kanucks25 Posted February 13, 2022 Share Posted February 13, 2022 Just now, hammertime said: Garland is locked up through his prime and is ready to go full St Louis as much as I love me some Hog Garland is literally his cieling and only getting better. Hoglander is essentially locked up, too. He's an RFA for a while and his next contract will likely be small given it's his first coming out of his ELC. Zacha shouldn't be too expensive, we shouldn't need to trade prime assets for him. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JeremyCuddles Posted February 13, 2022 Share Posted February 13, 2022 Not really sure where the fit is. I am guessing he wants out cause he wants top 6 looks. But is also a center, 46% career faceoff percentage is pretty decent. Soooooo, what would be the plan for him here? I doubt he gets moved and settles in on our 3rd line, if he was fine with that role he'd just stay in New Jersey. They are young and have a good mix of up and coming studs. Unless he just really dislikes the city I guess, but is fine with a 3rd line role just not with them. A lot to like about him, don't get me wrong. Just not sure what the fit would be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hammertime Posted February 13, 2022 Share Posted February 13, 2022 1 minute ago, kanucks25 said: Hoglander is essentially locked up, too. He's an RFA for a while and his next contract will likely be small given it's his first coming out of his ELC. Zacha shouldn't be too expensive, we shouldn't need to trade prime assets for him. Brock brok brok Brokkok! 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
250Integra Posted February 13, 2022 Share Posted February 13, 2022 Myers with a heart attack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Elias Pettersson Posted February 13, 2022 Popular Post Share Posted February 13, 2022 13 minutes ago, wildcam said: Yeah it would be trade Zacha 25, 6'3 -- GP 50 - ( 17 G )last season-- Garland 26, 5'10.. I would make the trade bigger body- Basic same point totals in last 3 seasons...Zacha RFA this summer will demand 4.5 -- 4.9 million Garland is 5’10” with his skates on… 4 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
N4ZZY Posted February 13, 2022 Share Posted February 13, 2022 16 minutes ago, kanucks25 said: Boeser going the other way makes more sense here. As long as NJD is willing to take on a Pearson or Poolman to make up the difference in value, I'd be okay with that. I don't know why we would trade Garland. He's one of our few good players that plays up to his contract and never cheats you for effort unlike most of our other forwards. Management needs to shed salary somewhere. Garland is good value that’s true. Top six player for $5M. We’d need a good player back at a cost control. Zacha would be RFA, which means he’s a cost controlled player right? They’re about the same age at 24/25 years old. But unlike Garland, Zacha would be up for a new deal. Could he demand something similar to Garland if not more? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
70seven Posted February 13, 2022 Share Posted February 13, 2022 (edited) 17 minutes ago, wildcam said: Yeah it would be trade Zacha 25, 6'3 -- GP 50 - ( 17 G )last season-- Garland 26, 5'10.. I would make the trade bigger body- Basic same point totals in last 3 seasons...Zacha RFA this summer will demand 4.5 -- 4.9 million Disagree. Strong 3-3.5M comparables. I just signed him in a fantasy league haha. 4 years 3.5M Edited February 13, 2022 by 70seven Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kanucks25 Posted February 13, 2022 Share Posted February 13, 2022 1 minute ago, N4ZZY said: Management needs to shed salary somewhere. Garland is good value that’s true. Top six player for $5M. We’d need a good player back at a cost control. Zacha would be RFA, which means he’s a cost controlled player right? They’re about the same age at 24/25 years old. But unlike Garland, Zacha would be up for a new deal. Could he demand something similar to Garland if not more? Yeah that doesn't shed much salary. Zacha will get "Pearson money" at the minimum. Something like Boeser + Poolman opens up 6~ mil in space lol 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warhippy Posted February 13, 2022 Share Posted February 13, 2022 18 minutes ago, kanucks25 said: Boeser going the other way makes more sense here. As long as NJD is willing to take on a Pearson or Poolman to make up the difference in value, I'd be okay with that. I don't know why we would trade Garland. He's one of our few good players that plays up to his contract and never cheats you for effort unlike most of our other forwards. 100% would do Boeser over Garland. Garland may not be the largest but his engine is like that of an endless muscle car vs Boesers that is a temperamental sports car with a will it/won't it work. Boeser for Zacha 1-1 maybe not but if they added a pick in the later round I'd absolutely do that without blinking. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J-23 Posted February 13, 2022 Share Posted February 13, 2022 Miller - Horvat - Boeser Hogs - Pettersson - Podz Domi - Zacha - Garland Where we get all the money for this? I don’t know. How we get Zacha without trading assets? I don’t know. 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Me_ Posted February 13, 2022 Share Posted February 13, 2022 Big boy. 6’3” - 210lbs 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junkyard Dog Posted February 13, 2022 Share Posted February 13, 2022 12 minutes ago, N7Nucks said: Not really sure where the fit is. I am guessing he wants out cause he wants top 6 looks. But is also a center, 46% career faceoff percentage is pretty decent. Soooooo, what would be the plan for him here? I doubt he gets moved and settles in on our 3rd line, if he was fine with that role he'd just stay in New Jersey. They are young and have a good mix of up and coming studs. Unless he just really dislikes the city I guess, but is fine with a 3rd line role just not with them. A lot to like about him, don't get me wrong. Just not sure what the fit would be. My guess is that they're considering Zacha if they're considering moving Miller. If Miller's gone then Zacha would get an opportunity in the top 6. Zacha 50%+ he last couple of years on the dot. He also plays a bit of a two-way role and can PK but hasn't PKed as much this year compared to previous years where he was a mainstay. There's no way we can currently re-sign Zacha. Not sure Devils would be interested in Boeser over Garland. Boeser has a 7.5M qualifying offer whereas Garland's locked up at a reasonable cap hit and term. 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Outsiders Posted February 13, 2022 Share Posted February 13, 2022 4 minutes ago, Me_ said: Big boy. 6’3” - 210lbs doesn't fight. Dickinson same size and is soft. Garland plays with more bite and fire 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Me_ Posted February 13, 2022 Share Posted February 13, 2022 (edited) 15 minutes ago, Warhippy said: 100% would do Boeser over Garland. Garland may not be the largest but his engine is like that of an endless muscle car vs Boesers that is a temperamental sports car with a will it/won't it work. Boeser for Zacha 1-1 maybe not but if they added a pick in the later round I'd absolutely do that without blinking. NYR Boeser Höglander 2nd ‘22 VAN 1st ‘22 Schneider Chytil Edited February 13, 2022 by Me_ 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Screw Posted February 13, 2022 Share Posted February 13, 2022 Boeser >Zacha all day long and twice on Sunday. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Me_ Posted February 13, 2022 Share Posted February 13, 2022 2 minutes ago, Outsiders said: doesn't fight. Dickinson same size and is soft. Garland plays with more bite and fire Never seen him play. Doesn’t need to fight… but he’s soft to play against? We don’t want that. We want to truculate. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hammertime Posted February 13, 2022 Share Posted February 13, 2022 3 minutes ago, Outsiders said: doesn't fight. Dickinson same size and is soft. Garland plays with more bite and fire Garland 1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trebreh Posted February 13, 2022 Share Posted February 13, 2022 Dickinson + Pearson + Poolman for Zacha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junkyard Dog Posted February 13, 2022 Share Posted February 13, 2022 1 minute ago, Me_ said: NYR Boeser VAN 1st ‘22 Schneider Rags pass. They can't afford to re-sign Boeser. Only could use cheaper guys 1-2 years like Miller cause they have youngsters to re-sign. Also they likely value 1st + Schneider way more than Boeser. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hammertime Posted February 13, 2022 Share Posted February 13, 2022 Just now, Me_ said: Never seen him play. Doesn’t need to fight… but he’s soft to play against? We don’t want that. We want to truculate. Also thinks Boeser is worth Schnider and a 1st. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now