Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

[Signing] Canucks sign Tucker Poolman


Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Elias Pettersson said:

The fact that Hakanpaa isn’t signed yet is very telling. Maybe we overrated him?

Maybe he's considering multiple options.

  • Vintage 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Bure_Pavel said:

Because we dont have a 5/6 and we just spent our remaining cap. 

Remaining cap based on what?

 

Projections that no one actually knows?

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, DeNiro said:

We don’t know how much cap we have because we haven’t signed Petey or Hughes.

Not signing both Petey and Hughes to long term contracts would be a huge mistake imo. 

  • Vintage 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
45 minutes ago, aGENT said:

Would CDC have preferred Ceci at the 4x$3.25 EDM gave him?

Amazingly, a certain sector would.  Personally, I got more than my fill of Ceci when I lived in Ottawa.  But I'll look forward to watching him again in Deadmonton!

  • Haha 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Chicken. said:

I guess nhl.com shorts him a bit unfortunately. glad to know he's over-sized.

 

Tucker Poolman | #3

D | 6' 2" | 199 lb | Age: 28

Yeah I saw that. If you watch him play he’s much bigger than that.  

 

  • Upvote 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, DeNiro said:

Would still like to add another top 4 D man.

 

Poolman can fill the role that Benn did the last couple years.

 

The way I see things now.

 

OEL - UFA/Trade

Hughes Hamonic

Rathbone Myers

 

Juolevi Poolman

 

Need a better top 4 guy IMO

we aren't paying 2.5m for a D who doesn't play top 6

  • Wat 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, AV. said:

Respectfully, what the &^@# are you talking about?

 

He listed his D pairings as

Hughes - UFA

OEL - Hamonic

Rathbone - Myers

Juolevi - Poolman

 

I told him that we did not just spend 4 x 2.5M on a 7th/8th D hence he should expect Poolman to play in that "UFA" spot in the top 4.

 

I don't why you're bringing up the fact that 6 D play at all times when that has literally nothing to do what's being discussed.

 

Reading is hard, I know, so I hope this helps.

I was just wondering and helping 

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Sooo what we've got on the left:

OEL, Hughes, Juolevi

On the right:
Hamonic, Poolman, Myers

Going to reserve judgement on Poolman til we see him in a few games, and gonna try to find some Winnipeg footage. But if he can block shots and be a solid stay at home guy, this excites me

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not a fan of this for 2.5mil per, really makes me wish we kept Stecher. Oh well. What's done is done, we were in desperate need for RHD. We got one.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Bure_Pavel said:

Because we dont have a 5/6 and we just spent our remaining cap. 

Huh?

 

OEL Myers

Hughes Harmonic

OJ/jR Poolman

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Bure_Pavel said:

Not signing both Petey and Hughes to long term contracts would be a huge mistake imo. 

Yet it’s exactly what they’ve been discussing.

 

Hughes should absolutely be on a bridge deal unless he’s willing to sign for 6-7 long term now.

 

Pettersson would be great to get long term but I doubt his agent feels that way. Much more potential for him to earn 9+ in a few years.

Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, AV. said:

Regardless, they felt fit to spend assets to replace the likes of Poolman.  That obviously doesn't speak too well to how they viewed Poolman as a top 4 option.

How so? Just because a UFO is sighted doesn't mean there's aliens. Just because Poolman left doesn't mean they didn't value his services.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, DeNiro said:

Remaining cap based on what?

 

Projections that no one actually knows?

Im guessing 8.5 X 7 years for Petey

7.5 X 7 Years for Hughes 

Dickinson still needs to be signed 

Dont know where we are going to come up with an extra 3 million to sign a Dman better than Poolman. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, N7Nucks said:

Not a fan of this for 2.5mil per, really makes me wish we kept Stecher. Oh well. What's done is done, we were in desperate need for RHD. We got one.

I was pretty tired of watching stetcher being flicked away like a bug.  We have Hughes for that now

  • Haha 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, 48MPHSlapShot said:

I don't see what we have left to trade.

Depends on which teams miss out who which guys. Myers only has a modified NTC, with only three years left he could theoretically be moved out if we were to find another RD management felt they'd rather have. 

 

He's not nearly as worthless as some Canucks fans make him out to be. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Canuckster86 said:

we aren't paying 2.5m for a D who doesn't play top 6

He will play top 6.

 

Why can’t he rotate in and out like Benn did?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...