posted April 8, 2021 Share Posted April 8, 2021 Pearson's NTC doesn't bother me it gives his family more stability in his career. This is a good signing in my opinion whish we had Toffoli but we have loui 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EternalCanuckFan Posted April 8, 2021 Share Posted April 8, 2021 Sigh, overall I like Pearson and he's decent in a depth role but just not a fan of the $3.25M cap hit. If Pearson can produce at least at a 30-40 point clip for each of the three seasons then I think it will be a fair deal. The good news about Pearson is that he's only turning 29 this year and is respectable two-way forward who can fill in a top-6 role if required. He'll be 31 at the end of this deal which is about right. The bad news about Pearson is that on the Canucks he has to fill a top-6 role. He's not terribly slow but he's also not particularly fleet of foot. If the Canucks really will not have Beagle for the rest of this year and next year, then I can see why they want to have Pearson around as the veteran in the room. Expiring UFAs this summer who are around the same age and size as Pearson are: Hyman, Saad, Dzingle and Janmark. I'm excluding Landeskog and Hall as they're outliers. Dzingle's probably the most comparable and had a $3.375M cap hit when he signed it a few years ago. Hyman is going to get a decent raise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VegasCanuck Posted April 8, 2021 Share Posted April 8, 2021 2 minutes ago, EP Phone Home said: As per Capfriendly they aren’t exempt. I will not try again after this discussion. Lind OJ and MacEwen are in fact needed for expansion protection. Seattle can pick any player who has two years or more of professional hockey they played in the AHL which is professional hockey. They need to be protected buddy. As per Capfriendly. I didn't want to re-post all the screenshots, but I stand corrected. I still believe that we will likely make them an offer of a draft pick in exchange for taking the player of our choice, or one of a small selection, same as many teams did with Seattle. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grandmaster Posted April 8, 2021 Share Posted April 8, 2021 1 minute ago, rekker said: You realize the average NHL contract is 2.98 million right? You realize that average was established BEFORE the Covid flat cap era right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aGENT Posted April 8, 2021 Share Posted April 8, 2021 16 minutes ago, Tom Sestito said: Are you implying that players generally peak outside of their prime? Players have a peak and a plateau (prime). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now