FaninMex Posted July 11, 2021 Share Posted July 11, 2021 (edited) 1. Evander Kane for JV and this years 3rd round pick. 2. This goes out to Bertuzzipunch as I liked it. 9OA + Gadj for Greenway + 21OA 3. 21OA + 2nd + OJ + Eriksson for S. Reinhart and Risto. To sweeten it further a second next year if Reinhart extends.\ 4. Seattle takes Holtby In: Evander Kane Greenway Sam Reinhart Risto Out: JV Eriksson OJ Holtby Gadj 9OA 2nd this year 3rd this year 2nd next year if extend S. Reinhart Never been much for these hypothetical things so feel free to burn it down. Not sure of budget. Edited July 11, 2021 by FaninMex Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwijibo Posted July 11, 2021 Share Posted July 11, 2021 27 minutes ago, FaninMex said: 1. Evander Kane for JV and this years 3rd round pick. 2. This goes out to Bertuzzipunch as I liked it. 9OA + Gadj for Greenway + 21OA 3. 21OA + 2nd + OJ + Eriksson for S. Reinhart and Risto. To sweeten it further a second next year if Reinhart extends.\ 4. Seattle takes Holtby In: Evander Kane Greenway Sam Reinhart Risto Out: JV Eriksson OJ Holtby Gadj 9OA 2nd this year 3rd this year 2nd next year if extend S. Reinhart Never been much for these hypothetical things so feel free to burn it down. Not sure of budget. Why would SJ consider a Kane for Virtanen swap? Kane put up 49 points on 56 games this season. Virtanen may not even lace up his skates again Buffalo will get far better offers than that for those two players. Also. You can’t add conditional picks based on the player re-signing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrJockitch Posted July 11, 2021 Share Posted July 11, 2021 16 minutes ago, qwijibo said: Why would SJ consider a Kane for Virtanen swap? Kane put up 49 points on 56 games this season. Virtanen may not even lace up his skates again Buffalo will get far better offers than that for those two players. Also. You can’t add conditional picks based on the player re-signing. I was thinking the opposite, SJ is in the situation we were 2012, they need a rebuild badly but will opt for something less effective. They would love to get rid of EK but with his contract they would need to give us a lot to take him, not the other way around. This is also the last guy you want around your club. Huge debts, weird cult like life in his compound, massive gambling issues. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bad_BOI_pete Posted July 11, 2021 Share Posted July 11, 2021 1 hour ago, DrJockitch said: I was thinking the opposite, SJ is in the situation we were 2012, they need a rebuild badly but will opt for something less effective. They would love to get rid of EK but with his contract they would need to give us a lot to take him, not the other way around. This is also the last guy you want around your club. Huge debts, weird cult like life in his compound, massive gambling issues. ryan kesler was a cancer and he fetched two roster players a 1st and a third. evander kane ain't that much different. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JM_ Posted July 11, 2021 Share Posted July 11, 2021 (edited) 26 minutes ago, Petey_BOI said: ryan kesler was a cancer and he fetched two roster players a 1st and a third. evander kane ain't that much different. Kesler was anything but that Boi. Yes he wanted out to move to a contender because he could see the wiring on the wall about the teams competitiveness, but lets not cal him that, the guy gave it his all here. Edited July 11, 2021 by Jimmy McGill 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bad_BOI_pete Posted July 11, 2021 Share Posted July 11, 2021 2 minutes ago, Jimmy McGill said: Kesler was anything but that Boi. Yes he wanted out to move to a contender because he could see the wiring on the wall about the teams competitiveness, but lets not cal him that, the guy gave it his all here. well i heard otherwise. I have no idea why people would make up these type of rumours, so i believe it. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwijibo Posted July 11, 2021 Share Posted July 11, 2021 1 hour ago, DrJockitch said: I was thinking the opposite, SJ is in the situation we were 2012, they need a rebuild badly but will opt for something less effective. They would love to get rid of EK but with his contract they would need to give us a lot to take him, not the other way around. This is also the last guy you want around your club. Huge debts, weird cult like life in his compound, massive gambling issues. 47 points in 56 games. You can forgive a lot when a player actually contributes. They may not get a fair return for him if they look to move him, but they’ll get a much better offer than a 3rd and a disappointing bottom 6 player with character issues and a massive legal issue Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bad_BOI_pete Posted July 11, 2021 Share Posted July 11, 2021 Just now, qwijibo said: 47 points in 56 games. You can forgive a lot when a player actually contributes. They may not get a fair return for him if they look to move him, but they’ll get a much better offer than a 3rd and a disappointing bottom 6 player with character issues and a massive legal issue exactly! minimum a first and a DECENT prospect i'm sure san jose wouldn't mind retaining a 1m Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FaninMex Posted July 11, 2021 Author Share Posted July 11, 2021 13 minutes ago, qwijibo said: 47 points in 56 games. You can forgive a lot when a player actually contributes. They may not get a fair return for him if they look to move him, but they’ll get a much better offer than a 3rd and a disappointing bottom 6 player with character issues and a massive legal issue Fair enough. Read an article from some SJ reporter that they wanted to dump him to get some cap room and because of issues. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now