JM_ Posted December 4, 2021 Share Posted December 4, 2021 36 minutes ago, N4ZZY said: That's an interesting proposal. So, it'd be Miller for DeBrusk and Hamonic for Carlo? I think Hamonic for Carlo could be had 1 for 1. But Miller for DeBrusk? Miller's a top line forward. DeBrusk is what? 3rd liner? Maybe a 2nd liner? Miller is a big over-payment for DeBrusk, and Hamonic would be a decent 3rd pair guy. Boston could still add at the TDL if they wanted to shore up the right side more. Miller is a ppg C, and would fit Bostons aggressive style really well, and he has another year too. So I see: Miller>>DeBrusk Carlo>>Hamonic So it kind of evens out in overall value. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Me_ Posted December 4, 2021 Share Posted December 4, 2021 This team is super messed if we’re trading Miller for DeBrusk… Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JM_ Posted December 4, 2021 Share Posted December 4, 2021 2 minutes ago, Me_ said: This team is super messed if we’re trading Miller for DeBrusk… thats why i suggested adding Carlo. Long shot, but thats the price I'd want. DeBriusk is done there, he's not worth much on the market for them. Might not even get a QO. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Me_ Posted December 4, 2021 Share Posted December 4, 2021 (edited) 9 minutes ago, JM_ said: thats why i suggested adding Carlo. Long shot, but thats the price I'd want. DeBriusk is done there, he's not worth much on the market for them. Might not even get a QO. There’s this kid…. I think his name is something like Pastrnak… gotta be something there… Miller is now a superstar. As long as Miller is producing like he’s producing… there is not one reason to sell low. Edited December 4, 2021 by Me_ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JM_ Posted December 4, 2021 Share Posted December 4, 2021 45 minutes ago, Me_ said: There’s this kid…. I think his name is something like Pastrnak… gotta be something there… Miller is now a superstar. As long as Miller is producing like he’s producing… there is not one reason to sell low. well, if you can think of another way to get a top 4 RHD I'd like to hear it, its going to cost us real talent. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rekker Posted December 4, 2021 Share Posted December 4, 2021 59 minutes ago, Me_ said: This team is super messed if we’re trading Miller for DeBrusk… Yip. Supported the Canucks for decades. But if they traded JT for Debrusk, I'd be done. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Me_ Posted December 4, 2021 Share Posted December 4, 2021 8 minutes ago, JM_ said: well, if you can think of another way to get a top 4 RHD I'd like to hear it, its going to cost us real talent. A T4RHD shouldn’t cost your best offensive player, let alone your main engine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SilentSam Posted December 5, 2021 Share Posted December 5, 2021 I’d trade Boeser for Debrusk.. we have versatility in the line up that can bump over from Center to RW or up a line. Doubt if Boeser would go at 5m per though.. maybe too much for Bruins. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeNiro Posted December 5, 2021 Share Posted December 5, 2021 7 minutes ago, SilentSam said: I’d trade Boeser for Debrusk.. we have versatility in the line up that can bump over from Center to RW or up a line. Doubt if Boeser would go at 5m per though.. maybe too much for Bruins. You’re all about the bad takes lately huh? Boeser has way more value than Debrusk. Selling low on Boeser would be beyond stupid. Add a new coach that can coach offense and sell high in the offseason if they don’t wanna pay him 7 mil. 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JM_ Posted December 5, 2021 Share Posted December 5, 2021 1 hour ago, Me_ said: A T4RHD shouldn’t cost your best offensive player, let alone your main engine. in today's NHL it does. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Me_ Posted December 5, 2021 Share Posted December 5, 2021 1 minute ago, JM_ said: in today's NHL it does. Nope. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JM_ Posted December 5, 2021 Share Posted December 5, 2021 2 minutes ago, Me_ said: Nope. yup 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Me_ Posted December 5, 2021 Share Posted December 5, 2021 5 minutes ago, JM_ said: yup Nope 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
higgyfan Posted December 5, 2021 Share Posted December 5, 2021 27 minutes ago, DeNiro said: You’re all about the bad takes lately huh? Boeser has way more value than Debrusk. Selling low on Boeser would be beyond stupid. Add a new coach that can coach offense and sell high in the offseason if they don’t wanna pay him 7 mil. Boeser is struggling right now, but there's no reason to think this is a permanent situation. He had a great season last year and looked to have fully recovered from his wrist injury. He also improved other aspects of his game. Debrusk is in his second season of struggling and really hasn't improved his game from his first season in the NHL. If Brock is traded, it really needs to be for a player that can fill one of the gaping holes on this team, and/or a decent prospect and pick. Anything less would be a horrible trade for this team. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JM_ Posted December 5, 2021 Share Posted December 5, 2021 1 hour ago, Me_ said: Nope I see we have reached the pinnacle of our conversation. If you have an example of a top 4 RHD under 25 being traded for less value than Miller I'd love to see it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SilentSam Posted December 5, 2021 Share Posted December 5, 2021 (edited) 5 hours ago, DeNiro said: You’re all about the bad takes lately huh? Boeser has way more value than Debrusk. Selling low on Boeser would be beyond stupid. Add a new coach that can coach offense and sell high in the offseason if they don’t wanna pay him 7 mil. I don’t see Boeser playing any better than Debrusk can.. add Debrusks physicality.. I think you just enjoy a good ping pong match DeNiro. Lol.. “bad takes” Low on Boeser? What he’s elevating our team? Why hang on to something that’s depreciating right in front of your eyes? Edited December 5, 2021 by SilentSam Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ballisticsports. Posted December 5, 2021 Share Posted December 5, 2021 44 minutes ago, SilentSam said: I don’t see Boeser playing any better than Debrusk can.. add Debrusks physicality.. I think you just enjoy a good ping pong match DeNiro. Lol.. “bad takes” Low on Boeser? What he’s elevating our team? Why hang on to something that’s depreciating right in front of your eyes? It is the Canuck Way When do we EVER sell high? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SilentSam Posted December 5, 2021 Share Posted December 5, 2021 2 minutes ago, ba;;isticsports said: It is the Canuck Way When do we EVER sell high? Hamhuis was a prime example,. Lots of people here thinking over the moon.. wait for it wait for it wait for it in Retrospect, we probably got way too much for Linden lol. Naslund was a steal.. JT now looking like our next Captain maybe that’s where the fanbase makes their comparisons , on the perfect steals we did. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeNiro Posted December 5, 2021 Share Posted December 5, 2021 18 minutes ago, ba;;isticsports said: It is the Canuck Way When do we EVER sell high? Set the bar low of just making the playoffs and we hang onto to players for as long as possible. when has this team ever done a proper rebuild? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rekker Posted December 5, 2021 Share Posted December 5, 2021 News update. Debrusk requests trade to anywhere but Vancouver. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now