-Vintage Canuck- Posted December 14, 2021 Share Posted December 14, 2021 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Devron Posted December 14, 2021 Share Posted December 14, 2021 Seems like a lot tbh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JM_ Posted December 14, 2021 Share Posted December 14, 2021 4 minutes ago, Devron44 said: Seems like a lot tbh this looks a lot like the deal Baer got. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Devron Posted December 14, 2021 Share Posted December 14, 2021 3 minutes ago, JM_ said: this looks a lot like the deal Baer got. Yeah good comparison. Hasn’t really proven to be a consistent point producer. Doesn’t look like a 2 way player. If he breaks out it could be a good deal. Guessing they are taking a chance on that. Seems rich to me. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil_314 Posted December 14, 2021 Share Posted December 14, 2021 (edited) It's not too crazy, looks like only Abdelkader's buyout and Panik's retained salary will remain as bad deals (Staal/ Dekeyser/ Nielsen with $500k) will be off the books and the kids like Raymond/ Seider are still just on their ELC's. Agreed with the Baertschi comparison but I hope he doesn't have the same injury luck. Edited December 14, 2021 by Phil_314 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elias Pettersson Posted December 14, 2021 Share Posted December 14, 2021 Your team must be pretty bad if you need to re-sign Robby Fabbri to a $4 million per year deal... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-AJ- Posted December 14, 2021 Share Posted December 14, 2021 The Baertschi comparable is probably pretty apt here. Fabbri has averaged 45 points per 82 games over the past two years, but notably, his rate for goals is 25 per 82 games. Baertschi had real bad luck with injuries--maybe Fabbri will be more lucky. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coryberg Posted December 15, 2021 Share Posted December 15, 2021 This makes Garlands contact look as good as MacKinnon's. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coconuts Posted December 15, 2021 Share Posted December 15, 2021 And we get Garland for just under 1m more. JB and co got a lot of things wrong, but they sure look to have nailed the Garland acquisition and signing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.