Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

[Rumour] J.T. Miller Trade/Contract Talks


Podzilla

Recommended Posts

17 minutes ago, stawns said:

They've got miller on an elc still and though he'll get a raise, he's not going to break the bank on his next contract either.  They're in good shape capwise.

 

I know he's lhd, but would they take miller in a miller deal, rather than Schneider?

 

 

 

Hughes.        Hamonic

OEL.               Myers

Miller.             Schenn

It’s definitely possible, but if that happens Hughes or OEL switch sides.  If they move Hamonic too I would go with:

 

Miller Hughes

OEL Myers

Rathbone Schenn

 

  • Cheers 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Fanuck said:

I much prefer Schneider over K'A.  Never thought K'A used his size as effectively as he could and Schneider in my view is more versatile. As for cap, they're worried about losing Strome which is why Allvin should be leveraging the heck out of them since Miller is an upgrade over Strome for them in almost every aspect. 

I do as well, I'm just considering the "Schneider is untouchable" scenario.  If you go with Miller, does Laffy or Kakko become the focal point?  Or is Miller, Kravstov and a 1st enough for Miller?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, aGENT said:

Like I get they REALLY like Schneider. But where's he fitting, behind Fox and Trouba for the next 4.5 years? Whereas on the left, they have Lindgren and Miller and then some decent but unlikely as high of ceiling guys (beyond maybe Robertson). 

 

Maybe somebody knows something I don't, but it sure looks like Schneider and/or Lundkvist are more expendable than Miller.

Exactly, he's not displacing Fox or Trouba any time soon. Schneider is a luxury they can afford to part with. New York is one of the few teams actually set really well on RD.

Edited by Coconuts
  • Like 1
  • Cheers 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, stawns said:

I do as well, I'm just considering the "Schneider is untouchable" scenario.  If you go with Miller, does Laffy or Kakko become the focal point?  Or is Miller, Kravstov and a 1st enough for Miller?

No, if they're offering K'A he's the ancillary piece to Lafrenier in my view.  I would be satisfied with that deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, kacholu said:

Yes thank you!! 

Get this return or don't trade him

I agree 100%

 

The minimum is Schneider, 1st and one of the following kakko/laff/kravtsov.

 

Even then we are in the immediate interim worse. We don't win a JT miller trade this year or next. It doesn't make us better until realistically 2 years down the road, EVEN with a the massive return above. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Fanuck said:

No, if they're offering K'A he's the ancillary piece to Lafrenier in my view.  I would be satisfied with that deal.

What about this blockbuster...

 

Miller + Garland + Rathbone 

for

Lafreniere + Miller + Schneider + Kravtsov + 2023 2nd 

 

Do we do this deal?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, RWJC said:

What about this blockbuster...

 

Miller + Garland + Rathbone 

for

Lafreniere + Miller + Schneider + Kravtsov + 2023 2nd 

 

Do we do this deal?

Not at all! I would do it if we do only Miller at 50% 

 

We are giving up way too much in this. 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...