-Vintage Canuck- Posted February 13, 2022 Share Posted February 13, 2022 As reported by Jeff Marek on HNIC during the intermission. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Devron Posted February 13, 2022 Share Posted February 13, 2022 Zacha would be a good pick up depending on what we send. Versatile player with upside still 1 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted February 13, 2022 Share Posted February 13, 2022 They have interest in Garland as well. Garland for Zacha+Bahl who says no? 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brian42 Posted February 13, 2022 Share Posted February 13, 2022 (edited) 3 minutes ago, Devron said: Zacha would be a good pick up depending on what we send. Versatile player with upside still Agreed. 6’3” 210 LBS, .5 pts/Game Center with 50% face win percentage. perfect fit if we are buyers, let’s hope we could get him for a good price. Edited February 13, 2022 by brian42 2 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
70seven Posted February 13, 2022 Share Posted February 13, 2022 (edited) It’s Zacha + Smith for Garland Also Zacha is as much of a C as Dickinson. Far better on the wing. Edited February 13, 2022 by 70seven Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Devron Posted February 13, 2022 Share Posted February 13, 2022 1 minute ago, brian42 said: Agreed. 6’3” 210 LBS, .5 pts/Game Center with 50% face win percentage. perfect fit if we are buyers, let’s hope we could get him for a good price. Even just a hockey trade. Maybe we aren’t buyers or sellers. We shouldn’t be selling the farm regardless of where we finish but a shake up for sure 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brian42 Posted February 13, 2022 Share Posted February 13, 2022 I’d do zacha + for Garland. He’s 25 on a 2.5million salary but he is a RFA. I like Garland and wouldn’t mind his size if we didn’t already have Hughes Petterson and Hoglander but that’s too many small guys IMO. if this rumor is true I’m glad they are targeting another center. D is also a need though. 2 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brian42 Posted February 13, 2022 Share Posted February 13, 2022 3 minutes ago, Devron said: Even just a hockey trade. Maybe we aren’t buyers or sellers. We shouldn’t be selling the farm regardless of where we finish but a shake up for sure Yah very true, he’s Probly a better fit than Garland and almost produces as much offense. At 24 years old he’d be a good fit. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JayDangles Posted February 13, 2022 Share Posted February 13, 2022 (edited) Even Garland for Zacha straight up isn't terrible considering we save a couple Million in salary. Which means we can spend it on a Motte or Hamonic type player. If we could do Garland and Dickinson for Zacha and Smith that would be fine by me, and free up some good money. Edited February 13, 2022 by JayDangles Spelling Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BPA Posted February 13, 2022 Share Posted February 13, 2022 (edited) Zacha would be a good pick up Edited February 13, 2022 by BPA 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EternalCanuckFan Posted February 13, 2022 Share Posted February 13, 2022 1 hour ago, JayDangles said: Even Garland for Zacha straight up isn't terrible considering we save a couple Million in salary. Which means we can spend it on a Motte or Hamonic type player. If we could do Garland and Dickinson for Zacha and Smith that would be fine by me, and free up some good money. The Canucks only save money this year. Zacha is a RFA with arbitration rights this summer. His new contract will be a raise from this current cap hit. He might well make closer to what Garland is making. I'm not against acquiring Zacha, including if the deal involves Garland, but I would not do it one-for-one. Last season was Zacha's best and he was on a 55+ point pace. Garland was on a 65+ point pace. They're both having less productive years but IMHO, Garland is the superior player even if there is an argument that Zacha may be a better fit. 1 1 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post AngryElf Posted February 13, 2022 Popular Post Share Posted February 13, 2022 Some of us are overvaluing cap space. You gain that by having players on team friendly deals or those who outplay their contract. Both apply to Garland. Dealing him would be a mistake imo. 3 1 7 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fanfor42 Posted February 13, 2022 Share Posted February 13, 2022 19 minutes ago, Pears said: They have interest in Garland as well. Garland for Zacha+Bahl who says no? Would rather give up hoglander plus rather than garland minus 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BPA Posted February 13, 2022 Share Posted February 13, 2022 Zacha + Bahl for Hogz + Dickinson? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elias Pettersson Posted February 13, 2022 Share Posted February 13, 2022 7 minutes ago, EternalCanuckFan said: The Canucks only save money this year. Zacha is a RFA with arbitration rights this summer. His new contract will be a raise from this current cap hit. He might well make closer to what Garland is making. I'm not against acquiring Zacha, including if the deal involves Garland, but I would not do it one-for-one. Last season was Zacha's best and he was on a 55+ point pace. Garland was on a 65+ point pace. They're both having less productive years but IMHO, Garland is the superior player even if there is an argument that Zacha may be a better fit. Zacha can do much more than Garland. He can play centre or wing, can play on the PP and is a very good penalty killer. Plus he’s about a foot taller than Garland. Garland may be a little better scorer but Zacha is the better player overall. Zacha for Garland straight up would be a good trade for Vancouver. If JR can somehow expand the trade and get the local boy Bahl included as well that would be big for Vancouver. 4 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post kanucks25 Posted February 13, 2022 Popular Post Share Posted February 13, 2022 Boeser going the other way makes more sense here. As long as NJD is willing to take on a Pearson or Poolman to make up the difference in value, I'd be okay with that. I don't know why we would trade Garland. He's one of our few good players that plays up to his contract and never cheats you for effort unlike most of our other forwards. 2 1 5 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post hammertime Posted February 13, 2022 Popular Post Share Posted February 13, 2022 25 minutes ago, brian42 said: I’d do zacha + for Garland. He’s 25 on a 2.5million salary but he is a RFA. I like Garland and wouldn’t mind his size if we didn’t already have Hughes Petterson and Hoglander but that’s too many small guys IMO. if this rumor is true I’m glad they are targeting another center. D is also a need though. I'm a Hoglnder fan but I'd trade him before Garland especially if the return was the same or better. 4 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kanucks25 Posted February 13, 2022 Share Posted February 13, 2022 1 minute ago, hammertime said: I'm a Hoglnder fan but I'd trade him before Garland especially if the return was the same or better. Does not make sense to trade Hoglander unless it's part of a package for like a legit top-4 D-man. Hoglander ought to be a cost-controlled asset for us for many years. 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wildcam Posted February 13, 2022 Share Posted February 13, 2022 20 minutes ago, brian42 said: I’d do zacha + for Garland. He’s 25 on a 2.5million salary but he is a RFA. I like Garland and wouldn’t mind his size if we didn’t already have Hughes Petterson and Hoglander but that’s too many small guys IMO. if this rumor is true I’m glad they are targeting another center. D is also a need though. Yeah it would be trade Zacha 25, 6'3 -- GP 50 - ( 17 G )last season-- Garland 26, 5'10.. I would make the trade bigger body- Basic same point totals in last 3 seasons...Zacha RFA this summer will demand 4.5 -- 4.9 million Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hammertime Posted February 13, 2022 Share Posted February 13, 2022 Just now, kanucks25 said: Does not make sense to trade Hoglander unless it's part of a package for like a legit top-4 D-man. Hoglander ought to be a cost-controlled asset for us for many years. Garland is locked up through his prime and is ready to go full St Louis as much as I love me some Hog Garland is literally his cieling and only getting better. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.