cripplereh Posted October 18, 2022 Share Posted October 18, 2022 5 hours ago, Putgolzin said: Exactly. It should have been 5 and a game. I agree and the game would have been different.Repeat offender should be 25000 and three game suspension in my books. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuck73_3 Posted October 19, 2022 Share Posted October 19, 2022 6 hours ago, -Vintage Canuck- said: What a joke, would be 3+ if Burroughs did it to Kuznetsov. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skolozsy2 Posted October 23, 2022 Share Posted October 23, 2022 Hmmmm, kinda curious what the ref requires for a major to be called? 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewbieCanuckFan Posted October 23, 2022 Share Posted October 23, 2022 On 10/18/2022 at 5:07 PM, canuck73_3 said: What a joke, would be 3+ if Burroughs did it to Kuznetsov. We'd be hearing it from Ron McLean for the next ten years if it was Burrows doing that. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SilentSam Posted October 25, 2022 Share Posted October 25, 2022 (edited) This is where the league gets it wrong. The money/ fine , is what it is. But durring the game if that was called like it should have been, The Canucks would have rightfully gained an advantage. Personally I think Kuznetsov should get the following game suspension, and then be suspended the next time when his team plays the Canucks. I think this scenario addresses 2 things, gives the team violated against that fair advantage back , And takes the “heat” or pressure off any type of “retribution” by the “code”. Same scenario with what happened with QHighes vs Kane. Edited October 25, 2022 by SilentSam 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now