Me_ Posted July 17, 2021 Share Posted July 17, 2021 6 minutes ago, Scottydzik said: Lmao out of all teams with expansion problems Benning was only willing to pull out a fringe 3rd liner probably 4th line centre round of applause Time for bed, chicken soup. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Kenny Blankenship Posted July 17, 2021 Popular Post Share Posted July 17, 2021 Having a hard time seeing any negative in this. Elite defensive forward, at first glance, is something any team who can’t keep the puck out their net needs. I understand that our defense needs improving, but team defense requires all 5 guys, this should help. Consider me a fan of this trade. 2 7 2 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hamhuis Hip Check Posted July 17, 2021 Share Posted July 17, 2021 The only question i have is how foundational is he 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Devron Posted July 17, 2021 Share Posted July 17, 2021 8 minutes ago, Alflives said: 44% face-off guy isn’t exactly elite defensively. He is actually pretty good defensively Alf. Hopefully he can work on his faceoffs 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wayne Glensky Posted July 17, 2021 Share Posted July 17, 2021 JB actually came out with a W here. Solid third line center. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elias Pettersson Posted July 17, 2021 Share Posted July 17, 2021 8 minutes ago, Alflives said: 44% face-off guy isn’t exactly elite defensively. There's more to defensive play then just taking draws. Apparently Dickinson was Dallas's top PK'er last year... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coryberg Posted July 17, 2021 Share Posted July 17, 2021 5 minutes ago, VegasCanuck said: This trade does not automatically mean that Lind is unprotected. Pettersson Miller Boeser Horvat Pearson Dickenson One spot left... don't see us exposing Motte Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scottydzik Posted July 17, 2021 Share Posted July 17, 2021 3 minutes ago, King Heffy said: You'd also be ripping into him if he'd overpaid for a D. A 2nd n c prospect for leddy or graves wouldn’t of been over paying 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kenny Blankenship Posted July 17, 2021 Share Posted July 17, 2021 8 minutes ago, brian42 said: doesn't look to be all that much better than Boyd TBH at 26 years old with only career high of 22 points and not a good faceoff guy, never over 50%. looks like another wasted draft pick. Only the Canucks could trade away more picks than they acquire during a rebuild. part of me is glad they did something but if your relying on this guy as your 3rd line center, probly going to be disappointed. Bad take is bad. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AV. Posted July 17, 2021 Share Posted July 17, 2021 This is an okay deal on paper. Dickinson is a good age and can play a defensive game. Doesn't really do much else, however. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jayinblack Posted July 17, 2021 Share Posted July 17, 2021 1 minute ago, Kenny Blankenship said: Having a hard time seeing any negative in this. Elite defensive forward, at first glance, is something any team who can’t keep the puck out their net needs. I understand that our defense needs improving, but team defense requires all 5 guys, this should help. Consider me a fan of this trade. Especially being a good defensive C 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnny Torts Posted July 17, 2021 Share Posted July 17, 2021 3rd line Centre, check. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted July 17, 2021 Share Posted July 17, 2021 Just now, Devron44 said: He is actually pretty good defensively Alf. Hopefully he can work on his faceoffs We need a guy who can take D zone draws, so Bo dorsnt have to always do it. Yes, he’s decent depth, but is he worth protecting (he’s coming 27) over Lind? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dirtman Posted July 17, 2021 Share Posted July 17, 2021 1 minute ago, AV. said: This is an okay deal on paper. Dickinson is a good age and can play a defensive game. Doesn't really do much else, however. Our defense as a whole was pretty atrocious, this is a win imo. I'm sure Brad Shaw was high on this guy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
appleboy Posted July 17, 2021 Share Posted July 17, 2021 These are the kind of deals I was hoping for. Fill some defensive holes without giving up any high picks. We have the offense. We need a couple of stay at home defenseman now. Maybe another gritty bottom six forward. Do this without taking away or using a 1st or 2nd round pick. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Convincing John Posted July 17, 2021 Share Posted July 17, 2021 Honestly, Why does Jim love players where offence dies. Gross 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brian42 Posted July 17, 2021 Share Posted July 17, 2021 guy doesn't provide offense and you can't rely on him for a defensive draw, i see him as a 4th line center not 3'rd, with pk mins. hope he signs for no more than 1 million. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Provost Posted July 17, 2021 Share Posted July 17, 2021 1 minute ago, IRR said: Yes, but still time for that. Plus, multiple things need done. Also, it takes two to tangle and deals need to make sense / be fair. No point in making a deal just to make a deal. Some will never be happy! Doesn't make a deal because nothing made sense / came up with a team = Benning is useless. Makes a deal to make a deal = Benning doesn't know what he's doing & f'd up the trade. Lose lose for him around here!! He has genuinely earned all the criticism. Our team has been terrible for a long time…. Excuses about a thin prospect pool run out after about 4 years into a tenure, not a (new) 9 year plan. After last offseason being a debacle, that was his last life for me. Now he has to prove any moves by wins and losses on the ice before I will give him much credit. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VegasCanuck Posted July 17, 2021 Share Posted July 17, 2021 (edited) 3 minutes ago, coryberg said: Pettersson Miller Boeser Horvat Pearson Dickenson One spot left... don't see us exposing Motte I love how Motte plays, but he is more easily replaced than Lind, in terms of raw skill. I believe that we protect Lind and make a deal to ensure that they take Holtby. Edited July 17, 2021 by VegasCanuck 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Devron Posted July 17, 2021 Share Posted July 17, 2021 2 minutes ago, coryberg said: Pettersson Miller Boeser Horvat Pearson Dickenson One spot left... don't see us exposing Motte Doesn’t matter because they are taking Holtby Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.