Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

[Report] Maple Leafs open to trading Ilya Mikheyev’s rights


Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, JM_ said:

as long as he didn't cost more than Garland I'm OK with it. As @aGENT pointed out we could get assets back moving Garland and replace him with Mikheyev. 

I'd prefer to get Domi if we trade Garland.  He's good in a supporting role and only struggles with he's expected to carry the offence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, King Heffy said:

I'd prefer to get Domi if we trade Garland.  He's good in a supporting role and only struggles with he's expected to carry the offence.

Domi is who we get by shedding Pearson and Dickie. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, King Heffy said:

I'd prefer to get Domi if we trade Garland.  He's good in a supporting role and only struggles with he's expected to carry the offence.

Would laugh and hang up the phone at Domi for Garland. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, King Heffy said:

I'd prefer to get Domi if we trade Garland.  He's good in a supporting role and only struggles with he's expected to carry the offence.

Do I is fine on a cheaper contract and as the third fiddle on our third line.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Alflives said:

Garland is traded for draft capital, and we sign Domi as a UFA.  Isn’t that the idea? 

Would, rather keep Garland. And just not add Domi 

Edited by canuck73_3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, King Heffy said:

Doable if Pearson, Dickinson, and Poolman get moved though.

Would rather just keep Garland and use the money from Dickinson, Poolman and maybe Pearson (he’s the one I’d be willing to keep of the 3) and use that money to improve on the right side defense  rather than get Domi. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...