Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

[Rumour] Zach Aston-Reese skating at New Jersey Devils practice facility; remains unsigned


Recommended Posts

  • Ilya Mikheyev changed the title to [Rumour] Zach Aston-Reese skating at New Jersey Devils practice facility; remains unsigned
48 minutes ago, Ghostsof1915 said:

Meh?

It's all about the role. No, he's not a high paid, fancy player that is going to get you lots of points. But for a 4th line player, he plays the role well. If we didn't already have our 4th line basically set, I'd be interested. But as it stands we already have too many forwards.

  • Cheers 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ghostsof1915 said:

His best year was 17 Points.

Meh?

 

Other than his second season, when he set that career high of 17 points (and also a career high points/GP), Aston-Reese’s value has been almost entirely on the defensive side of the puck, where his impact has placed him as high the 99th to 100th percentile among NHL players in measures like “EV defence WAR.”

 

The question for me is whether or not such impacts are projectable, especially when it comes to lower minute role players/specialists?
 

It seems like a fair measure of this class of players’ success is dependent on usage and systems, and their sparkling defensive fancy stats may not always translate perfectly across teams.


We’ve seen this recently with Dickinson, who was another very highly touted (by analytics) defensive forward with an upper 90’s percentile defensive impact, but somehow dropped to an atrociously negative “EV defence WAR” in his first season with Vancouver.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SID.IS.SID.ME.IS.ME said:

Other than his second season, when he set that career high of 17 points (and also a career high points/GP), Aston-Reese’s value has been almost entirely on the defensive side of the puck, where his impact has placed him as high the 99th to 100th percentile among NHL players in measures like “EV defence WAR.”

 

The question for me is whether or not such impacts are projectable, especially when it comes to lower minute role players/specialists?
 

It seems like a fair measure of this class of players’ success is dependent on usage and systems, and their sparkling defensive fancy stats may not always translate perfectly across teams.


We’ve seen this recently with Dickinson, who was another very highly touted (by analytics) defensive forward with an upper 90’s percentile defensive impact, but somehow dropped to an atrociously negative “EV defence WAR” in his first season with Vancouver.

You youngin's and your fancy, new fangled stats. :lol:

  • Haha 2
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ghostsof1915 said:

His best year was 17 Points.

Meh?

 

The point totals aren't worrying, cause that was 17 points in 43 games. The scary thing is the fact he is more fragile than Tanev was for us. Aston-Reese has played more than 60 games once, it was this passed season. With a 50 game season and has two 40 game seasons. League min is the most I'd do. Guy is made of glass and our team has a habit of injurying even the most iron of men. IE Sutter.

  • Cheers 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Ghostsof1915 said:

You youngin's and your fancy, new fangled stats. :lol:

This instance has alot more to do with our team not having any sort of system and just chase the play, In comparison to a real good defensive playoff team at the time. I don't expect his hands to get much better but once all 5 players on the ice learn to support eachother and not play as individuals... He should improve as well. 

 

Pools and Dicky don't need to blow people out of the water, they just need to provide atleast 2.5m in value to the team. Last year was like 750k lol

  • Cheers 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Ghostsof1915 said:

His best year was 17 Points.

Meh?

 

Like others have said, not really an offensive power house, and that's why I said '4th line' in the OP. But he's solid defensively, lots of dzone deployment, and a very very physical presence - 16.7 hits per 60 mins played which is better than any Canucks last year, save for Lockwood who had a tiny sample size and is about 30-40 pounds smaller lol. Aston-Reese & Lazar would give the Canucks two big, physical players on the 4th line who can also PK - Aston-Reese was a key part of Penguins' 3rd place PK last year before he got traded. Whether Joshua, Lockwood, Hoglander or another UFA filled that line, it'd be 2/3rs pretty solid IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...