Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

[Rumour] Pearson and Dickson Being Shopped


Recommended Posts

Jim Rutherford traded Tanner Pearson, he can do it again.

 

I actually think that a lot of the Canucks more redundant contracts are tradeable. Poolman, Dickinson, Pearson, Myers. With Hamonic off the books with no money retained, I believe this management group can find suitors for these players.

 

Dickinson seems like he'll get the Nate Schmidt treatment. A team will think they can rehab him after an off year and take a chance on him, Pearson has value on a contender, Myers is a tall RD with two years remaining coming off his best season in years, and well -- Poolman may be an LTIR guy or he might be a guy they have to dump in Arizona.

 

Won't be shocked if one of those guys is shipped alongside Mikey Dipietro. Mikey needs a fresh start and I can see a team taking on someone like Dickinson or Pearson while also taking a chance on a goaltending prospect like Mikey. It's clear that Arturs Silovs is gonna be the starter/1B in Abby next season with Spencer Martin as the backup for the big club. Mikey seems to have lost ground and I hate to admit that/see it.... but that covid year really threw a curveball for his development and confidence.

  • Upvote 1
  • Vintage 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Dixon Ward said:

I don't think Pearson gets enough respect.  He works hard, is a 200 foot player and can fill in on most lines.  Also a class act and a good teammate.  If it's a good trade, take it, but for me he is not a cap dump.

He doesn't in Vancouver (media and fans) but I think teams around the league respect what he brings. He's a guy who does alot of the dirty work to help more offensive players be offensive. I think the reality is, age wise, he doesn't fit the long term plan, he will be valued around the league, and management is looking at ways to free up cap.

 

This doesn't surprise me at all, and if we can swing a 2nd back for him, I think that would be a great trade. Literally every team would want him, if they're a contender they see what he brings and know its valued in the playoffs, if they're a young team, the way he leads, his approach to the game, etc, can help...

 

I really like him but from a business perspective it makes sense to me.

Edited by NucknAsia
  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Quantum said:

Jim Rutherford traded Tanner Pearson, he can do it again.

 

I actually think that a lot of the Canucks more redundant contracts are tradeable. Poolman, Dickinson, Pearson, Myers. With Hamonic off the books with no money retained, I believe this management group can find suitors for these players.

 

Dickinson seems like he'll get the Nate Schmidt treatment. A team will think they can rehab him after an off year and take a chance on him, Pearson has value on a contender, Myers is a tall RD with two years remaining coming off his best season in years, and well -- Poolman may be an LTIR guy or he might be a guy they have to dump in Arizona.

 

Won't be shocked if one of those guys is shipped alongside Mikey Dipietro. Mikey needs a fresh start and I can see a team taking on someone like Dickinson or Pearson while also taking a chance on a goaltending prospect like Mikey. It's clear that Arturs Silovs is gonna be the starter/1B in Abby next season with Spencer Martin as the backup for the big club. Mikey seems to have lost ground and I hate to admit that/see it.... but that covid year really threw a curveball for his development and confidence.

Actually would be a good trade for Edmonton. They need a goalie prospect, and Dickenson/Pearson are defensive players they could use...notwithstanding cap issues.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well that's just a tad under six million in cap space if they are traded for picks or minor league prospects. I believe this is what JR was referring to when he said

needing cap flexibility. Pearson had a decent year and maybe that had a little something to do with moving him now, if this is all true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Quantum said:

Jim Rutherford traded Tanner Pearson, he can do it again.

 

I actually think that a lot of the Canucks more redundant contracts are tradeable. Poolman, Dickinson, Pearson, Myers. With Hamonic off the books with no money retained, I believe this management group can find suitors for these players.

 

Dickinson seems like he'll get the Nate Schmidt treatment. A team will think they can rehab him after an off year and take a chance on him, Pearson has value on a contender, Myers is a tall RD with two years remaining coming off his best season in years, and well -- Poolman may be an LTIR guy or he might be a guy they have to dump in Arizona.

 

Won't be shocked if one of those guys is shipped alongside Mikey Dipietro. Mikey needs a fresh start and I can see a team taking on someone like Dickinson or Pearson while also taking a chance on a goaltending prospect like Mikey. It's clear that Arturs Silovs is gonna be the starter/1B in Abby next season with Spencer Martin as the backup for the big club. Mikey seems to have lost ground and I hate to admit that/see it.... but that covid year really threw a curveball for his development and confidence.

Pearson to Pittsburgh for (RFA) Krapanen?  

Dickinson is guy I see as a lot more difficult to move out.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The interesting point is that they want to clear cap to be in on trades or UFA's.  Couple big name Swedes could be available this year.  Klingberg on D and Forsberg from Nashville.  Man, I hope that Allvin can create an environment where top Swedish talent want to come here.  I would love to add those guys.

 

If Miller was traded for Schneider and Chytil and we dropped Myers Pearson Dickinson and Poolman then added Klingberg and Forsberg.  Well.....

 

 

  • Vintage 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Dixon Ward said:

I don't think Pearson gets enough respect.  He works hard, is a 200 foot player and can fill in on most lines.  Also a class act and a good teammate.  If it's a good trade, take it, but for me he is not a cap dump.

Not at all. He somewhat underperformed this year, but did take a big step back towards what he was in 2019-20. He's a valuable player who can play 2nd line minutes on many teams, third line minutes on deep teams.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, VancouverHabitant said:

This article is David Quadrelli (love Quads btw), quoting an article by Frank that had no basis other then the fact that Pearson was traded once before. 

 

Just so we're clear on these rumours. 

 

I'm as bored as everyone else so I welcome it all. 

well aren't you just a party pooper! :mad:

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Dixon Ward said:

I don't think Pearson gets enough respect.  He works hard, is a 200 foot player and can fill in on most lines.  Also a class act and a good teammate.  If it's a good trade, take it, but for me he is not a cap dump.

Don't think it is about respect - rather than it is just business.  The players understands and if a team takes Pearson, that is more intune with his age, then he can have another chance at a cup and perhaps have better stats for another contract.. ...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • -Vintage Canuck- changed the title to [Rumour] Pearson and Dickson Being Shopped

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...