Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

[Signing] Penguins re-sign Evgeni Malkin


Recommended Posts

sleepy Jim misses another one :bigblush:

Sorry i've been drinking .. heavily lol - seems this was always gonna happen, wonder how this is gonna play out for the grandpa club at the pens - likely they would have been better selling off the aging stars and trying to out tank the hawks but time will tell - could be a few long rough years for pens fans

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, DeNiro said:

That wouldn’t clear any cap for them though, it would actually add cap.

 

We would have to take someone like Zucker back in a trade from them for that to work. Maybe throw in Poulin as a sweetener?

Have to be like a weird package:

 

hoglander, pearson and poolman for zucker and Marino 

 

They get upside with hoglander plus more cap flex and pearson and hoglander are easier pieces to flip than a zucker 

 

We get upside with Marino and potentially zucker has a bounce back year since he hasn’t fit in there


Zucker best years were  with boudreau in nunny I believe.
 

Zucker is awful with malkin. 
 

Zucker value is at an all time low and I think he has little to no term on his deal? 
 

pearson gives them an actual player who could work out as a depth vet winger for a team expecting to push playoffs.


I know it doesn’t help our cap crunch.

 

i think zucker just has t been a fit in the locker room or with malkin.


(kinda long post evolved as I typed on my phone changed the package) 

 

5.5 million zucker

4.4 million Marino 

total: 9.9 million

 

4.9 million Garland

2.5 million poolman

total: 7.4 million 

 

doesn’t help our cap crunch but if trade miller hopefully we get that cap flex we need and zucker contract ends next season. Maybe he appreciates us trading for him and giving him an opportunity to show his worth and loves what we all about and signs a team friendly extension after… wait who am I kidding!

 

anyways if they’d do that deal I’d do it.

 

he also plays with a lot of heart.

 

 

Zucker-EP40-Boeser

Kuzmenko-Horvat-Podkolzin

Pearson-Necas-Hoglander

Mamin-White-Lazar

 

OEL-Myers

Hughes-Marino

Rathbone-Schenn-Dermott (however this plays out)

 

Demko

Martin

 

would this be awful?

Edited by R3aL
  • Cheers 1
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, R3aL said:

Have to be like a weird package:

 

hoglander, pearson and poolman for zucker and Marino 

 

They get upside with hoglander plus more cap flex and pearson and hoglander are easier pieces to flip than a zucker 

 

We get upside with Marino and potentially zucker has a bounce back year since he hasn’t fit in there


Zucker best years were  with boudreau in nunny I believe.
 

Zucker is awful with malkin. 
 

Zucker value is at an all time low and I think he has little to no term on his deal? 
 

pearson gives them an actual player who could work out as a depth vet winger for a team expecting to push playoffs.


I know it doesn’t help our cap crunch.

 

i think zucker just has t been a fit in the locker room or with malkin.


(kinda long post evolved as I typed on my phone changed the package) 

 

5.5 million zucker

4.4 million Marino 

total: 9.9 million

 

4.9 million Garland

2.5 million poolman

total: 7.4 million 

 

doesn’t help our cap crunch but if trade miller hopefully we get that cap flex we need and zucker contract ends next season. Maybe he appreciates us trading for him and giving him an opportunity to show his worth and loves what we all about and signs a team friendly extension after… wait who am I kidding!

 

anyways if they’d do that deal I’d do it.

 

he also plays with a lot of heart.

 

 

Zucker-EP40-Boeser

Kuzmenko-Horvat-Podkolzin

Pearson-Necas-Hoglander

Mamin-White-Lazar

 

OEL-Myers

Hughes-Marino

Rathbone-Schenn-Dermott (however this plays out)

 

Demko

Martin

 

would this be awful?

That's an intriguing idea. I hate giving up on Hoglander so early, and Pearson is a solid player, but your proposal simultaneously gets us our RD and gets us out of that Poolmam contract. Zucker is up after this season so I'm not too worried about that. 

 

No idea how the Pens would feel about it though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, 48MPHSlapShot said:

Wow. Guess that takes the Pens out of the market for Miller. 4 years is a bit much term for a player of his age imo, but the cap is is friendly. 

Not sure it does. Miller is a LW as well as center, so they could throw him on the wing of either Crosby or Malkin and get really good results.

 

Signing Malkin and Letang for the type of contracts that they did tells me that they think they can squeeze one more cup out of them before they go into a rebuild again.

 

Question would be, who would get a deal done for us?

 

Marino, Kapanen and a 2nd 2023, 3rd, 2024?

 

Is that enough or do we need another piece?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, DeNiro said:

Pens were never really a suitor.

 

Marino is not enough in a Miller trade. Didn’t like the other pieces proposed.

Agreed.   The suggested Pit pkg's never moved the needle much for me whatsoever despite the vociferous views from many here that Marino is 'Tanev-like'.   Miller is arguably one of the top 3 or 4 power forwards in the entire league.   He's elite and can be a game-breaker.  As such, in my view,  we need a young blue-chip prospect and/or a young roster player ready to break out into elite territory.   

  • Cheers 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, R3aL said:

Have to be like a weird package:

 

hoglander, pearson and poolman for zucker and Marino 

 

They get upside with hoglander plus more cap flex and pearson and hoglander are easier pieces to flip than a zucker 

 

We get upside with Marino and potentially zucker has a bounce back year since he hasn’t fit in there


Zucker best years were  with boudreau in nunny I believe.
 

Zucker is awful with malkin. 
 

Zucker value is at an all time low and I think he has little to no term on his deal? 
 

pearson gives them an actual player who could work out as a depth vet winger for a team expecting to push playoffs.


I know it doesn’t help our cap crunch.

 

i think zucker just has t been a fit in the locker room or with malkin.


(kinda long post evolved as I typed on my phone changed the package) 

 

5.5 million zucker

4.4 million Marino 

total: 9.9 million

 

4.9 million Garland

2.5 million poolman

total: 7.4 million 

 

doesn’t help our cap crunch but if trade miller hopefully we get that cap flex we need and zucker contract ends next season. Maybe he appreciates us trading for him and giving him an opportunity to show his worth and loves what we all about and signs a team friendly extension after… wait who am I kidding!

 

anyways if they’d do that deal I’d do it.

 

he also plays with a lot of heart.

 

 

Zucker-EP40-Boeser

Kuzmenko-Horvat-Podkolzin

Pearson-Necas-Hoglander

Mamin-White-Lazar

 

OEL-Myers

Hughes-Marino

Rathbone-Schenn-Dermott (however this plays out)

 

Demko

Martin

 

would this be awful?

Considering Poolman was struggling with recurring concussion like symptoms during the season, which kept him on IR through the end of the season, I don't believe that we could trade him right now. Not till we see if he's got a doctors all clear to resume playing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Read a good post on a Pens message board:

 

“Maybe it’s time to lay off Ron Hextall a bit.  Just signed Letang, Malkin, Rakell and Rust for a combined $22.3 million annually. Way less than anyone could have projected.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, RWJC said:

Read a good post on a Pens message board:

 

“Maybe it’s time to lay off Ron Hextall a bit.  Just signed Letang, Malkin, Rakell and Rust for a combined $22.3 million annually. Way less than anyone could have projected.”

I'd agree with that.  Realistically, the Penguins don't care about term.  This is about riding out their window with Crosby and then tanking hard when he hangs them up.  Extra years to get the cap down are the right strategy.

  • Cheers 1
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, R3aL said:

Have to be like a weird package:

 

hoglander, pearson and poolman for zucker and Marino 

 

They get upside with hoglander plus more cap flex and pearson and hoglander are easier pieces to flip than a zucker 

 

We get upside with Marino and potentially zucker has a bounce back year since he hasn’t fit in there


Zucker best years were  with boudreau in nunny I believe.
 

Zucker is awful with malkin. 
 

Zucker value is at an all time low and I think he has little to no term on his deal? 
 

pearson gives them an actual player who could work out as a depth vet winger for a team expecting to push playoffs.


I know it doesn’t help our cap crunch.

 

i think zucker just has t been a fit in the locker room or with malkin.


(kinda long post evolved as I typed on my phone changed the package) 

 

5.5 million zucker

4.4 million Marino 

total: 9.9 million

 

4.9 million Garland

2.5 million poolman

total: 7.4 million 

 

doesn’t help our cap crunch but if trade miller hopefully we get that cap flex we need and zucker contract ends next season. Maybe he appreciates us trading for him and giving him an opportunity to show his worth and loves what we all about and signs a team friendly extension after… wait who am I kidding!

 

anyways if they’d do that deal I’d do it.

 

he also plays with a lot of heart.

 

 

Zucker-EP40-Boeser

Kuzmenko-Horvat-Podkolzin

Pearson-Necas-Hoglander

Mamin-White-Lazar

 

OEL-Myers

Hughes-Marino

Rathbone-Schenn-Dermott (however this plays out)

 

Demko

Martin

 

would this be awful?

Dude,  youre spending too much time making up fantasy lines that make zero sense.  Zucker is useless, and ppl are overating marino.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 48MPHSlapShot said:

Garland in a straight up hockey trade?

 

52 minutes ago, DeNiro said:

I think they’d be looking to save more than that.

 

Probably wanna move out at least 3 mil.

 

Garland + Dermott  for Marino + Kapanen...?

  • Cheers 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, 48MPHSlapShot said:

That's an intriguing idea. I hate giving up on Hoglander so early, and Pearson is a solid player, but your proposal simultaneously gets us our RD and gets us out of that Poolmam contract. Zucker is up after this season so I'm not too worried about that. 

 

No idea how the Pens would feel about it though.

My heads all over the place lol need some chips to start falling tomorrow 

 

I’m going crazy with what ifs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, EddieVedder said:

Age doesnt matter as much when youre the type of athlete gino is.  He will still be elite for another 3 years at least 

 

1 hour ago, Locke Lamora said:

Another potential landing spot for Miller off the board. I hope the Rangers are sweating. NYI as well.  Little Johnny likely going to the Devils…if Twitter randos can be believed.

Sorry guys but I am going to be a contrarian.

 

1. FIrst, Malkin has been a great player for the Pens and I can understand why a lot of people,  especially Pens fans. think it is "right" for Malkin to finish his career with the Pens.

 

2. But, age catches up  with everyone. No exceptions. not even Wayne Gretzky. Age has two big effects on hockey players, One effect is declining underlying skills.  The other effect  is increasingly likelihood of injury. Malkin has already had a lot of injury problem -- enough to make his new contract a likely problem. As for underlying skills I just looked the numbers in Natural Stat Trick for even strength expected goal for percentage for all players who played at least 400 minutes. He ranked 108th our of 641 -- so easily in the top 20%. That makes him a good top 6 forward but a long, long way behind the top players in the league. That performance is okay for 6.1 million cap hit if he were not injured for half the season. But it is pretty certain to decline. 

 

Like I said, I can understand that fans will feel good about this contract but, in a pure hockey calculation, it is unlikely to be a good contract for the Pens by the 2nd year of the contract. 

 

As for taking Pitt out of the market for Miller, I don't think there has been any meaningful indication that they were ever in the market of Miller. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Happy for them, players like this shouldn't play on random crap teams to finish their careers. There have been reports that they may want to dump Marino's cap which is very interesting. 

 

We'd have to give them someone with value but cheap. Realistically all we have there are picks, prospects, Rathbone and Hoglander.

 

Is Rathbone for Marino straight up worth it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...