EddieVedder Posted June 12, 2021 Share Posted June 12, 2021 On 6/10/2021 at 12:11 PM, oldnews said: You lost me at Hamonic and "long term" - those don't belong in the same sentence wadr - you do that and you can delete the rest of that thought - the 'short term issues' part. And regardless of whether Hamonic would sign long term for the song he took this year, he's not going to improve this team's top 4, period. So the whole Schmidt/Hamonic vs Tanev/Stecher thing is a non-starter for me - neither Hamonic or Stecher compute in that kind of 'temporal' outlook. Schmidt vs Tanev is the more relevent question - and it remains that there is work to do on the more primary need than Schmidt. Teams don't need to accomplish their most primary task first - but this one remains in play. Hamonics a legit top 4. Not sure what youre talking about. Hes the only reason Hughes wasnt a -60 this yr. The team needs more players like him if we are going to get anywhere. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now