-Vintage Canuck- Posted January 5, 2022 Share Posted January 5, 2022 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jayinblack Posted January 5, 2022 Share Posted January 5, 2022 (edited) 6'2" 32 yr old RH 4th line centre > 50% FO win % no pts but only -2 in 25 games makes league minimum seems worth a claim Edited January 5, 2022 by Jayinblack 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
N4ZZY Posted January 5, 2022 Share Posted January 5, 2022 3 minutes ago, Jayinblack said: 6'2" 32 yr old RH 4th line centre > 50% 'FO win % no pts but only -2 in 25 games makes league minimum seems worth a claim Fourth line RH center man? Isn’t that something the team needs and doesn’t have enough of? I say it’s worth a claim. He’s making league minimum like you’ve mentioned and said, so it’s not a big deal if he doesn’t work out. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-AJ- Posted January 5, 2022 Share Posted January 5, 2022 8 minutes ago, Jayinblack said: 6'2" 32 yr old RH 4th line centre > 50% FO win % no pts but only -2 in 25 games makes league minimum seems worth a claim 0 points in 25 games is pretty anemic. I'd pass. 1 1 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jayinblack Posted January 5, 2022 Share Posted January 5, 2022 Just now, -AJ- said: 0 points in 25 games is pretty anemic. I'd pass. RH center is a desperate need (and its not like any of our 4th liners are scoring much) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chickenspear Posted January 5, 2022 Share Posted January 5, 2022 52 minutes ago, -Vintage Canuck- said: Who the f*** is Task Elliotte? 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RakuRaku Posted January 5, 2022 Share Posted January 5, 2022 I genuinely see us claiming him... if he's a good PKer??? He's on a 1-year $750k... basically our new Sutter.. why not?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
N7Nucks Posted January 5, 2022 Share Posted January 5, 2022 21 minutes ago, -AJ- said: 0 points in 25 games is pretty anemic. I'd pass. Lammikko's 3 points is hardly any better. But sad to say, Lammikko is slightly better. Nash is 32 and being waived by Tampa. That's not really a great sign. Considering he's being paid league min which should be gold for a contending team. That would lead me to believe he's not good enough anymore. I also pass. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Curmudgeon Posted January 5, 2022 Share Posted January 5, 2022 25 minutes ago, Jayinblack said: 6'2" 32 yr old RH 4th line centre > 50% FO win % no pts but only -2 in 25 games makes league minimum seems worth a claim He he isn't. He doesn't fit with JR's goal of getting younger, he can't put the puck in the ocean with a dump truck, he's played for six teams in six years, and claiming him would mean someone on the current roster would have to be waived. How anyone can say that he'd be an upgrade isn't paying attention. Besides, real improvement isn't going to come with tinkering with the 10th, 11th and 12th skaters in your lineup. Fourth liners are a commodity in the NHL and are widely available for not much money. Ask yourself this: If the Canucks were looking for that one player to put them over the top and have success in the playoffs, do you think Riley Nash is that guy? If not, hard pass, because he doesn't add anything. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post King Heffy Posted January 5, 2022 Popular Post Share Posted January 5, 2022 I'd rather have him as a spare than Chiasson. 2 2 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RakuRaku Posted January 5, 2022 Share Posted January 5, 2022 Just now, King Heffy said: I'd rather have him as a spare than Chiasson. Yes!! especially if Nash is versatile enough to cover RW too!!! We just want a defensively sound RH C/wing.... Chiasson offers nothing when he can't score or assist!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Vintage Canuck- Posted January 5, 2022 Author Share Posted January 5, 2022 15 minutes ago, Chickenspear said: Who the f*** is Task Elliotte? We now have a task to find out who Task is. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theo5789 Posted January 5, 2022 Share Posted January 5, 2022 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jayinblack Posted January 5, 2022 Share Posted January 5, 2022 (edited) 47 minutes ago, Curmudgeon said: He he isn't. He doesn't fit with JR's goal of getting younger, he can't put the puck in the ocean with a dump truck, he's played for six teams in six years, and claiming him would mean someone on the current roster would have to be waived. How anyone can say that he'd be an upgrade isn't paying attention. Besides, real improvement isn't going to come with tinkering with the 10th, 11th and 12th skaters in your lineup. Fourth liners are a commodity in the NHL and are widely available for not much money. Ask yourself this: If the Canucks were looking for that one player to put them over the top and have success in the playoffs, do you think Riley Nash is that guy? If not, hard pass, because he doesn't add anything. our pk is still last in the league < 70% with no RH centers on the roster (and i doubt Sutter will be back this year). Chaisson is 31 so pretty moot point if he'd be the one getting waived for the taxi squad Edited January 5, 2022 by Jayinblack 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jayinblack Posted January 5, 2022 Share Posted January 5, 2022 50 minutes ago, Curmudgeon said: He he isn't. He doesn't fit with JR's goal of getting younger, he can't put the puck in the ocean with a dump truck, he's played for six teams in six years, and claiming him would mean someone on the current roster would have to be waived. How anyone can say that he'd be an upgrade isn't paying attention. Besides, real improvement isn't going to come with tinkering with the 10th, 11th and 12th skaters in your lineup. Fourth liners are a commodity in the NHL and are widely available for not much money. Ask yourself this: If the Canucks were looking for that one player to put them over the top and have success in the playoffs, do you think Riley Nash is that guy? If not, hard pass, because he doesn't add anything. In no way would this be that type of move. More of tinkering to help balance the roster and help with just getting into the playoffs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CRAZY_4_NAZZY Posted January 5, 2022 Share Posted January 5, 2022 Claim him to give Bo and Miller a buffer on the PK. Who knows he fills a gap we sorely need for a Right handed centermen, plays well enough, maybe you can pawn him off for something of value later. Anemic offensively, but his underlying defensive stats show he doesn't give up much if at all defensively. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canucklehead44 Posted January 5, 2022 Share Posted January 5, 2022 Also right handed. For a cheap price he fills a role we need and most importantly is a good penalty killer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hammertime Posted January 5, 2022 Share Posted January 5, 2022 Ya I'm all for this guy! Dickinson Nash Motte would actually be a very good shut down trio. I feel like we have better PP options than Chiasson and if we don't then that needs to be addressed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HKSR Posted January 5, 2022 Share Posted January 5, 2022 1 hour ago, N7Nucks said: Lammikko's 3 points is hardly any better. But sad to say, Lammikko is slightly better. Nash is 32 and being waived by Tampa. That's not really a great sign. Considering he's being paid league min which should be gold for a contending team. That would lead me to believe he's not good enough anymore. I also pass. Being waived by the defending champs and one of the deepest teams in the league is nothing to be ashamed of. Heck, any of our top line guys would likely be 2nd line players or even 3rd line players on Tampa. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Heffy Posted January 5, 2022 Share Posted January 5, 2022 11 minutes ago, HKSR said: Being waived by the defending champs and one of the deepest teams in the league is nothing to be ashamed of. Heck, any of our top line guys would likely be 2nd line players or even 3rd line players on Tampa. Our best forward was on their third line. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.