oldnews Posted July 28, 2021 Share Posted July 28, 2021 12 minutes ago, Scottydzik said: I’m suggesting I bet he could had for c prospect and maybe a 4th yep they have no cap for him then they're welcome to send Connor Murphy here for a song.... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gurn Posted July 28, 2021 Share Posted July 28, 2021 8 minutes ago, PhillipBlunt said: Really? They were disappointed? “These magnificent apex predators can kill and disembowel a great white shark for its liver.” ”But…but….it’s just a dolphin!” Could have used a dolphin when this was going on! 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rick_theRyper Posted July 28, 2021 Share Posted July 28, 2021 31 minutes ago, Dazzle said: Pearson's signing was fine dude. This false narrative that he's overpaid keeps getting perpetuated lol. Simply said the order of our signings was and is becoming an issue. Offering Pearson an extension with. nTC was not needed during a bogus season! lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
appleboy Posted July 28, 2021 Share Posted July 28, 2021 Jim should have no problem attracting UFA's. They can expect to get paid more than their worth. The Canucks will throw in at least one extra year and at the end of your contract you will get to spend the winter in Arizona. 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Heffy Posted July 28, 2021 Share Posted July 28, 2021 13 minutes ago, kanucks25 said: You do realize that the vocal minority is actually CDC? lol Most of CDC, other than a few posters, is pretty happy with the offseason so far. The correct place for the whiners is HFboards. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stawns Posted July 28, 2021 Share Posted July 28, 2021 3 minutes ago, gurn said: Could have used a dolphin when this was going on! "just a dolphin maam" classic 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KyGuy123 Posted July 28, 2021 Share Posted July 28, 2021 58 minutes ago, PositionOfPower said: This is the aggressive big bad Benning that we always wanted that shipped off without mecry Seguin for his behaviour issues No this is a owner willing to back his GM and right the wrong. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dazzle Posted July 28, 2021 Share Posted July 28, 2021 1 minute ago, Rick_theRyper said: Simply said the order of our signings was and is becoming an issue. Offering Pearson an extension with. nTC was not needed during a bogus season! lol What issue? Horvat was especially happy that Pearson was signed. That means something. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KyGuy123 Posted July 28, 2021 Share Posted July 28, 2021 55 minutes ago, 48MPHSlapShot said: I think Tampa would be more willing to ship Johnson off for a pick than they would be to cough up anything significant from their roster. If I'm a GM and my team's window is wide open, I'm doing everything I can to hold on to every significant piece of my two time Stanley Cup winning team that I can. Or, considering it's Tampa, I simply wait for a mysteriously well timed injury to hit so I can put someone on LTIR. Who’s taking Johnson for a pick? That would have happened 2 years ago Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Heffy Posted July 28, 2021 Share Posted July 28, 2021 (edited) Pretty sure there's a few seats left along with the rest of the guys Benning has to give a ride. Anyone who isn't happy with the offseason can hop on. Edited July 28, 2021 by King Heffy 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhillipBlunt Posted July 28, 2021 Share Posted July 28, 2021 3 minutes ago, appleboy said: Jim should have no problem attracting UFA's. They can expect to get paid more than their worth. The Canucks will throw in at least one extra year and at the end of your contract you will get to spend the winter in Arizona. Ha….ha….ha. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
48MPHSlapShot Posted July 28, 2021 Share Posted July 28, 2021 Just now, KyGuy123 said: Who’s taking Johnson for a pick? That would have happened 2 years ago Two years ago he had less term on his contract, and he's still a decent player. Just happens to be way overpaid for what he brings. If I'm a rebuilding team in need of players to fill out a roster and Tampa is willing to ship a first to get rid of Johnson, I'd take it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
appleboy Posted July 28, 2021 Share Posted July 28, 2021 I see some of you are preparing to wear bags on your head. Just in case this goes sideways Lol 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scottydzik Posted July 28, 2021 Share Posted July 28, 2021 Let’s go Benning it’s time to grow even bigger pair Rath Macewen 2023 2nd for tarasenko 25 retained bortuzzo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Googlie Posted July 28, 2021 Share Posted July 28, 2021 2 minutes ago, Dazzle said: What issue? Horvat was especially happy that Pearson was signed. That means something. But can his judgment be trusted? He thought his line was better with Eriksson as his winger 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kanucks25 Posted July 28, 2021 Share Posted July 28, 2021 (edited) 7 minutes ago, King Heffy said: Most of CDC, other than a few posters, is pretty happy with the offseason so far. The correct place for the whiners is HFboards. I mean that if you look pretty much anywhere else, the general thought is that Benning hasn't exactly done a great job. It's the opposite here, but only here. The results support one "side", I'll let you guess which one. The other can only offer meaningless rhetoric having to do with "the plan" and "patience". Quite Trumpian, actually. "This will be the greatest rebuild ever, people tell me, all the time, it's remarkable. Everywhere I go the people say it. We're doing a great job." Edited July 28, 2021 by kanucks25 3 1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kanucks25 Posted July 28, 2021 Share Posted July 28, 2021 3 minutes ago, Dazzle said: What issue? Horvat was especially happy that Pearson was signed. That means something. Out of 10, how happy was he? And under the same scale, how unhappy was Hughes that Tanev was let go? (your choice if you want to consider the fact that the guy they booted him out for has also just been booted out a year later). 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhillipBlunt Posted July 28, 2021 Share Posted July 28, 2021 1 minute ago, kanucks25 said: I mean that if you look pretty much anywhere else, the general thought is that Benning hasn't exactly done a great job. It's the opposite here, but only here. The results support one "side", I'll let you guess which one. The other can only offer meaningless rhetoric having to do with "the plan" and "patience. Quite Trumpian, actually. "This will be the greatest rebuild ever, people tell me, all the time, it's remarkable. Everywhere I go the people say it. We're doing a great job." You should post your tweets on Bleacher Report. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gurn Posted July 28, 2021 Share Posted July 28, 2021 5 minutes ago, Googlie said: But can his judgment be trusted? He thought his line was better with Eriksson as his winger Well he was right, Pearson and Horvat without any right winger would just get overworked and tired. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dazzle Posted July 28, 2021 Share Posted July 28, 2021 1 minute ago, kanucks25 said: I mean that if you look pretty much anywhere else, the general thought is that Benning hasn't exactly done a great job. It's the opposite here, but only here. The results support one "side", I'll let you guess which one. The other can only offer meaningless rhetoric having to do with "the plan" and "patience. Quite Trumpian, actually. "This will be the greatest rebuild ever, people tell me, all the time, it's remarkable. Everywhere I go the people say it. We're doing a great job." And it's hilarious because the so-called "one side" is actually more balanced because we ACKNOWLEDGE Benning's mistakes, but we're able to recognize the good - like, you know, DRAFTING. Apparently Benning sucks at drafting according to you, if we were to take you as a representative. You STILL cling onto the Gillis legacy days about how he was "building a winning team", so he somehow had the excuse to suck at drafting players outside of the first round. It's all about balance - and the so-called "anti-Benning" crowd only criticize, but never recognize the good parts. In fact, they change the narratives to make Benning look worse. That's flat out dishonesty. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now