Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

[Discussion] Kane, Evander @50% do we want him ?


Kane, Evander @50% would you take him ?  

119 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

Kane with 50% retained by the Sharks in exchange for a roster player you hate. Pearson, Dickenson, Poolman, Chassion, take your pick. Kane has a limited NTC with a 3 team list. I have to think Vancouver is on the list if he grew up here.

 

The Sharks paid real money for him and got 3 years out of him before it came to this. He has 3 years left.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, MaxVerstappen33 said:

Kane with 50% retained by the Sharks in exchange for a roster player you hate. Pearson, Dickenson, Poolman, Chassion, take your pick. Kane has a limited NTC with a 3 team list. I have to think Vancouver is on the list if he grew up here.

 

The Sharks paid real money for him and got 3 years out of him before it came to this. He has 3 years left.

I kind of do to be honest.   Non-hockey issues aside, he's everything that we need (size, speed, skill)

 

Hoglander-Miller-Boeser

Dickinson-Pettersson-E.Kane

Podkolzin-Horvat-Garland

  • Vintage 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Patel Bure said:

I kind of do to be honest.   Non-hockey issues aside, he's everything that we need (size, speed, skill)

 

Hoglander-Miller-Boeser

Dickinson-Pettersson-E.Kane

Podkolzin-Horvat-Garland

You can find that player without the issues. Hard pass. 

  • Cheers 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Patel Bure said:

I kind of do to be honest.   Non-hockey issues aside, he's everything that we need (size, speed, skill)

 

Hoglander-Miller-Boeser

Dickinson-Pettersson-E.Kane

Podkolzin-Horvat-Garland

Our biggest problem is our defense, not our forward group. We have plenty of talent up front, more than likely it activates at some point (probably with a new system). 

The last thing we need is to be taking risks trying to tinker with the top 6. If we're going to take a risk, we should be doing so trying to fix the defense. 

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we are a rebuilding team and we want a first rounder for taking on his cap hit.

 

Are we a rebuilding team? If not, then no way.

 

If we are, then trade players for picks and prospects to clear cap space and take on Kane's cap hit but bury him in the minors.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • -DLC- changed the title to [Discussion] Kane, Evander @50% do we want him ?

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...