JayDangles Posted December 10, 2021 Share Posted December 10, 2021 Appreciate the breakdown OP. Looking back Jim did a lot of good things IMHO, the problem is when he missed, he missed bad. Lost a couple of key guys for nothing, signed a few bad contracts and backed a coach for too long. Benning deserved to go, but I don't think he did terrible. Especially now that we're seeing the team play at a higher level the second a new coach comes in. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NHL97OneTimer Posted December 11, 2021 Share Posted December 11, 2021 On 12/6/2021 at 1:32 PM, ken kaniff said: Bad: -Traded a 3rd for Dickinson -Traded Gaudette for Highmore (This was a downgrade at the time. Gaudette came off a good season. Highmore is an AHL player) -Traded a 3rd for Nate Schmidt then traded him for a 3rd -Traded Dahlen for Linus Karlsson -Signed Tyler Myers -Signed Tucker Poolman -Signed Hamonic -Overpayed Tanner Pearson Good breakdown. JB had his misses for sure, but no way he was a disaster. I just wished he had a wingman to prevent some of the gaffes. But overall, he's constructed a team that, with some tweaks and better coaching, is decent. Not a top job for an 8-year history, but definitely not a disaster. You have a long list of "bad" stuff, some of which I agree with, but here's where I disagree: Dickinson for a 3rd - I think it's too early to judge this one. Dickinson looks better under BB already. A 3rd is no guarantee in this league.....so "debatable" but not "bad" Gaudette for Highmore - Gaudette has been waived since, so tough to suggest that this was "bad", so "debatable" is probably reasonable, though you could say "good" if he was a trashy player in the room that affected team morale (rumours were there but I can't say that this actually was the case) Nate Schmidt - we gave up nothing so how is this "bad"? Just unfortunate that he didn't play well for us. If he was also not a fit in the room, then moving him for a net loss of nothing despite his stock dropping after a year in Vancouver is perhaps considered "good" at that point in time. Dahlen for Karlsson - probably a bit too early to tell here. Would suggest "debatable" Tyler Myers - "debatable" is best suitable. If Myers was a $4.5M/yr player, I'd be very happy. I can't get behind "bad" here. Poolman - still early here too. Not a big cap hit. Perhaps better options out there but tough to say "bad" again. Hamonic - tough course of events so far this year, but unexpected. He's not my favourite D but he does add some stability. Certainly not "bad" Pearson - overpaid? $3.25M/yr is overpaid? He's certainly not taking this team down with his play nor his salary. I would say not "good" but not "bad" at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now