wallstreetamigo Posted May 13, 2021 Share Posted May 13, 2021 I could see him ending up in Edmonton. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wallstreetamigo Posted May 13, 2021 Share Posted May 13, 2021 If the Sabres were smart they would pull the old switcheroo with Seattle and get assets to leave Reinhart unprotected lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gawdzukes Posted May 13, 2021 Share Posted May 13, 2021 8 hours ago, Tortorella's Rant said: Could possibly have used Gaudette in such a trade but we gave him away for nothing. Haha, Gaudette and some cheese whiz for Reinhart. Give me a break. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BPA Posted May 13, 2021 Share Posted May 13, 2021 1 hour ago, TNucks1 said: man, gotta feel for buffalo lol, but if we can low ball them for him, they already did terrible trades in the past. EDIT: has sam been palying C or LW/RW for them? Primarily RW. Then (I think) C when Eichel went down. I believe he prefers C over RW. Canucks can try to low ball BUF but it still needs to be better than any other offer by other teams. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westcoastcanucks777 Posted May 13, 2021 Share Posted May 13, 2021 Cool trade for him and play him on D see if he plays D like his old man! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iinatcc Posted May 13, 2021 Share Posted May 13, 2021 Seems like he's trying to hint he wants to go Vegas. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wanless Posted May 13, 2021 Share Posted May 13, 2021 With the team having a solid core I would actually be ok with this 2021 first unprotected with conditions 2021 second 2022 first, if 2021 first is top 3 then it becomes 2023 second 2022 second Basically 2 firsts and 2 seconds or a top 3 and three seconds They take Eriksson to make cap work We get Reinhardt An offer sheet to get him would be in the 6.5 to 8 range and would cost a first, second and third, but we would need to unload cap and don't have a 2022 third. This could potentially set up forward group Hoglander - Petersson - Boeser Pearson - Horvat - Reinhardt Gadjovich - Miller - Podkolzin I know it's early to pencil Gadjovich in but having a heavy line like that would do wonders at wearing down the opposition and would be able to be sheltered with primarily neutral and ozone starts. I know giving up the picks is a lot, that roster would be in tact for another 4 years and with the d moving forward looking like Hughes - free agent Schmidt - Myers Rathbone - Hamonic Juolevi The team has a few years it could go without a first round pick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Heffy Posted May 13, 2021 Share Posted May 13, 2021 2 hours ago, VancouverHabitant said: Yeah Buffalo wouldn't be trading from a position of power at all. One thing that people shouldn't discount is that his 25 goals this year would've prorated to 37 goals in an 82 season. I can't remember the last time that a Canuck scored more then 30 in a season, maybe Daniel or Henrik 10 years ago? In any case I'm personally not in favour of this deal unless we are able to unload one more of our bottom 6 contracts. 2021 draft class doesn't excite me that much and getting a couple of lottery tickets in 2nd and 3rd rounds in exchange for our top 10 pick would be okay with me if they also take Roussel or Beagle. Power, Edvinsson, and Johnson all excite me plenty. We need defense and this draft is loaded with quality D, with an explosive talent in Johnson if we want to take a forward anyway. What's not to like? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TNucks1 Posted May 13, 2021 Share Posted May 13, 2021 2 hours ago, Westcoastcanucks777 said: Cool trade for him and play him on D see if he plays D like his old man! they got the cap? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iinatcc Posted May 13, 2021 Share Posted May 13, 2021 My guess is that Buffalo is going to ask for either Höglander or Boeser for Reinhart. I just don't feel it's worth it if it means giving those two, up at least Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bad_BOI_pete Posted May 13, 2021 Share Posted May 13, 2021 what are the odds seattle signs reinhart in thier 48hr window? sabres cannot match Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D-Money Posted May 13, 2021 Share Posted May 13, 2021 12 hours ago, rekker said: I'd trade Schmidt for Reinhardt if we could sign Larsson to replace him. Absolutely. Would probably take more than Schmidt, but I like that idea. Schmidt has a 10-team NTC. I promise you Buffalo is on it. And really, despite being a lefty, he’s our best RD, and by a sizeable margin. Unless he indicates he wants out, trading him would be a step backwards. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanucksCountry Posted May 13, 2021 Share Posted May 13, 2021 Call me Crazy here but i'd also do this years first if one of Hughes Power or Clarke aren't there, something like Rinehart and a 3rd to us for Lind 2021 1st Roussel Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iinatcc Posted May 13, 2021 Share Posted May 13, 2021 49 minutes ago, Petey_BOI said: what are the odds seattle signs reinhart in thier 48hr window? sabres cannot match Will Reinhart become an RFA? That's actually a good idea. If someone can go Aho likely Buffalo will not match due to their financial issues and why would you want to keep a player in the organization for 7 years if they don't want to be there? Giving up 1st, 2nd, and 3rd isn't exactly that bad especially if you know you are going to be a playoff team Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rekker Posted May 13, 2021 Share Posted May 13, 2021 2 hours ago, D-Money said: Schmidt has a 10-team NTC. I promise you Buffalo is on it. And really, despite being a lefty, he’s our best RD, and by a sizeable margin. Unless he indicates he wants out, trading him would be a step backwards. Ah, no way he would waive for Buffalo. Talk about a team that's going to have issues attracting players. Yikes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shiznak Posted May 13, 2021 Share Posted May 13, 2021 Barring getting the two top picks, I wouldn’t mind trading our first this year, if it meant Buffalo taking on both Loui’ and Roussel’s contracts. Probably have to add in Juolevi as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iinatcc Posted May 13, 2021 Share Posted May 13, 2021 (edited) 1 hour ago, shiznak said: Barring getting the two top picks, I wouldn’t mind trading our first this year, if it meant Buffalo taking on both Loui’ and Roussel’s contracts. Probably have to add in Juolevi as well. Hmmm I don't think Buffalo in any circumstances is taking Eriksson a and Roussel's contracts and Juolevi has no value. I think this year's 1st for Reinhart would only work if Canucks land a top 5 and possibly give up JT Miller (so replace Reinhart as a winger and center) and possibly a later round pick. Remember how much Ottawa gave up for Duchene I think Reinhart and Duchene are comparable assets Edited May 13, 2021 by iinatcc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted May 13, 2021 Share Posted May 13, 2021 26 minutes ago, iinatcc said: Hmmm I don't think Buffalo in any circumstances is taking Eriksson a and Roussel's contracts and Juolevi has no value. I think this year's 1st for Reinhart would only work if Canucks land a top 5 and possibly give up JT Miller (so replace Reinhart as a winger and center) and possibly a later round pick. Remember how much Ottawa gave up for Duchene I think Reinhart and Duchene are comparable assets Agree with most. But OJ has value, just not a lot right now. And zero chance Reinhardt returns what Duchene did. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iinatcc Posted May 13, 2021 Share Posted May 13, 2021 (edited) 10 minutes ago, Alflives said: Agree with most. But OJ has value, just not a lot right now. And zero chance Reinhardt returns what Duchene did. I think the value of OJ now is probably a small sweetener. Like when they add a salad or mashed potatoes the side of a meal. It's nice but it isn't going to be the reason why you ordered it from the menu. Edited May 13, 2021 by iinatcc 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Podz92 Posted May 13, 2021 Share Posted May 13, 2021 18 hours ago, shazzam said: Their plan is to rebuild the rebuild and then again Doing the rebuild Edmonton style... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now