Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

[Rumor] Brandon Sutter re-signing in van


Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, DeNiro said:

2 years at 1 mil would be nice.

 

Can center the 4th line.

I'd rather have 1 year 2 mil after we sign Petey and Huggy.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Junkyard Dog said:

We have payed you enough Brando. Reward us with 1M or under.

Agreed. He had that one good game last year. He is too much of a passenger to get anything substantial.

  • Thanks 1
  • Vintage 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

He can f off if its anything over 1 mil.

 

Guy needs to eat some cheeseburgers or get in the gym not enough bulk or strength for a traditional 4 liner.

 

Was hoping he was not brought back...:sick:

 

 

Edited by Chip Kelly
  • Hydration 1
  • Haha 2
  • Wat 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm fine with bringing him back, as long as it's cheap and he's willing to play a reduced role. We do have a lack of decent centers in our bottom six. He does generally play pretty well when he's healthy.

 

Hopefully playing a reduced role will help him stay healthy.

  • Hydration 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, DeNiro said:

Need him for face offs and pk duty.

 

Beagle was a big loss in that department.

If it’s under a million then so be it. Anything more than that let him walk. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Sutter is a good guy to have for leadership. After his hockey career I think he would make a good coach. For a fair price he will be a good piece for our fourth line C

  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Bertuzzipunch said:

 

I don’t mind the signing at all if it’s 2 million or under.  The Canucks will need a good RH face off guy that can kill penalties and provide bottom 6 scoring.  If Boyd wants to test free agency, then I have no problem at all in bringing Sutter back.

  • Hydration 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd be fine with Sutter as a 4c, at a lower cap he's certainly not a bad option. Bottom line is we do need someone to PK and take defensive zone draws, and he's a capable defensive player. 

 

Sutter at 2m or less ain't a problem, Sutter at 4.3m was. 

  • Thanks 1
  • Upvote 2
  • Vintage 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Patel Bure said:

I don’t mind the signing at all if it’s 2 million or under.  The Canucks will need a good RH face off guy that can kill penalties and provide bottom 6 scoring.  If Boyd wants to test free agency, then I have no problem at all in bringing Sutter back.

Dude Sutter scores like 5 goals in 2 games then disappears for 30. He won’t provide you with any offence. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...