amplified0ne Posted July 18, 2021 Share Posted July 18, 2021 Some decent D available on the available list, maybe GMJB can swing a deal for one of them i.e. Jake Bean even though he's left shot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
amplified0ne Posted July 18, 2021 Share Posted July 18, 2021 Some decent D available on the available list, maybe GMJB can swing a deal for one of them i.e. Jake Bean even though he's left shot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jtutino Posted July 18, 2021 Share Posted July 18, 2021 Interesting NYI exposed Bailey and Eberle but protected Clutterbuck. Bailey had 33 points in the last 2 playoffs. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iinatcc Posted July 18, 2021 Share Posted July 18, 2021 12 minutes ago, Where's Wellwood said: The UFA more likely to leave his current team is Landeskog Good point either way I would at least try to go for Landeskog or Ovi Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coryberg Posted July 18, 2021 Share Posted July 18, 2021 If I were the Seattle GM (I left out the UFA's) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted July 18, 2021 Share Posted July 18, 2021 14 minutes ago, Where's Wellwood said: The UFA more likely to leave his current team is Landeskog Huge loss for Little Joe’s Avs. His job could go ‘poof’ soon. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VegasCanuck Posted July 18, 2021 Share Posted July 18, 2021 25 minutes ago, iinatcc said: Yep but I would still take the risk by selecting Ovi. You don't have to risk, if you're Seattle, you a already free to talk to him. If you can convince him to sign, great. If you can't, you're wasting a pick. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Makaramel MacKhiato Posted July 18, 2021 Share Posted July 18, 2021 Cal Foote is a crazy name. Wish Canucks could've got a deal done to take him, and expose Juolevi. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Makaramel MacKhiato Posted July 18, 2021 Share Posted July 18, 2021 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
73 Percent Posted July 18, 2021 Share Posted July 18, 2021 6 minutes ago, coryberg said: If I were the Seattle GM (I left out the UFA's) Is that under the cap? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Master Mind Posted July 18, 2021 Share Posted July 18, 2021 11 minutes ago, Jtutino said: Interesting NYI exposed Bailey and Eberle but protected Clutterbuck. Bailey had 33 points in the last 2 playoffs. For me, those two and Price are the most surprising players to be exposed. I know the Islanders 4th line is a big part of their team, but hard to justify losing a great playoff performer in Bailey, or a player that works well with Barzal in Eberle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted July 18, 2021 Share Posted July 18, 2021 1 minute ago, Master Mind said: For me, those two and Price are the most surprising players to be exposed. I know the Islanders 4th line is a big part of their team, but hard to justify losing a great playoff performer in Bailey, or a player that works well with Barzal in Eberle. Lou Lam is the King of GMs. He has that Islander team competing for Cups. Incredible the Loser Leafs forced him out so they could go with Dubas. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post -Vintage Canuck- Posted July 18, 2021 Author Popular Post Share Posted July 18, 2021 9 minutes ago, Top Sven Baercheese said: That roster has a better chance of winning a playoff round than the Leafs roster. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dazzle Posted July 18, 2021 Share Posted July 18, 2021 3 minutes ago, Master Mind said: For me, those two and Price are the most surprising players to be exposed. I know the Islanders 4th line is a big part of their team, but hard to justify losing a great playoff performer in Bailey, or a player that works well with Barzal in Eberle. Islanders are by far the biggest losers in this expansion draft, as you highlighted. They had to pony up to get rid of Andrew Ladd's 5.5 million dollar contract, by sacrificing a second round pick for this year, 2022, AND a 3rd round pick for 2023. For nothing. Let that sink in. On top of this, they potentially lose Bailey, who as you said was tremendous this playoffs, but so was Eberle. I dunno if there's anything else. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coryberg Posted July 18, 2021 Share Posted July 18, 2021 17 minutes ago, 73 Percent said: Is that under the cap? Almost 10 mil under Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coryberg Posted July 18, 2021 Share Posted July 18, 2021 8 minutes ago, Dazzle said: Islanders are by far the biggest losers in this expansion draft, as you highlighted. They had to pony up to get rid of Andrew Ladd's 5.5 million dollar contract, by sacrificing a second round pick for this year, 2022, AND a 3rd round pick for 2023. For nothing. Let that sink in. On top of this, they potentially lose Bailey, who as you said was tremendous this playoffs, but so was Eberle. I dunno if there's anything else. Yep...As crappy as LE's contract was its still a year shorter than Ladd and lucic's. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coryberg Posted July 18, 2021 Share Posted July 18, 2021 24 minutes ago, 73 Percent said: Is that under the cap? Having a second look I would actually pass on bishop (got price). That makes it 15 mil under Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-AJ- Posted July 18, 2021 Share Posted July 18, 2021 I still expect Seattle to fight for 3rd in the Pacific next year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrJockitch Posted July 18, 2021 Share Posted July 18, 2021 Man, if wanted to be aggressive there are some side deals that patch some big holes. Appleton, Zadorov… would be expensive but may be prime opportunity to plug some gaping holes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mll Posted July 18, 2021 Share Posted July 18, 2021 1 hour ago, Jimmy McGill said: its interesting to see the approach this time by GMs, basically daring Seattle to take money and term. I wonder if we'd see this sans covid, or if the cap was 87 million instead of 81. The Canucks really don't have to make a deal with Seattle, which is a good place to be in. There should be some good trade opportunities for them on Thursday afternoon too. There could be some players they like. Might be cheaper through Seattle and some players might not otherwise be available. Last time Vegas made their picks and then tried to trade their excess players - they had some players who found no takers like Pulkkinen who then spent the season in the AHL. With the flat cap, Seattle might prefer to already know they have a trade partner for their excess selections or they might simply pick a UFA rather than have too many players on their hands - better to get a return than nothing. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now