HKSR Posted June 21, 2021 Share Posted June 21, 2021 To VAN: 6th Overall (1st Round) 48th Overall (2nd Round) To DET: 9th Overall (1st Round) 41st Overall (2nd Round) 2022 4th Round Pick Just some swapping of picks, but makes a difference... This trade hinges on discussions with SJ and LA that they are not selecting Wallstedt as he is Detroit's man. Vancouver moves up 3 spots in the 1st round, but drops 7 spots in the 2nd round while also giving up an additional 4th round pick in 2022. Detroit moves down 3 spots in the 1st round but still gets their elite goaltending prospect they desperately need, but move up 7 spots in the 2nd round and gain a 5th round pick. With that being said: 1 Buffalo - Owen Power - No doubt, the potential is there to become a franchise defenceman. 2 Seattle - Matthew Beniers - Way too much talent to pass up a player of this calibre at #2, not to mention the marketing of a star centre for the expansion team 3 Anaheim - Dylan Guenther - His stock has really jumped lately. True offensive gifts that Anaheim couldn't pass up here. 4 New Jersey - Luke Hughes - The connection to Jack Hughes is a marketing powerhouse in the making, not to mention he is an excellent defenceman. 5 Columbus - William Eklund - Eklund lands into Columbus' lap. There is no way the CBJ pass up on him here at #5. 6 Vancouver - Brandt Clarke - The whole reason why the Canucks made this deal. They land their blue chip top pairing RHD! 7 San Jose - Simon Edvinsson - Burns and Karlsson are aging out. Time to add a potential franchise defenceman to their pool 8 LA - Kent Johnson - So much skill, and possibly better suited for the wing. LA has lots of centres to work with in their prospect pool with Johnson on the wing. 9 Detroit - Jesper Wallstedt - Detroit gets their guy. 10 Ottawa - Mason McTavish - With a floor of a top tier 3C, and potential for at least 2C, McTavish and Tkachuk will be a pain in the ass to play against for years. 1 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Heffy Posted June 21, 2021 Share Posted June 21, 2021 I'd rather McTavish be our pain in the ass to play against, but then again I'm not particularly high on Clarke. 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VegasCanuck Posted June 21, 2021 Share Posted June 21, 2021 5 minutes ago, HKSR said: To VAN: 6th Overall (1st Round) 48th Overall (2nd Round) To DET: 9th Overall (1st Round) 41st Overall (2nd Round) 2022 4th Round Pick Just some swapping of picks, but makes a difference... This trade hinges on discussions with SJ and LA that they are not selecting Wallstedt as he is Detroit's man. Vancouver moves up 3 spots in the 1st round, but drops 7 spots in the 2nd round while also giving up an additional 4th round pick in 2022. Detroit moves down 3 spots in the 1st round but still gets their elite goaltending prospect they desperately need, but move up 7 spots in the 2nd round and gain a 5th round pick. With that being said: 1 Buffalo - Owen Power - No doubt, the potential is there to become a franchise defenceman. 2 Seattle - Matthew Beniers - Way too much talent to pass up a player of this calibre at #2, not to mention the marketing of a star centre for the expansion team 3 Anaheim - Dylan Guenther - His stock has really jumped lately. True offensive gifts that Anaheim couldn't pass up here. 4 New Jersey - Luke Hughes - The connection to Jack Hughes is a marketing powerhouse in the making, not to mention he is an excellent defenceman. 5 Columbus - William Eklund - Eklund lands into Columbus' lap. There is no way the CBJ pass up on him here at #5. 6 Vancouver - Brandt Clarke - The whole reason why the Canucks made this deal. They land their blue chip top pairing RHD! 7 San Jose - Simon Edvinsson - Burns and Karlsson are aging out. Time to add a potential franchise defenceman to their pool 8 LA - Kent Johnson - So much skill, and possibly better suited for the wing. LA has lots of centres to work with in their prospect pool with Johnson on the wing. 9 Detroit - Jesper Wallstedt - Detroit gets their guy. 10 Ottawa - Mason McTavish - With a floor of a top tier 3C, and potential for at least 2C, McTavish and Tkachuk will be a pain in the ass to play against for years. I think you'd have more success with that if it was: To Vancouver, 6th OA, 48th OA To Detroit, 9th OA, 41st OA, 2022 2nd or 3rd round pick 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post JM_ Posted June 21, 2021 Popular Post Share Posted June 21, 2021 its true, swapping can come with big ramifications. 4 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhillipBlunt Posted June 21, 2021 Share Posted June 21, 2021 13 minutes ago, Jimmy McGill said: its true, swapping can come with big ramifications. And ramming can come with big swapifications. 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nuxfanabroad Posted June 21, 2021 Share Posted June 21, 2021 Is all this a neighbourly thing ta do?! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JM_ Posted June 21, 2021 Share Posted June 21, 2021 1 minute ago, Nuxfanabroad said: Is all this a neighbourly thing ta do?! depends on the neighbour 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JM_ Posted June 21, 2021 Share Posted June 21, 2021 50 minutes ago, HKSR said: To VAN: 6th Overall (1st Round) 48th Overall (2nd Round) To DET: 9th Overall (1st Round) 41st Overall (2nd Round) 2022 4th Round Pick Just some swapping of picks, but makes a difference... This trade hinges on discussions with SJ and LA that they are not selecting Wallstedt as he is Detroit's man. Vancouver moves up 3 spots in the 1st round, but drops 7 spots in the 2nd round while also giving up an additional 4th round pick in 2022. Detroit moves down 3 spots in the 1st round but still gets their elite goaltending prospect they desperately need, but move up 7 spots in the 2nd round and gain a 5th round pick. With that being said: 1 Buffalo - Owen Power - No doubt, the potential is there to become a franchise defenceman. 2 Seattle - Matthew Beniers - Way too much talent to pass up a player of this calibre at #2, not to mention the marketing of a star centre for the expansion team 3 Anaheim - Dylan Guenther - His stock has really jumped lately. True offensive gifts that Anaheim couldn't pass up here. 4 New Jersey - Luke Hughes - The connection to Jack Hughes is a marketing powerhouse in the making, not to mention he is an excellent defenceman. 5 Columbus - William Eklund - Eklund lands into Columbus' lap. There is no way the CBJ pass up on him here at #5. 6 Vancouver - Brandt Clarke - The whole reason why the Canucks made this deal. They land their blue chip top pairing RHD! 7 San Jose - Simon Edvinsson - Burns and Karlsson are aging out. Time to add a potential franchise defenceman to their pool 8 LA - Kent Johnson - So much skill, and possibly better suited for the wing. LA has lots of centres to work with in their prospect pool with Johnson on the wing. 9 Detroit - Jesper Wallstedt - Detroit gets their guy. 10 Ottawa - Mason McTavish - With a floor of a top tier 3C, and potential for at least 2C, McTavish and Tkachuk will be a pain in the ass to play against for years. I like the idea of moving up, I don't think Detroit sends us any picks tho. I think they'd want at least a 2nd, and likely Lockwood to do it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IBatch Posted June 21, 2021 Share Posted June 21, 2021 Just want to say, if Clarke is our guy, we won't for sure get him at 6. The worst case for me at least, is doing this, missing out on Clarke and being stuck with Eklund. Feel we are fine staying where we are and taking either Johnson or McTavish. But Clarke would be a great add so see where your going with this. He could go as high as second. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coconuts Posted June 21, 2021 Share Posted June 21, 2021 (edited) +1 for the use of ramifications But I feel we'd have to give up more, probably a third instead of a fourth at least Edited June 21, 2021 by Coconuts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted June 21, 2021 Share Posted June 21, 2021 30 minutes ago, Jimmy McGill said: depends on the neighbour Hi neighbour! 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted June 21, 2021 Share Posted June 21, 2021 1 minute ago, IBatch said: Just want to say, if Clarke is our guy, we won't for sure get him at 6. The worst case for me at least, is doing this, missing out on Clarke and being stuck with Eklund. Feel we are fine staying where we are and taking either Johnson or McTavish. But Clarke would be a great add so see where your going with this. He could go as high as second. Can’t make the deal unless Clarke falls to six. But totally agree Clarke is gone well before. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IBatch Posted June 21, 2021 Share Posted June 21, 2021 (edited) 4 minutes ago, Alflives said: Can’t make the deal unless Clarke falls to six. But totally agree Clarke is gone well before. In this case it might work for us. Given Sieder is already in DET system and killing it doubt they take Clarke which might mean we have a chance for him. In that case would be understand us moving up for him. Edited June 21, 2021 by IBatch 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted June 21, 2021 Share Posted June 21, 2021 Just now, IBatch said: In this case it might work for us. Given Sieder us already in DET system and killing it doubt they take Clarke which might mean we have a chance for him. In that case would be understand us moving up for him. Yup. It’s a draft floor deal, that has to be prearranged if things fall a certain way. Detroit might just very well take Wallstadt at six anyway. Going from six to nine they might miss out on him. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IBatch Posted June 22, 2021 Share Posted June 22, 2021 1 hour ago, Alflives said: Yup. It’s a draft floor deal, that has to be prearranged if things fall a certain way. Detroit might just very well take Wallstadt at six anyway. Going from six to nine they might miss out on him. Yes i'm hoping we have two guys taken from the early teen consensus and somebody slips to us. This year the only guy i see maybe slipping is Eklund that's projected to go awhile before us. Going to need the scouts to do a pretty awesome job to pull a home run out of their hats this time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wai_lai416 Posted June 22, 2021 Share Posted June 22, 2021 i don't see detroit accepting the deal dropping 3 spots for literally a 4th round pick 48th to 41st is neligible since it's more of a spin the wheel try ur luck anyways outside of a handful of picks 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drakrami Posted June 22, 2021 Share Posted June 22, 2021 If you think about it. Quite possible Benning will use the #9 pick to upgrade the team and save his job instead of thinking about the future. Owner probably on board with this direction too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghostsof1915 Posted June 22, 2021 Share Posted June 22, 2021 4 hours ago, Jimmy McGill said: depends on the neighbour 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patel Bure Posted June 23, 2021 Share Posted June 23, 2021 Solid proposal but I’d rather just hang onto our pick. None of these players are “sure things” or “locks” and so I’m not really a fan of the idea of moving up. Canucks got a pretty good selection at the #9 spot in Bo Horvat back in 2013 and so I’d rather just take our chances at that spot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DelChristensen Posted June 30, 2021 Share Posted June 30, 2021 I agree keeping our 9th pick is a wise move unless some crazy GM loses his mind and makes us an offer we can't refuse as per Don Corleone!!! If you look at all the rankings from those so called experts you'll find a wide ranking system that some players are at the high end dropping lower and even out of the top ten! We'll get a quality player at 9 but might be a pick that will be at least a year or two away! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now