Nucker 67 Posted June 22 Share Posted June 22 18 minutes ago, canuckwings said: For forwards, the one name I haven't seen much discussion about is Gabe Perreault Perreault could be a sneaky great pick. Skilled and so smart, although on the smaller side. Never know, if he grows a few more inches and puts on more muscle weight, he could be a very good NHLer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Herberts Vasiljevs Posted June 22 Share Posted June 22 I'm very happy to see that Honzek isn't getting shafted in rankings lately. I think he might be the Mo Seider of this draft, in the sense that he's a freak of nature with pro swagger and, possibly, an understated offensive game (even for a forward). I wouldn't put it past a team like Detroit or St. Louis to select him. He's going to be a beast in this league for many years. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Herberts Vasiljevs Posted June 22 Share Posted June 22 12 minutes ago, NUCKER67 said: Perreault could be a sneaky great pick. Skilled and so smart, although on the smaller side. Never know, if he grows a few more inches and puts on more muscle weight, he could be a very good NHLer. It says a lot about him that he has vaulted into the top-10 of Bob's list. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Off_The_Schneid! Posted June 22 Share Posted June 22 1 hour ago, NUCKER67 said: This could be the guy Allvin is willing to trade up for, to make sure VAN gets him. I find it a bit interesting that Simashev was barely a 1st rounder and now he's being talked about as the possible best D in the draft. Watchung video of Simashev though, he dominates with his size and speed. I’m not buying the trade up smoke screen, his body language when he said that makes me think he’s going to do the opposite and trade down, By moving OEL they have more leverage that they don’t need to Move Garland. If Chicago is desperate to move up, by moving OEL they could squeeze an additional pick out of them to Chicago- 11th overall, Garland To Van: 19th overall , 35th, 55th Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrJockitch Posted June 22 Share Posted June 22 5 minutes ago, Off_The_Schneid! said: I’m not buying the trade up smoke screen, his body language when he said that makes me think he’s going to do the opposite and trade down, By moving OEL they have more leverage that they don’t need to Move Garland. If Chicago is desperate to move up, by moving OEL they could squeeze an additional pick out of them to Chicago- 11th overall, Garland To Van: 19th overall , 35th, 55th Never trust anything a GM says in press conference unless it was Benning, he wasn’t subtle enough to not be transparent. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Herberts Vasiljevs Posted June 22 Share Posted June 22 6 minutes ago, Off_The_Schneid! said: I’m not buying the trade up smoke screen, his body language when he said that makes me think he’s going to do the opposite and trade down, By moving OEL they have more leverage that they don’t need to Move Garland. If Chicago is desperate to move up, by moving OEL they could squeeze an additional pick out of them to Chicago- 11th overall, Garland To Van: 19th overall , 35th, 55th I still doubt they trade down. It eliminates so much possibility that they won't get the C/D they covet, whether we're talking about guys like Willander or Danielson. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Off_The_Schneid! Posted June 22 Share Posted June 22 (edited) https://twitter.com/hockey2l/status/1671890104695263238?s=46&t=faVA8ku7pjHB0APpWLA4Fw Simashev? Edited June 22 by Off_The_Schneid! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuckwings Posted June 22 Share Posted June 22 10 minutes ago, Off_The_Schneid! said: I’m not buying the trade up smoke screen, his body language when he said that makes me think he’s going to do the opposite and trade down, By moving OEL they have more leverage that they don’t need to Move Garland. If Chicago is desperate to move up, by moving OEL they could squeeze an additional pick out of them to Chicago- 11th overall, Garland To Van: 19th overall , 35th, 55th I'm not sure if I would do this. That's too big of a drop from 11 to 19th. Plus Garland shouldn't be an added on here unless we view him as a cap dump. That shouldn't be the case anymore after the OEL buyout. If there's only team we should trade down with it would be Nashville at 15th in my opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Off_The_Schneid! Posted June 22 Share Posted June 22 2 minutes ago, canuckwings said: I'm not sure if I would do this. That's too big of a drop from 11 to 19th. Plus Garland shouldn't be an added on here unless we view him as a cap dump. That shouldn't be the case anymore after the OEL buyout. If there's only team we should trade down with it would be Nashville at 15th in my opinion. Regardless of OEL they still need to trade a winger. Yes to a cap dump money can go to a defenceman Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrJockitch Posted June 22 Share Posted June 22 6 minutes ago, Off_The_Schneid! said: https://twitter.com/hockey2l/status/1671890104695263238?s=46&t=faVA8ku7pjHB0APpWLA4Fw Simashev? 6’4” skates like Hughes and is Millstein client. Big yes. Dan, we draft Simashev, you send Barbashev our way. Kind of like the Kuzmenko, Mikheive package deal. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuckwings Posted June 22 Share Posted June 22 4 minutes ago, Off_The_Schneid! said: https://twitter.com/hockey2l/status/1671890104695263238?s=46&t=faVA8ku7pjHB0APpWLA4Fw Simashev? One of Simashev or Willander will be great. But I feel there's a good chance someone might snag Simashev before us. I'm actually a bit torn if we have to pick between the 2. Interested to hear what everyone here think if it's down to the 2 of them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sp3nny Posted June 22 Share Posted June 22 1 minute ago, canuckwings said: One of Simashev or Willander will be great. But I feel there's a good chance someone might snag Simashev before us. I'm actually a bit torn if we have to pick between the 2. Interested to hear what everyone here think if it's down to the 2 of them. Said it a while back, but Simashev is the #1 D on my board. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Herberts Vasiljevs Posted June 22 Share Posted June 22 5 minutes ago, DrJockitch said: 6’4” skates like Hughes and is Millstein client. Big yes. Dan, we draft Simashev, you send Barbashev our way. Kind of like the Kuzmenko, Mikheive package deal. Sounds legit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smashian Kassian Posted June 22 Share Posted June 22 Leonard, Simashev & Willander as the targets sounds perfect to me. Can't imagine Leonard getting too us, leaving us with one of the Dmen (who I would prefer anyways tbh) 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JamesB Posted June 22 Share Posted June 22 17 minutes ago, Off_The_Schneid! said: I’m not buying the trade up smoke screen, ... 10 minutes ago, DrJockitch said: Never trust anything a GM says in press conference unless it was Benning, he wasn’t subtle enough to not be transparent. I had the same reaction about Allvin. He did not give anything away about draft strategy. If you might make a trade on draft day you don't to reveal your preferences in advance. So, yeah, we might take a Russian. We might move up, (or we might move down). Allvin is just playing his cards close to his chest. I think the only real information we have about Canuck draft preferences is the dinner invitations with prospects: Danielson, Wood, Barlow, Benson, and Willander. Dinner openings are scarce enough that the team would not waste them on a deception exercise. So we know the Canucks are looking seriously at these five guys. This group suggests that the Canucks are thinking of moving down, not up, as it is quite possible that 3 or 4 of those guys are still on the board when the Canucks pick so they could down and still expect to get one of them. The only one of those guys who is a near consensus to go before 11 is Benson, so it is possible that the Canucks are thinking of moving up a few spots to take him. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuckwings Posted June 22 Share Posted June 22 1 minute ago, Off_The_Schneid! said: Regardless of OEL they still need to trade a winger. Yes to a cap dump money can go to a defenceman I do agree we probably should still move a winger to get more cap flexibility, just maybe not through this trade down scenario. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Off_The_Schneid! Posted June 22 Share Posted June 22 57 minutes ago, canuckwings said: One of Simashev or Willander will be great. But I feel there's a good chance someone might snag Simashev before us. I'm actually a bit torn if we have to pick between the 2. Interested to hear what everyone here think if it's down to the 2 of them. Not many team in the top ten would pick him definitely not top 5 Arizona- No Philly- need center Washington- doubt it want center RHD Detroit- stacked with LHD St Louis- Generally draft North American players I would think Reinbacher would go to one of the above if they wanted a D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Arrogant Worms Posted June 22 Share Posted June 22 2023 NHL Draft: Why Timur Mukhanov Could Be the Value Pick of the Class https://thehockeynews.com/news/2023-nhl-draft-why-timur-mukhanov-could-be-the-value-pick-of-the-class Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Off_The_Schneid! Posted June 22 Share Posted June 22 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hammertime Posted June 22 Share Posted June 22 3 hours ago, NUCKER67 said: Perreault could be a sneaky great pick. Skilled and so smart, although on the smaller side. Never know, if he grows a few more inches and puts on more muscle weight, he could be a very good NHLer. IMO he's better than Cristal Benson. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now