Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

Proposals (Van-Phil, Van-NYI, Van-Col, UFAs)


Recommended Posts

1. 
To Van - 3rd Rounder
To Phil- Nate Schmidt

Yes Nate Schmidt is good, yes this was a down year for him, but with Rathbone up and coming, that 6m is far better spent on a defensive specialist, and upgrade to our 3rd line. Plus, yet another rumour surfaced that he wants out. 

Philly gets a really good top 4 puck moving d-man. 

2. 
To Van - Scott Mayfield
To NYI- 2nd Rounder

Why does NYI do this? 
Expansion draft protection issues. Mayfield is likely the odd man out- even though he is well loved and on a great contract, Pulock, Pelech, Leddy all need to be protected, along with a bunch of forwards. 

Why does Vancouver do this?
1.5m contract for size and defensive responsibility, can kill penalties effectively. 

3.
Van-Col
To Van - Joonas Donskoi
To Col- 2022 2nd rounder + 2021 3rd rounder 

Why does Colorado do this?
Minimize expansion draft losses - they now have a spot to protect Nichushkin, and get 4m off their books. 
 

Why does Vancouver do this?
Legitimate top 6 winger who can score - likely costs us less than poaching Greenway from Minny (cost for him probably a 1st). 

UFA's:
Oleksiak - 3x4.5m
Palmieri - 2x3m (if we can make enough room, burying eriksson, getting Seattle to take Hotlby, etc.)

TLDR: Schmidt's contract (which is expensive now, and will likely not age well) gets replaced by a top 6 winger + a defensively responsible and big D-man. + We add size on the back end by signing Oleksiak. 

Next years lineup:

Donskoi-Petey-Boeser
Hoglander-Horvat-Pearson
Palmeiri-Miller-Podkolzin
Motte-Beagle-Highmore

Hughes-Oleksiak
Mayfield-Myers
Edler-Rathbone
*Juolevi
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 48MPHSlapShot said:

The only reason we landed Schmidt for a 3rd was because Vegas only had a 24 hour window to move him. That was never a true true indication of his value.

Agreed he's worth more - but him actually wanting a trade + his contract is going to make other GMs squeeze us. Most teams won't be able to afford taking on a 6m contract at this point. Rathbone was a nice surprise, and changes the game for us imo. 

It's not about getting absolute top dollar for Schmidt, its about getting the best lineup as a result. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, eeeeergh said:

but him actually wanting a trade

Complete rumour, denied by the player and the team, rumour re born by an easten reporter.

Then Dhaliwahl gave it legs by saying  "Still hearing Nate wants out".

 

 

Hey, Mr Dhaliwahl, I'm still hearing about Nate wanting out as well; not from anybody that would know, just from people saying the same baseless thing.

Edited by gurn
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, gurn said:

Complete rumour, denied by the player and the team, rumour re born by an easten reporter.

Then Dhaliwahl gave it legs by saying  "Still hearing Nate wants out".

Hopefully then we can get more for him - Schmidt for 2nd Rounder and a prospect (maybe we have to retain some salary Idk).

I still think we should trade him if we can - that 6m can really help us in other areas, given Rathbone's readiness. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, eeeeergh said:

Agreed he's worth more - but him actually wanting a trade + his contract is going to make other GMs squeeze us. Most teams won't be able to afford taking on a 6m contract at this point. Rathbone was a nice surprise, and changes the game for us imo. 

It's not about getting absolute top dollar for Schmidt, its about getting the best lineup as a result. 

It's just a rumor at this point, but even if we assume it's true, I'd rather hold off and try to convince him to play another year than sell him for scraps. I fully expect that, if he's deployed to his strengths, he'll have a much better season next year. 

 

Also, if he truly wants out then he should be willing to open up his 10 team no trade list.

 

Bottom line is if the return isnt there, I'd rather keep him.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...