PunjabiCanucks Posted July 21, 2021 Share Posted July 21, 2021 With the lack of centres and top 6 power the Kraken have at the moment and with them signing good Dmen, we may have an opportunity to save cap and improve our D. With Poldkozin potentially able to step in to our top 6 , can we flip Miller for Larsson - it adds more strength to our D that looks weak since Edler/ Hamonic have departed. In the End Seattle acquires Miller for 2 yrs left at 5.25 Million Canucks acquire a dman in Larsson for 4 years that can slot into our 2nd pairing, hit, play 20 minutes a game for 4 Million Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhillipBlunt Posted July 21, 2021 Share Posted July 21, 2021 Wrong forum. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wallstreetamigo Posted July 21, 2021 Share Posted July 21, 2021 No chance they signed Larsson only to trade him right away. They got a great cap hit and term for Larsson. Its a bad look for them to sign a guy to a good ufa contract only to turn around and trade him. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RWJC Posted July 21, 2021 Share Posted July 21, 2021 Just now, PhillipBlunt said: Wrong forum. And no thx, much appreciated though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HKSR Posted July 21, 2021 Share Posted July 21, 2021 Uhhh... you trade Miller, you get WAY more than just Larsson. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kanucks25 Posted July 21, 2021 Share Posted July 21, 2021 No Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VegasCanuck Posted July 21, 2021 Share Posted July 21, 2021 19 minutes ago, PunjabiCanucks said: With the lack of centres and top 6 power the Kraken have at the moment and with them signing good Dmen, we may have an opportunity to save cap and improve our D. With Poldkozin potentially able to step in to our top 6 , can we flip Miller for Larsson - it adds more strength to our D that looks weak since Edler/ Hamonic have departed. In the End Seattle acquires Miller for 2 yrs left at 5.25 Million Canucks acquire a dman in Larsson for 4 years that can slot into our 2nd pairing, hit, play 20 minutes a game for 4 Million You really think, in a million years, that Seattle is going to trade a guy that they just signed on their defense as a UFA? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted July 21, 2021 Share Posted July 21, 2021 (edited) Edited July 21, 2021 by Alflives 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PunjabiCanucks Posted July 21, 2021 Author Share Posted July 21, 2021 Their could have been a deal done prior with another team for all we know, asset management at the end of the day . We don't know if Larsson got a NMC/NTC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JM_ Posted July 21, 2021 Share Posted July 21, 2021 27 minutes ago, PunjabiCanucks said: With the lack of centres and top 6 power the Kraken have at the moment and with them signing good Dmen, we may have an opportunity to save cap and improve our D. With Poldkozin potentially able to step in to our top 6 , can we flip Miller for Larsson - it adds more strength to our D that looks weak since Edler/ Hamonic have departed. In the End Seattle acquires Miller for 2 yrs left at 5.25 Million Canucks acquire a dman in Larsson for 4 years that can slot into our 2nd pairing, hit, play 20 minutes a game for 4 Million Miller>Larsson. We don't have enough top 9 depth to lose Miller, even with Podz coming in. We can go for a guy like Hakanpaa for a lot less and bring in some size too. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-DLC- Posted July 21, 2021 Share Posted July 21, 2021 No to giving Miller to anyone. For anything. NO, in this voice: 1 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewbieCanuckFan Posted July 21, 2021 Share Posted July 21, 2021 (edited) 34 minutes ago, Alflives said: That’s the reaction from all the women every time I ask for a date. Edited July 21, 2021 by NewbieCanuckFan 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YEGCanuck Posted July 21, 2021 Share Posted July 21, 2021 58 minutes ago, wallstreetamigo said: No chance they signed Larsson only to trade him right away. They got a great cap hit and term for Larsson. Its a bad look for them to sign a guy to a good ufa contract only to turn around and trade him. You are probably right, however I just have a feeling Jimbo has some sort of deal worked out with the Karken and I wouldn't discount a Larsson trade to the Canucks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Devron Posted July 21, 2021 Share Posted July 21, 2021 (edited) This trade is sucky. Miller is a beauty and it doesn’t make sense to subtract from one area to add to another. Without Miller our forward group sucks and our defence only get a little bit better. That proposal sucks I’m sorry Edited July 21, 2021 by Devron44 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NHL'er Posted July 21, 2021 Share Posted July 21, 2021 32 minutes ago, -DLC- said: No to giving Miller to anyone. For anything. NO, in this voice: 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wallstreetamigo Posted July 21, 2021 Share Posted July 21, 2021 Lets all just realize the idea of Larsson patrolling the right side next to Hughes is gone. Next man up mentality now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patel Bure Posted July 21, 2021 Share Posted July 21, 2021 3 hours ago, wallstreetamigo said: No chance they signed Larsson only to trade him right away. They got a great cap hit and term for Larsson. Its a bad look for them to sign a guy to a good ufa contract only to turn around and trade him. Hate to admit it but you are 100% correct here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigbadcanucks Posted July 21, 2021 Share Posted July 21, 2021 2 hours ago, NewbieCanuckFan said: That’s the reaction from all the women every time I ask for a date. Laughing WITH you, not at you. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GB5 Posted July 22, 2021 Share Posted July 22, 2021 Larsson could have easily got more money and term had he waited until free agnecy officially opened up to sign but went with Seattle for a reason. Partially due to a favorable tax structure but I think the other reason being he was looking to avoid the microscope he was in in Edmonton after the Hall trade. Vancouver could be hard on the guy too and he probably knew that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigTramFan Posted July 22, 2021 Share Posted July 22, 2021 10 hours ago, wallstreetamigo said: No chance they signed Larsson only to trade him right away. They got a great cap hit and term for Larsson. Its a bad look for them to sign a guy to a good ufa contract only to turn around and trade him. ...and Larsson has a full NTC. The Larsson train has left the station. Move on Canucks fans! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now