Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

Habs Deal Their 1st OA (Discussion)


Recommended Posts

Probably an exercise in futility, but wondering if anyone dreams up a good one. We never see 1st OA's get dealt, especially from a team hosting a draft! How far would a rival GM/team have to go, to persuade with something irresistible?

 

Unfortunately I see the Avs winning it all this spring. Afterwards, drunk on success, they offer this to Mtl:

 

COL: Newhook, Byram, Girard

 

Mtl: 1st OA & Mike Hoffman(an undesired cap dump to help Mtl)

 

Outrageous to ponder..but imagine winning Stanley, & THEN landing the top pick right afterwards?

 

What team could possibly assemble an offer the Habs couldn't refuse?

Edited by Nuxfanabroad
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, qwijibo said:

Montreal hasn’t picked 1st oa in 42 years and now they have a chance to do that in front of their home fans. They aren’t moving that pick 

Do you remember the circumstances on that 1980 pick? I believe it was Wickenheiser over Denis Savard? Also pretty sure Grundman had taken over for Sam Pollock?

 

There was a lot of heat/debate over this one, as Denis was dynamic, French, yet undersized. Apparently the pressure on Doug Wickenheiser was just too heavy, & they moved him to St Loo

 

Used to wonder if the Habs would've built a more aggressive/offensive 1980's squad, had they drafted DS.

  • Cheers 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Nuxfanabroad said:

Do you remember the circumstances on that 1980 pick? I believe it was Wickenheiser over Denis Savard? Also pretty sure Grundman had taken over for Sam Pollock?

 

There was a lot of heat/debate over this one, as Denis was dynamic, French, yet undersized. Apparently the pressure on Doug Wickenheiser was just too heavy, & they moved him to St Loo

 

Used to wonder if the Habs would've built a more aggressive/offensive 1980's squad, had they drafted DS.

Wickenheiser was the consensus number one pick. It wasn’t an off the book choice   He just didn’t work out.  Montréal missed out on both Savard and Coffey. Painful but it happens. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Nuxfanabroad said:

We never see 1st OA's get dealt, especially from a team hosting a draft! How far would a rival GM/team have to go, to persuade with something irresistible?

 

The Lightning and Burkie say hi... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1999_NHL_Entry_Draft

https://globalnews.ca/news/2775878/how-brian-burkes-dealmaking-brought-the-sedins-to-the-vancouver-canucks/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, qwijibo said:

Wickenheiser was the consensus number one pick. It wasn’t an off the book choice   He just didn’t work out.  Montréal missed out on both Savard and Coffey. Painful but it happens. 

I just went to Wiki to refresh my memory(as mentioned before, was hardcore Habs fan as a kid). Indeed Grundman ran things from 78-1983. Also the architect of that much-discussed, infamous deal with the Caps(Walter, Langway, etc...).

 

Ironically he'd draft the great Chris Chelios, who'd ultimately be sent to Chicago for the (then fading) Denis Savard. Yet seems all these blokes would wind up with their names etched in silver, one way or the other.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Nuxfanabroad said:

Do you remember the circumstances on that 1980 pick? I believe it was Wickenheiser over Denis Savard? Also pretty sure Grundman had taken over for Sam Pollock?

 

There was a lot of heat/debate over this one, as Denis was dynamic, French, yet undersized. Apparently the pressure on Doug Wickenheiser was just too heavy, & they moved him to St Loo

 

Used to wonder if the Habs would've built a more aggressive/offensive 1980's squad, had they drafted DS.

 

6 minutes ago, qwijibo said:

Wickenheiser was the consensus number one pick. It wasn’t an off the book choice   He just didn’t work out.  Montréal missed out on both Savard and Coffey. Painful but it happens. 

They were fine... more than fine 6 years later...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, 6of1_halfdozenofother said:

Man thank goodness for Burkie.  That was THE year to go all in and pick the 2 best players in the entire draft.  99% of that draft sucked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, 6of1_halfdozenofother said:

Perhaps, but "never" is an absolute being thrown around that has been demonstrated to be overstated.

Sure.  “Never” isn’t accurate.  It has happened. But not in a long time and not under the current economic  circumstances (salary cap).  It’s it a 100% certainty that 1st oa won’t ever be moved?  No.  But in this specific circumstance I’m pretty confident in saying Montreal will not move that pick. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, qwijibo said:

Sure.  “Never” isn’t accurate.  It has happened. But not in a long time and not under the current economic  circumstances (salary cap).  It’s it a 100% certainty that 1st oa won’t ever be moved?  No.  But in this specific circumstance I’m pretty confident in saying Montreal will not move that pick. 

I agree with the bolded, but I should note that the OP didn't differentiate between salary-cap era vs. pre-cap era.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

MacKinnon, Stamkos, Hedman...How many #1OA's have legitimately paid off in spades? If one goes back to analyze, it's easy to pick off numerous yrs where the top drafter would've been wise to ca$h in their position, garnering 3-5 top assets.

 

It's merely theoretical(for decades now), but one of these yrs a GM will likely be so bold.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, HKSR said:

Man thank goodness for Burkie.  That was THE year to go all in and pick the 2 best players in the entire draft.  99% of that draft sucked.

Considering more than 3 players (of 272 drafted) were talented and long-time veteran players in the league performing at a high level (just offhand, there are the Sedins, Zetterberg, and Miller of the Ryan variety who were drafted in '99), I would say your bolded statement is also an overstatement.  :lol:

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 6of1_halfdozenofother said:

Considering more than 3 players (of 272 drafted) were talented and long-time veteran players in the league performing at a high level (just offhand, there are the Sedins, Zetterberg, and Miller of the Ryan variety who were drafted in '99), I would say your bolded statement is also an overstatement.  :lol:

haha, ok, maybe 97% sucked.

  • Cheers 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd trade Miller to NYR for their pick, Lafrenier and K Miller.

 

Then Lafrenier and the NYR pick and our 15th pick and a plus to MTL for the 1st OA but even then they probably wouldn't do it because the draft is literally being held in Montreal and picking 1st OA in your own barn is a HUGE deal

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...