Kobayashi Maru Posted February 16, 2022 Share Posted February 16, 2022 17 minutes ago, stawns said: They've got miller on an elc still and though he'll get a raise, he's not going to break the bank on his next contract either. They're in good shape capwise. I know he's lhd, but would they take miller in a miller deal, rather than Schneider? Hughes. Hamonic OEL. Myers Miller. Schenn It’s definitely possible, but if that happens Hughes or OEL switch sides. If they move Hamonic too I would go with: Miller Hughes OEL Myers Rathbone Schenn 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stawns Posted February 16, 2022 Share Posted February 16, 2022 18 minutes ago, Fanuck said: I much prefer Schneider over K'A. Never thought K'A used his size as effectively as he could and Schneider in my view is more versatile. As for cap, they're worried about losing Strome which is why Allvin should be leveraging the heck out of them since Miller is an upgrade over Strome for them in almost every aspect. I do as well, I'm just considering the "Schneider is untouchable" scenario. If you go with Miller, does Laffy or Kakko become the focal point? Or is Miller, Kravstov and a 1st enough for Miller? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coconuts Posted February 16, 2022 Share Posted February 16, 2022 (edited) 1 hour ago, aGENT said: Like I get they REALLY like Schneider. But where's he fitting, behind Fox and Trouba for the next 4.5 years? Whereas on the left, they have Lindgren and Miller and then some decent but unlikely as high of ceiling guys (beyond maybe Robertson). Maybe somebody knows something I don't, but it sure looks like Schneider and/or Lundkvist are more expendable than Miller. Exactly, he's not displacing Fox or Trouba any time soon. Schneider is a luxury they can afford to part with. New York is one of the few teams actually set really well on RD. Edited February 16, 2022 by Coconuts 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fanuck Posted February 16, 2022 Share Posted February 16, 2022 22 minutes ago, stawns said: I do as well, I'm just considering the "Schneider is untouchable" scenario. If you go with Miller, does Laffy or Kakko become the focal point? Or is Miller, Kravstov and a 1st enough for Miller? No, if they're offering K'A he's the ancillary piece to Lafrenier in my view. I would be satisfied with that deal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kacholu Posted February 16, 2022 Share Posted February 16, 2022 1 hour ago, Gator said: Kakko + Schnieder + 1st Yes thank you!! Get this return or don't trade him Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Codez27 Posted February 16, 2022 Share Posted February 16, 2022 22 minutes ago, kacholu said: Yes thank you!! Get this return or don't trade him I agree 100% The minimum is Schneider, 1st and one of the following kakko/laff/kravtsov. Even then we are in the immediate interim worse. We don't win a JT miller trade this year or next. It doesn't make us better until realistically 2 years down the road, EVEN with a the massive return above. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RWJC Posted February 16, 2022 Share Posted February 16, 2022 51 minutes ago, Fanuck said: No, if they're offering K'A he's the ancillary piece to Lafrenier in my view. I would be satisfied with that deal. What about this blockbuster... Miller + Garland + Rathbone for Lafreniere + Miller + Schneider + Kravtsov + 2023 2nd Do we do this deal? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MeanSeanBean Posted February 16, 2022 Share Posted February 16, 2022 Just now, RWJC said: What about this blockbuster... Miller + Garland + Rathbone for Lafreniere + Miller + Schneider + Kravtsov + 2023 2nd Do we do this deal? Hell yeah. Go big or go home. Retool could be complete if that trade hits. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kacholu Posted February 16, 2022 Share Posted February 16, 2022 Just now, RWJC said: What about this blockbuster... Miller + Garland + Rathbone for Lafreniere + Miller + Schneider + Kravtsov + 2023 2nd Do we do this deal? Not at all! I would do it if we do only Miller at 50% We are giving up way too much in this. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J-23 Posted February 16, 2022 Share Posted February 16, 2022 (edited) Has there been any news or rumours regarding Boston recently? Edited February 16, 2022 by J-23 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MeanSeanBean Posted February 16, 2022 Share Posted February 16, 2022 Just now, J-23 said: Has there been anything regarding Boston? Not for a bit. I really don't know what they have to offer if they're trying to load up for a shot. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J-23 Posted February 16, 2022 Share Posted February 16, 2022 Just now, Shayster007 said: Not for a bit. I really don't know what they have to offer if they're trying to load up for a shot. Lysell would be the starting point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J-23 Posted February 16, 2022 Share Posted February 16, 2022 6 minutes ago, RWJC said: What about this blockbuster... Miller + Garland + Rathbone for Lafreniere + Miller + Schneider + Kravtsov + 2023 2nd Do we do this deal? Do the Rags have the cap space for this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fanuck Posted February 16, 2022 Share Posted February 16, 2022 12 minutes ago, RWJC said: Do we do this deal? Yes, yes we do. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hammertime Posted February 16, 2022 Share Posted February 16, 2022 10 minutes ago, J-23 said: Do the Rags have the cap space for this? they van fit Garland + Rathbone no problem and we get Miller back so it's a pretty sweet deal actually. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Outsiders Posted February 16, 2022 Popular Post Share Posted February 16, 2022 3 hours ago, Mike Vanderhoek said: Listening to some of the New York media is a little eye rolling right now. Heard on the radio and online that New York would maybe consider Lundkvist and a pick. Chytil sounds like too much.....suggestions that Schneider, even a 1st with say Lundkvist is a no as the team has untouchable assets. I am sorry, homer bias? The Canucks hold the keys here and can name their price. Its too bad the Rangers have tabled an offer that didn't meet expectations by the Canucks. If you want Miller that badly, well a team is going to pay. So before anyone suggests I'm being a homer, the Canucks have what rejected an offer already or not looked favorably upon it ? On 650 the thought was that offer likely included Kravtsov, Lundkvist, a 1st or 2nd ? A unhappy Russian who wasn't good enough to play on the team, a small RHD who wasn't good enough to stick on their team and a late first rounder. Gee what could go wrong making that trade. The Rangers are basically saying we don't want to give up our top 5 prospects. But after that you can chose one or two We probably won't get one of LAF or KK. Fair enough. But in no world should Schneider, Othmann or Barron for that matter be untouchables as well. Its funny because the Rangers are like Lundkvist has been passed on the depth chart by Schneider who will only play on the bottom pair as Fox and Trouba are never going anywhere. So the Rangers are like yeah ok we will trade the guy who we have no room for and the guy who ever wants to play for us again for your #1 C If WASH or PITS wanted Miller I'd stick it to the Rangers 1 2 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghostsof1915 Posted February 16, 2022 Share Posted February 16, 2022 No to retained salary on any Canuck player. It defeats the purpose of trading them. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coryberg Posted February 16, 2022 Share Posted February 16, 2022 23 minutes ago, Outsiders said: If WASH or PITS wanted Miller I'd stick it to the Rangers Neither of those teams have the pieces needed to land Miller. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Ghostsof1915 Posted February 16, 2022 Popular Post Share Posted February 16, 2022 Don't ban me for this one. And it's worth it if I get a warning. 8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Coconuts Posted February 16, 2022 Popular Post Share Posted February 16, 2022 4 minutes ago, Ghostsof1915 said: Don't ban me for this one. And it's worth it if I get a warning. 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts