Popular Post Alflives Posted July 23, 2021 Popular Post Share Posted July 23, 2021 Not so bad when realizing we’re dumping three toxic contracts and getting OEL and Garland. The cost to dump a toxic contract like Loui’s last year is our first. So I’m okay with this. Let’s get back to the playoffs! 7 13 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rick_theRyper Posted July 23, 2021 Share Posted July 23, 2021 1 minute ago, rekker said: No thanks, unless money retained on OEL. If we get a decent % retained this is a wjn 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Spoosh Posted July 23, 2021 Popular Post Share Posted July 23, 2021 7 minutes ago, timberz21 said: 9th overall has to be included, which i'm fine with. I just hope there is salary going back and some retention on OEL, otherwise it's not worth it for short-term cap release. 1st this year is more ok than any other, as this is a very difficult draft class to evaluate. So if the package is right then I’m all in. OEL to me is a big + for us and getting both him and Garland would be huge. 1 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Johnny Torts Posted July 23, 2021 Popular Post Share Posted July 23, 2021 Holy &^@#. We could be a nasty &^@#ing team next year. 2 4 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Bure_Pavel Posted July 23, 2021 Popular Post Share Posted July 23, 2021 Not liking the deal as is could have just waited another year to shed cap and got a A+ prospect. 1 3 1 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Filthy McNasty Posted July 23, 2021 Share Posted July 23, 2021 It will be 9th over all and start dumps to be players in free agency 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rekker Posted July 23, 2021 Share Posted July 23, 2021 Just now, erkayloomeh said: LE AR and our 9th for garland and oel w 2 ml retained If the two million is retained, this is actually not bad. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post JM_ Posted July 23, 2021 Popular Post Share Posted July 23, 2021 we now have a definition for "aggressive" holy $&!# 7 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post -Vintage Canuck- Posted July 23, 2021 Author Popular Post Share Posted July 23, 2021 3 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kobayashi Maru Posted July 23, 2021 Share Posted July 23, 2021 3 minutes ago, KelownaCanucksFan said: That is a top 9 that could be very very good, but we still need to add lots of help in the d core, no point in scoring 5-6 goals a game but let in 7 Hughes - Hamonic Ekman-Larsson - Myers Joulevi - TBD That would be pretty damn good, but we’ll see how it shakes out. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Devron Posted July 23, 2021 Share Posted July 23, 2021 Wondering if Schmidt gets us back into the draft today? 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Provost Posted July 23, 2021 Popular Post Share Posted July 23, 2021 (edited) This is going to shock people to hear me say… but it could have been worse! (That is where the bar is at) If he can follow it up by bringing in useful players with all the cap space it “could” even turn into a win. If he suddenly has the cap space to sign both Petterson and Hughes to max term deals at a reasonable number it could also turn into a win (at least down the road). Edited July 23, 2021 by Provost 4 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stech Posted July 23, 2021 Share Posted July 23, 2021 Watch Kent Johnson put up 100 point seasons in his career for Arizona. I’m gonna be sick. 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Heffy Posted July 23, 2021 Share Posted July 23, 2021 I'm furious here. Hopefully there's a follow up trade to unload OEL. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JM_ Posted July 23, 2021 Share Posted July 23, 2021 Just now, rekker said: If the two million is retained, this is actually not bad. I suspect Garland is the cost for no salary retention 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Master Mind Posted July 23, 2021 Share Posted July 23, 2021 Would have been much more exciting if they waited till it was the Canucks turn to draft, allowing Gary to say "We have a trade" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post The.Burrowers Posted July 23, 2021 Popular Post Share Posted July 23, 2021 This was necessary. JT Miller et al will appreciate it. 7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post b3. Posted July 23, 2021 Popular Post Share Posted July 23, 2021 Just now, Devron44 said: Wondering if Schmidt gets us back into the draft today? Does Schmidt want to stay now? 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EP Phone Home Posted July 23, 2021 Share Posted July 23, 2021 We shot who in the what now? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeltaSwede Posted July 23, 2021 Share Posted July 23, 2021 It has got to be some retained salary on OEL. I am more than okay with this if that is the case. An OEL at around 6 mil is a thumbs up from me. Trade Schmidt for picks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.