Warhippy Posted January 10, 2022 Share Posted January 10, 2022 1 hour ago, grandmaster said: Stop the trade Miller scenarios! My god! He is our MVP and unofficial Captain. The Canucks would be nowhere without him and Demko. Please stop. There's a clear reason why he's the topic if so many proposals. Low cap room, expiring contract soon. Will command a massive raise with serious term. Highest possible asset piece to a bubble team or contender Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kuzy Posted January 10, 2022 Share Posted January 10, 2022 16 hours ago, Canuckster86 said: Motte as part of a deal for Crouse is quite funny to read...Would take a 1st round pick or good prospect and a 2nd to get him probably. Canucks ain't in a spot to go after younger good players with our recent dumping of high picks, we need to keep picks and try to draft and develop our own Crouse/Chychrun type players in my opinion You're telling me you'd rather have Motte instead of Crouse? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junkyard Dog Posted January 10, 2022 Share Posted January 10, 2022 Crouse is someone I wouldn't mind looking at. Physical presence. Plays PK and provides a bit of secondary scoring. Fits our age group. IDK what the ask is though or what kind of money he might want. On pace for a career year. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
justathought Posted January 10, 2022 Share Posted January 10, 2022 (edited) Pettersson + Rathbone for Crouse + Chychrun Clears up cash, and we've been winning without him... Edited January 10, 2022 by justathought 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Lock Posted January 10, 2022 Share Posted January 10, 2022 (edited) I guess I could see Kessel getting traded as a rental player given his contract's expiring soon. He's certainly someone who has in the past shown to be able to perform in the playoffs on an already good team. It's funny actually, I was originally going to post saying I doubt he'd get traded, but the scenario's not actually that bad: final year of contract, points are alright for his age, a stanley cup winner, etc. Like he could legitimately be desired by someone. Edited January 10, 2022 by The Lock Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Me_ Posted January 11, 2022 Popular Post Share Posted January 11, 2022 (edited) VAN Chychrun PHX Halak Hamonic Poolman Edited January 11, 2022 by Me_ 6 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roger Neilsons Towel Posted January 11, 2022 Share Posted January 11, 2022 On 1/9/2022 at 12:03 AM, Quantum said: We already gave a lot of assets to get Garland and Ekman-Larsson. If Benning was smarter, he'd have tried to get Chychrun instead of Ekman-Larsson for the assets he gave the Coyotes... especially since OEL basically only gave the Coyotes 2 teams to negotiate with (us and the Bruins). I don't see Rutherford making runs for these guys. I think he's going to be more of a seller than people realize. Our defense needs a major reno as does our bottom six. He'll make deals and they'll be fast and furious when they start. Yeah I’m sure it was either or and Benning decided on OEL over Chychrun… 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goal:thecup Posted January 11, 2022 Share Posted January 11, 2022 Not much being said about JB being able to dump old guys with fat contracts onto the desert dogs, which I think is a huge part of that deal. Dead guys cap hit gone; OEL, and Garly? Incredible. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Salacious Crumb Posted January 11, 2022 Share Posted January 11, 2022 2 hours ago, Goal:thecup said: Not much being said about JB being able to dump old guys with fat contracts onto the desert dogs, which I think is a huge part of that deal. Dead guys cap hit gone; OEL, and Garly? Incredible. Lol. Your post for some reason made picture JB out in the desert wearing a fedora and digging 3 holes. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
86Viking Posted January 11, 2022 Share Posted January 11, 2022 Crouse would be a nice addition to our core group age wise, but we can't give up high round picks which is what Arizona would be after. Only player I can think they might have some interest in is Jack Rathbone, but he has more value to Canuck fans compared to the rest of the league. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HKSR Posted January 11, 2022 Share Posted January 11, 2022 11 minutes ago, Canuckster86 said: Crouse would be a nice addition to our core group age wise, but we can't give up high round picks which is what Arizona would be after. Only player I can think they might have some interest in is Jack Rathbone, but he has more value to Canuck fans compared to the rest of the league. Yeah I'd love to acquire Crouse. 6'4" 220lbs, plays hard, and I think it would be a surprise to many that he's on pace for over 40pts this year. He wouldn't come cheap. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KKnight Posted January 11, 2022 Share Posted January 11, 2022 1 hour ago, HKSR said: Yeah I'd love to acquire Crouse. 6'4" 220lbs, plays hard, and I think it would be a surprise to many that he's on pace for over 40pts this year. He wouldn't come cheap. For the price we would pay, we would be better off throwing our name in to the mix for Kane. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goal:thecup Posted January 11, 2022 Share Posted January 11, 2022 7 hours ago, Salacious Crumb said: Lol. Your post for some reason made picture JB out in the desert wearing a fedora and digging 3 holes. Now you've got me remembering that turtle with the gangster's head glued to its shell, slowly moving across the sand. "Hola DEA" 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuck73_3 Posted January 12, 2022 Share Posted January 12, 2022 22 hours ago, Me_ said: VAN Chychrun PHX Halak Hamonic Poolman The new Raymond , Ballard and a 1st? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Coconuts Posted January 12, 2022 Popular Post Share Posted January 12, 2022 22 hours ago, Me_ said: VAN Chychrun PHX Halak Hamonic Poolman I'd do it, which tells me that Arizona wouldn't 1 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
86Viking Posted January 12, 2022 Share Posted January 12, 2022 23 hours ago, HKSR said: Yeah I'd love to acquire Crouse. 6'4" 220lbs, plays hard, and I think it would be a surprise to many that he's on pace for over 40pts this year. He wouldn't come cheap. After seeing Demko get run last night and the Canucks all be pussies about it...ya we need some toughness, but team Charmin lives on and likely won't change sadly 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Heffy Posted January 12, 2022 Share Posted January 12, 2022 On 1/10/2022 at 1:17 AM, Stech said: You're telling me you'd rather have Motte instead of Crouse? Arizona would have little interest in Motte. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BabychStache Posted January 13, 2022 Share Posted January 13, 2022 On 1/10/2022 at 2:04 PM, justathought said: Pettersson + Rathbone for Crouse + Chychrun Clears up cash, and we've been winning without him... I think you’re onto something here, but I think that’s a little too lopsided to work for the Canucks. Pete + 3rd for Crouse + Chychrun lets us keep the real offensive engine; JT Miller. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canuck Luck Posted January 13, 2022 Share Posted January 13, 2022 On 1/10/2022 at 8:35 PM, Me_ said: VAN Chychrun PHX Halak Hamonic Poolman hahahaha....they will give up a great young d man on a great contract for crap. Give your head a shake...pathetic suggestion. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Me_ Posted January 13, 2022 Share Posted January 13, 2022 2 minutes ago, Canuck Luck said: hahahaha....they will give up a great young d man on a great contract for crap. Give your head a shake...pathetic suggestion. I’m sorry you failed to see the humour in this. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now